Literature DB >> 31242491

The Specific Organism: Not Bacterial Gram Type: Drives the Inflammatory Response in Septic Shock.

Adam Linder1, Chris D Fjell2, Malin Inghammar3, Joseph Hsu4, Keith R Walley2, John H Boyd2, James A Russell2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: The inflammatory response was targeted by unsuccessful therapies but ignored pathogen. We hypothesized that the inflammatory response differs according to organism in human septic shock.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured 39 cytokines at baseline and 24 h in patients (n = 363) in the Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST). We compared cytokine profiles (cytokine functional class) at baseline and at 24 h by organism and used hierarchical clustering to classify cytokines according to 28-day outcomes.
RESULTS: In 363 patients, 88 and 176 patients had at least 1 species isolated from blood and other sites, respectively. Cytokine levels differed significantly according to organism: Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae had the highest (baseline and at 24 h), while Enterococcus faecalis (blood) had the lowest mean cytokine levels. N. meningitidis and Klebsiella pneumoniae had significantly higher cytokine levels at baseline versus 24 h (p = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively); E. faecalis had significantly higher cytokine levels at 24 h versus baseline. Hierarchical clustering heat maps showed that pathogens elicited similar cytokine responses not related to the functional cytokine class.
CONCLUSION: The organism type induces different cytokine profiles in septic shock. Specific gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens stimulated similar plasma cytokine-level patterns.
© 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytokines; Gram type; Inflammation; Organism; Pathogen; Septic shock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31242491      PMCID: PMC7098279          DOI: 10.1159/000500418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Innate Immun        ISSN: 1662-811X            Impact factor:   7.349


  29 in total

1.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  D C Angus; W T Linde-Zwirble; J Lidicker; G Clermont; J Carcillo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012.

Authors:  Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen; Michael Bailey; Satoshi Suzuki; David Pilcher; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Microbiologic findings and correlations with serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  J Cohen; E Abraham
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Vasopressin compared with norepinephrine augments the decline of plasma cytokine levels in septic shock.

Authors:  James A Russell; Chris Fjell; Joseph L Hsu; Terry Lee; John Boyd; Simone Thair; Joel Singer; Andrew J Patterson; Keith R Walley
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phase III rhIL-1ra Sepsis Syndrome Study Group.

Authors:  C J Fisher; J F Dhainaut; S M Opal; J P Pribble; R A Balk; G J Slotman; T J Iberti; E C Rackow; M J Shapiro; R L Greenman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Hemodynamic responses to gram-positive versus gram-negative sepsis in critically ill patients with and without circulatory shock.

Authors:  A J Ahmed; J A Kruse; M T Haupt; P H Chandrasekar; R W Carlson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Long-term (10-year) mortality of younger previously healthy patients with severe sepsis/septic shock is worse than that of patients with nonseptic critical illness and of the general population.

Authors:  Adam Linder; Daphne Guh; John H Boyd; Keith R Walley; Aslam H Anis; James A Russell
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  James A Russell; Keith R Walley; Joel Singer; Anthony C Gordon; Paul C Hébert; D James Cooper; Cheryl L Holmes; Sangeeta Mehta; John T Granton; Michelle M Storms; Deborah J Cook; Jeffrey J Presneill; Dieter Ayers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Role of endotoxemia in cardiovascular dysfunction and mortality. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus challenges in a canine model of human septic shock.

Authors:  C Natanson; R L Danner; R J Elin; J M Hosseini; K W Peart; S M Banks; T J MacVittie; R I Walker; J E Parrillo
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Treatment of septic shock with the tumor necrosis factor receptor:Fc fusion protein. The Soluble TNF Receptor Sepsis Study Group.

Authors:  C J Fisher; J M Agosti; S M Opal; S F Lowry; R A Balk; J C Sadoff; E Abraham; R M Schein; E Benjamin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Skeletons in the Cupboard of Dysfunctional Neutrophils Revealed.

Authors:  Heiko Herwald; Arne Egesten
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 7.349

2.  Serious, Severe, Sepsis.

Authors:  Heiko Herwald; Arne Egesten
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 7.349

3.  C-Reactive Protein: More than a Biomarker.

Authors:  Heiko Herwald; Arne Egesten
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 7.111

4.  Some Like It Hot.

Authors:  Arne Egesten; Heiko Herwald
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 7.349

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.