Literature DB >> 31242286

Estimation of Genetic Variance in Fitness, and Inference of Adaptation, When Fitness Follows a Log-Normal Distribution.

Timothée Bonnet1, Michael B Morrissey2, Loeske E B Kruuk1.   

Abstract

Additive genetic variance in relative fitness (σA2(w)) is arguably the most important evolutionary parameter in a population because, by Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection (FTNS; Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. 1st ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press), it represents the rate of adaptive evolution. However, to date, there are few estimates of σA2(w) in natural populations. Moreover, most of the available estimates rely on Gaussian assumptions inappropriate for fitness data, with unclear consequences. "Generalized linear animal models" (GLAMs) tend to be more appropriate for fitness data, but they estimate parameters on a transformed ("latent") scale that is not directly interpretable for inferences on the data scale. Here we exploit the latest theoretical developments to clarify how best to estimate quantitative genetic parameters for fitness. Specifically, we use computer simulations to confirm a recently developed analog of the FTNS in the case when expected fitness follows a log-normal distribution. In this situation, the additive genetic variance in absolute fitness on the latent log-scale (σA2(l)) equals (σA2(w)) on the data scale, which is the rate of adaptation within a generation. However, due to inheritance distortion, the change in mean relative fitness between generations exceeds σA2(l) and equals (exp⁡(σA2(l))-1). We illustrate why the heritability of fitness is generally low and is not a good measure of the rate of adaptation. Finally, we explore how well the relevant parameters can be estimated by animal models, comparing Gaussian models with Poisson GLAMs. Our results illustrate 1) the correspondence between quantitative genetics and population dynamics encapsulated in the FTNS and its log-normal-analog and 2) the appropriate interpretation of GLAM parameter estimates. © The American Genetic Association 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLMM; animal model; fundamental theorem of natural selection; heritability; quantitative genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31242286     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esz018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  5 in total

1.  The role of selection and evolution in changing parturition date in a red deer population.

Authors:  Timothée Bonnet; Michael B Morrissey; Alison Morris; Sean Morris; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Josephine M Pemberton; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  How does contemporary selection shape oak phenotypes?

Authors:  Hermine Alexandre; Laura Truffaut; Etienne Klein; Alexis Ducousso; Emilie Chancerel; Isabelle Lesur; Benjamin Dencausse; Jean-Marc Louvet; Gérard Nepveu; José M Torres-Ruiz; Frédéric Lagane; Brigitte Musch; Sylvain Delzon; Antoine Kremer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  The "New Synthesis".

Authors:  Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  The quantitative genetics of fitness in a wild seabird.

Authors:  Maria Moiron; Anne Charmantier; Sandra Bouwhuis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  The 'algebra of evolution': the Robertson-Price identity and viability selection for body mass in a wild bird population.

Authors:  G K Hajduk; C A Walling; A Cockburn; L E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.