Literature DB >> 31244969

Institutional Factors Contribute to Variation in Intubation Rates in Status Epilepticus.

Elan L Guterman1, James F Burke2, S Andrew Josephson1, John P Betjemann1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To explore intubation rates among patients with status epilepticus (SE) and the degree of institutional variation.
METHODS: Serial cross-sectional study of SE-related hospitalizations from 2004 to 2013 using data from the National Inpatient Sample. The primary outcome was intubation of patients with SE. Multivariable models identified predictors of intubation, institutional variation in intubation rates, and the proportion of variance attributable to individual hospitals. This analysis was repeated using data from 5 states in the State Inpatient Databases (SID).
RESULTS: There were 119 337 SE hospitalizations. The overall intubation rate was 32.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.2%-33.3%). There was marked variation in estimated intubation rates, ranging from 2% to 80% in the lowest and highest quintile after adjustment. There was somewhat less variability in the SID cohort where quintiles ranged from 10% to 54%. Those undergoing intubation were more often men and presenting with stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, central nervous system infection, hyponatremia, and alcohol withdrawal. Urban location (odds ratio [OR]: 3.8, 95% CI: 2.7-5.5) and hospitalization at a teaching institution (OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.2-12.6) were even stronger predictors of intubation after adjustment for clinical factors. A regression including both patient- and hospital-level variables to predict intubation also performed better than a regression including patient factors alone (C statistic 0.81 vs 0.59, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable institutional variation in intubation rates for SE independent of patient characteristics suggesting that decisions around intubation rest heavily on where one is hospitalized. Further work is needed to clarify how this variation influences outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services research; intubation; neurocritical care; status epilepticus

Year:  2018        PMID: 31244969      PMCID: PMC6582387          DOI: 10.1177/1941874418819349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurohospitalist        ISSN: 1941-8744


  28 in total

1.  Predictors of functional disability and mortality after status epilepticus.

Authors:  J Claassen; J K Lokin; B-F M Fitzsimmons; F A Mendelsohn; S A Mayer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Gerry A Parsons; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Mild traumatic brain injury in the United States, 1998--2000.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Bazarian; Jason McClung; Manish N Shah; Yen Ting Cheng; William Flesher; Jess Kraus
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Airway management in neurological emergencies.

Authors:  Lynn P Roppolo; Karina Walters
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Role of comorbidities in outcome prediction after status epilepticus.

Authors:  Vincent Alvarez; Jean-Marie Januel; Bernard Burnand; Andrea O Rossetti
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 5.864

6.  A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus.

Authors:  B K Alldredge; A M Gelb; S M Isaacs; M D Corry; F Allen; S Ulrich; M D Gottwald; N O'Neil; J M Neuhaus; M R Segal; D H Lowenstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Intramuscular versus intravenous therapy for prehospital status epilepticus.

Authors:  Robert Silbergleit; Valerie Durkalski; Daniel Lowenstein; Robin Conwit; Arthur Pancioli; Yuko Palesch; William Barsan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Estimating the economic burden of status epilepticus to the health care system.

Authors:  L T Penberthy; A Towne; L K Garnett; J B Perlin; R J DeLorenzo
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.184

9.  Validating administrative data in stroke research.

Authors:  David L Tirschwell; W T Longstreth
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  How accurate is ICD coding for epilepsy?

Authors:  Nathalie Jetté; Aylin Y Reid; Hude Quan; Michael D Hill; Samuel Wiebe
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 5.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.