| Literature DB >> 31244876 |
Bing Wang1,2, Guoqiang Xie3, Zhonglai Liu3, Rui He1, Jiao Han1, Shengcai Huang1, Laihua Liu2, Xianguo Cheng1.
Abstract
Alkaline stress (AS) is one of the abiotic stressful factors limiting plant's growth and development. Inorganic pyrophosphatase is usually involved in a variety of biological processes in plant in response to the abiotic stresses. Here, to clarify the responsive regulation of inorganic pyrophosphatase in rice under AS, the mutagenesis of the OsPPa6 gene encoding an inorganic pyrophosphatase in rice cv. Kitaake (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica) was performed by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Two homozygous independent mutants with cas9-free were obtained by continuously screening. qPCR reveals that the OsPPa6 gene was significantly induced by AS, and the mutagenesis of the OsPPa6 gene apparently delayed rice's growth and development, especially under AS. Measurements demonstrate that the contents of pyrophosphate in the mutants were higher than those in the wild type under AS, however, the accumulation of inorganic phosphate, ATP, chlorophyll, sucrose, and starch in the mutants were decreased significantly, and the mutagenesis of the OsPPa6 gene remarkably lowered the net photosynthetic rate of rice mutants, thus reducing the contents of soluble sugar and proline, but remarkably increasing MDA, osmotic potentials and Na+/K+ ratio in the mutants under AS. Metabonomics measurement shows that the mutants obviously down-regulated the accumulation of phosphorylcholine, choline, anthranilic acid, apigenin, coniferol and dodecanoic acid, but up-regulated the accumulation of L-valine, alpha-ketoglutarate, phenylpyruvate and L-phenylalanine under AS. This study suggests that the OsPPa6 gene is an important osmotic regulatory factor in rice, and the gene-editing of CRISPR/Cas9-guided is an effective method evaluating the responsive regulation of the stress-induced gene, and simultaneously provides a scientific support for the application of the gene encoding a soluble inorganic pyrophosphatase in molecular breeding.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; OsPPa6 gene; alkaline stress; inorganic pyrophosphatase; metabonomics; mutagenesis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31244876 PMCID: PMC6580931 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Bioinformatics analyses of the soluble inorganic pyrophosphatase and mutagenesis identification of the OsPPa6 gene. (A) Homology alignment of soluble inorganic pyrophosphatase. OsPPa6, O. sativa Japonica Group (accession: BAS81093); DoPPase, Dichanthelium oligosanthes (accession: OEL38517); ZmPPase, Zea mays (accession: ACG27183); TaPPase, Aegilops tauschii (accession: XP_020167925); ThPP1, Thellungiella halophila (accession: AGK89951); AtPPa6, Arabidopsis thaliana (accession: AED91421). Blue and pink color indicate the similarity; white color indicates the differences; (B) Phylogenetic tree analysis of the soluble inorganic pyrophosphatase. (C) Structural profiles of the OsPPa6 gene with the mutagenesis of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated in the first exon. Black rectangle means the exon. Black line means the intron. The underlined nucleotides indicate the target sites. Nucleotides in red represent PAM sequences. PAM, protospacer adjacent motif. The target sequences are located at +12th to +31th of the gene; (D) Multiple alignments of the OsPPa6 proteins between the wild type and mutants of CRISPR/Cas9-edited.
FIGURE 2Changes in phenotype and biomass of rice under favorable condition or alkaline stress (AS). (A) Germination time; (B) Germination rate; (C) (1) Rice phenotype at seeding stage; (2) Rice phenotype at maturity stage; and (3) Seed differences in phenotype; (D) Shoot height of the seedlings; (E) Fresh weight of the seedlings; (F) Seed-setting rate; and (G) Grain weight of per plant. Values are mean ± SD of six replications and asterisks denote Student’s test significance at level of P ≤ 0.05 (∗) or P ≤ 0.01 (∗∗).
FIGURE 3Gene relative expression levels and physiological changes under favorable culture or AS. (A) Relative expression levels of the OsPPa6 gene in rice shoots; (B) Relative expression levels of the OsGS2 gene in rice shoots; (C) Soluble sugar content; (D) Proline content; (E) MDA content; (F) Osmotic potential. Values are mean ± SD of three replications and asterisks denote Student’s test significance at level of P ≤ 0.05 (∗) or P ≤ 0.01 (∗∗).
The contents of inorganic phosphorus, ATP and pyrophosphate.
| Lines | inorganic phosphorus (P) (mg g-1) | ATP (nmol g-1) | Pyrophosphate (PPi) (nmol g-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | As | Control | As | Control | As | |
| WT | 2.89 ± 0.20 a | 1.61 ± 0.11 a | 131.66 ± 7.00 a | 94.91 ± 6.85 a | 17.69 ± 1.63 b | 15.94 ± 1.58 b |
| line 9 | 1.85 ± 0.07 b | 1.31 ± 0.09 b | 111.38 ± 6.78 b | 76.28 ± 5.74 b | 25.87 ± 1.10 a | 23.06 ± 1.84 a |
| line 13 | 1.90 ± 0.12 b | 1.38 ± 0.04 b | 115.49 ± 6.19 a | 78.13 ± 4.41 b | 23.77 ± 1.56 a | 22.19 ± 1.42 a |
Photosynthetic parameters of rice leaves.
