Literature DB >> 31243005

Women's choices in non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy screening: results from a single centre prior to introduction in England.

Adalina Sacco1,2, Hilary Hewitt2, Pranav Pandya1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient choices and uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy screening offered in a contingency model as part of routine care.
METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed data for all women with a singleton pregnancy attending for routine first trimester screening over an 18-month period. Women with a 'high-chance' of trisomy 21, 18 or 13 (≥1:150) were offered the choice of no further testing, NIPT or invasive testing, in line with the screening pathway recommended by the UK National Screening Committee.
RESULTS: Of 9342 women attending for a first trimester ultrasound scan, 7939 women were included in this study. Of these, 352 had a high-chance screening result for trisomy 21, and 291 (82.7%) opted for NIPT. The proportion of women opting for NIPT decreased as the chance of trisomy 21 increased: uptake was 93.2%, 90.0%, 77.1% and 47.2% for women with a chance of 1:100-150, 1:50-99, 1:10-49 and >1:10, respectively. 516 women (5.5%) accessed primary NIPT screening in the private sector, and 638 women (6.8%) declined any aneuploidy screening or testing.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of NIPT testing in a contingency model has a high uptake in a non-research National Health Service setting; the rate of uptake is related to the combined test risk result. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down’s syndrome; NIPT; aneuploidy; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31243005     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  1 in total

1.  Cytogenomic results following high-chance non-invasive prenatal testing: a UK national audit.

Authors:  Fiona S Togneri; Stephanie K Allen; Kathy Mann; Elaine Holgado; Sian Morgan
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 1.588

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.