Literature DB >> 31243778

Charting the Path Forward for Risk Prediction in Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: International Validation of HALTHCC Among 4,089 Patients.

Daniel J Firl1, Kazunari Sasaki1, Vatche G Agopian2, Andre Gorgen3, Shoko Kimura4, Wethit Dumronggittigule2, John C McVey1, Samuele Iesari5, Gianluca Mennini6, Alessandro Vitale7, Armin Finkenstedt8, Simona Onali9, Maria Hoppe-Lotichius10, Giovanni Vennarecci11, Tommaso M Manzia12, Daniele Nicolini13, Alfonso W Avolio14, Salvatore Agnes14, Marco Vivarelli13, Giuseppe Tisone12, Giuseppe M Ettorre11, Gerd Otto10, Emmanuel Tsochatzis9, Massimo Rossi6, Andre Viveiros8, Umberto Cillo7, James F Markmann4, Toru Ikegami15, Toshimi Kaido16, Quirino Lai5,6, Gonzalo Sapisochin3, Jan Lerut5, Federico N Aucejo1.   

Abstract

Prognosticating outcomes in liver transplant (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to challenge the field. Although Milan Criteria (MC) generalized the practice of LT for HCC and improved outcomes, its predictive character has degraded with increasing candidate and oncological heterogeneity. We sought to validate and recalibrate a previously developed, preoperatively calculated, continuous risk score, the Hazard Associated with Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HALTHCC), in an international cohort. From 2002 to 2014, 4,089 patients (both MC in and out [25.2%]) across 16 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were included. A continuous risk score using pre-LT levels of alpha-fetoprotein, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score, and tumor burden score was recalibrated among a randomly selected cohort (n = 1,021) and validated in the remainder (n = 3,068). This study demonstrated significant heterogeneity by site and year, reflecting practice trends over the last decade. On explant pathology, both vascular invasion (VI) and poorly differentiated component (PDC) increased with increasing HALTHCC score. The lowest-risk patients (HALTHCC 0-5) had lower rates of VI and PDC than the highest-risk patients (HALTHCC > 35) (VI, 7.7%[ 1.2-14.2] vs. 70.6% [48.3-92.9] and PDC:4.6% [0.1%-9.8%] vs. 47.1% [22.6-71.5]; P < 0.0001 for both). This trend was robust to MC status. This international study was used to adjust the coefficients in the HALTHCC score. Before recalibration, HALTHCC had the greatest discriminatory ability for overall survival (OS; C-index = 0.61) compared to all previously reported scores. Following recalibration, the prognostic utility increased for both recurrence (C-index = 0.71) and OS (C-index = 0.63).
Conclusion: This large international trial validated and refined the role for the continuous risk metric, HALTHCC, in establishing pre-LT risk among candidates with HCC worldwide. Prospective trials introducing HALTHCC into clinical practice are warranted.
© 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31243778     DOI: 10.1002/hep.30838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  10 in total

1.  Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using the LiTES-HCC score.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Alejandro Mantero; Craig Newcomb; Cindy Delgado; Kimberly A Forde; David E Kaplan; Binu John; Nadine Nuchovich; Barbara Dominguez; Ezekiel Emanuel; Peter P Reese
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 30.083

Review 2.  Essential updates 2018/2019: Liver transplantation.

Authors:  Masahiro Ohira; Naoki Tanimine; Tsuyoshi Kobayashi; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

Review 3.  Recent advances in liver transplantation for cancer: The future of transplant oncology.

Authors:  Phillipe Abreu; Andre Gorgen; Graziano Oldani; Taizo Hibi; Gonzalo Sapisochin
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2019-07-30

4.  A National Survey of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Practices Following Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Avin Aggarwal; Helen S Te; Elizabeth C Verna; Archita P Desai
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2020-12-08

5.  Impact of cytomegalovirus reactivation just before liver transplantation: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Claudio Marcel B Stadnik; Cassia Ferreira B Caurio; Edison M Rodrigues-Filho; Wagner L Nedel; Guido Pc Cantisani; Maria L Zanotelli; Alessandro C Pasqualotto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2021-05-22

Review 6.  Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors and Predictive Models.

Authors:  Wojciech Andrzej Straś; Dariusz Wasiak; Beata Łągiewska; Olga Tronina; Marta Hreńczuk; Joanna Gotlib; Wojciech Lisik; Piotr Małkowski
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 1.530

7.  Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vladimir J Lozanovski; Ali Ramouz; Ehsan Aminizadeh; Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh; Elias Khajeh; Heike Probst; Susanne Picardi; Christian Rupp; De-Hua Chang; Pascal Probst; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-01-06

Review 8.  Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Should We Improve the Thresholds?

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Shimamura; Ryoichi Goto; Masaaki Watanabe; Norio Kawamura; Yasutsugu Takada
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Polyploidy Spectrum Correlates with Immunophenotype and Shapes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Zhentao Yang; Shiyu Zhang; Ke Zhou; Wu Zhang; Sunbin Ling; Ruiqi Sun; Hong Tang; Xue Wen; Xiaowen Feng; Penghong Song; Xiao Xu; Haiyang Xie; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 10.  Hepatocellular cancer selection systems and liver transplantation: from the tower of babel to an ideal comprehensive score.

Authors:  Jan Lerut; Maxime Foguenne; Quirino Lai
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.