| Treatments | Lines | Pn | Gs | Ci | Tr | WUE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μmol m-2 s-1 | mol m-2 s-1 | μmol mol-1 | mmol m-2 s-1 | μmol mmol-1 | ||
| Control | WT | 12.32 ± 0.06 a | 0.373 ± 0.014 a | 166.29 ± 2.29 a | 4.17 ± 0.42 a | 2.97 ± 0.29 a |
| line 9 | 11.83 ± 0.07 c | 0.316 ± 0.018 b | 163.72 ± 1.93 ab | 4.03 ± 0.35 a | 2.95 ± 0.24 a | |
| line 13 | 12.01 ± 0.06 b | 0.394 ± 0.022 a | 160.45 ± 2.02 b | 4.15 ± 0.13 a | 2.90 ± 0.076 a | |
| AS | WT | 7.34 ± 0.24 a | 0.320 ± 0.016 a | 137.86 ± 1.05 a | 3.70 ± 0.14 a | 1.98 ± 0.01 a |
| line 9 | 5.68 ± 0.11b | 0.266 ± 0.021 b | 124.90 ± 1.33 b | 3.01 ± 0.26 b | 1.89 ± 0.13 ab | |
| line 13 | 5.87 ± 0.13 b | 0.279 ± 0.019 b | 120.52 ± 5.14 b | 3.22 ± 0.11 b | 1.82 ± 0.02 b | |
The contents of chlorophyll, sucrose and starch.
| Lines | Chlorophyll (mg g-1 FW) | Sucrose (mg g-1 FW) | Starch (mg g-1 FW) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | As | Control | As | Control | As | |
| WT | 4.02 ± 0.11 a | 3.08 ± 0.21 a | 3.59 ± 0.31 a | 2.53 ± 0.21 a | 0.62 ± 0.034 a | 0.47 ± 0.029 a |
| line 9 | 3.83 ± 0.13 a | 2.41 ± 0.14 b | 3.46 ± 0.33 a | 1.85 ± 0.31 b | 0.64 ± 0.062 a | 0.30 ± 0.048 b |
| line 13 | 3.77 ± 0.15 a | 2.58 ± 0.28 b | 3.94 ± 0.21 a | 1.78 ± 0.28 b | 0.68 ± 0.046 a | 0.34 ± 0.036 b |
The contents of Na+, K+, and Na+/K+ ratio.
| Lines | Na+ content (mg g-1 DW) | K+ content (mg g-1 DW) | Na+/K+ Ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | As | Control | As | Control | As | |
| WT | 2.66 ± 0.04 a | 14.36 ± 0.41 b | 17.33 ± 0.46 a | 10.01 ± 0.50 a | 0.15 ± 0.003 a | 1.44 ± 0.041 b |
| line 9 | 2.51 ± 0.07 a | 16.43 ± 0.70 a | 16.16 ± 0.98 ab | 9.27 ± 0.54 a | 0.16 ± 0.014 a | 1.78 ± 0.163 a |
| line 13 | 2.55 ± 0.08 a | 16.04 ± 0.82 a | 15.84 ± 0.51 b | 9.65 ± 0.30 a | 0.16 ± 0.004 a | 1.66 ± 0.088 a |
FIGURE 4Metabolomics analyses of the mutants and the wild type. (A) Score scatter plot of OPLS-DA model for group Q vs WT (positive ion mode); (B) Score scatter plot of OPLS-DA model for group Q vs WT (negative ion mode); (C) Volcano plot for group Q vs WT (positive ion mode); (D) Volcano plot for group Q vs WT (negative ion mode).
Identification of partial differential metabolites.
| Retention time/min | m/z[M]+ | Formula | Identification | Relative Quantitative Mean Q/(WT) | Up/down | Pathway | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive-ion | 470.62 | 184.07 | C5H14NO4P | phosphorylcholine | 0.18 (0.29) | down | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 253.32 | 104.11 | C5H14NO | choline | 1.80 (2.00) | down | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | |
| 267.53 | 275.10 | C7H7NO2 | anthranilic acid | 0.02 (0.05) | down | Tryptophan metabolism | |
| 41.89 | 331.08 | C15H10O5 | apigenin | 1.92 (4.00) | down | Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis | |
| 236.92 | 399.13 | C10H12O3 | coniferol | 0.17 (0.24) | down | Biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids | |
| 80.24 | 218.21 | C12H24O2 | dodecanoic acid | 0.07 (0.11) | down | Fatty acid biosynthesis | |
| Negative-ion | 280.28 | 116.07 | C5H11NO2 | L-valine | 0.11 (0.04) | up | Biosynthesis of amino acids |
| 313.61 | 145.02 | C5H6O5 | alpha-ketoglutarate | 0.11 (0.05) | up | Carbon metabolism | |
| 43.00 | 163.04 | C9H8O3 | phenylpyruvate | 0.26 (0.14) | up | Phenylalanine metabolism | |
| 238.70 | 166.08 | C9H11NO2 | L-phenylalanine | 0.20 (0.07) | up | Phenylalanine metabolism | |