Literature DB >> 31241736

Outcomes After Inguinal Hernia Repair With Mesh Performed by Medical Doctors and Surgeons in Ghana.

Jessica H Beard1, Michael Ohene-Yeboah2, Stephen Tabiri3, Joachim K A Amoako2, Francis A Abantanga3, Carrie A Sims4, Pär Nordin5, Andreas Wladis6, Hobart W Harris7, Jenny Löfgren8.   

Abstract

Importance: Inguinal hernia is the most common general surgical condition in the world. Although task sharing of surgical care with nonsurgeons represents one method to increase access to essential surgery, the safety and outcomes of this strategy are not well described for hernia repair. Objective: To compare outcomes after inguinal hernia repair with mesh performed by medical doctors and surgeons in Ghana. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted from February 15, 2017, to September 17, 2018, at the Volta Regional Hospital in Ho, Ghana. Following successful completion of a training course, 3 medical doctors and 2 surgeons performed inguinal hernia repair with mesh according to the Lichtenstein technique on 242 men with primary, reducible inguinal hernia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was hernia recurrence at 1 year. The noninferiority limit was set at 5 percentage points. Secondary end points included postoperative complications at 2 weeks and patient satisfaction, pain, and self-assessed health status at 1 year.
Results: Two-hundred forty-two patients were included; 119 men underwent operations performed by medical doctors and 123 men underwent operations performed by surgeons. Preoperative patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Two-hundred thirty-seven patients (97.9%) were seen at follow-up at 2 weeks, and 223 patients (92.1%) were seen at follow-up at 1 year. The absolute difference in recurrence rate between the medical doctor group (1 [0.9%]) and the surgeon group (3 [2.8%]) was -1.9 (1-tailed 95% CI, -4.8; P < .001), demonstrating noninferiority of the medical doctors. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications (34 [29.1%] vs 29 [24.2%]), patient satisfaction (112 [98.2%] vs 108 [99.1%]), severe chronic pain (1 [0.9%] vs 4 [3.7%]), or self-assessed health (85.9 vs 83.7 of 100) for medical doctors and surgeons. Conclusions and Relevance: This study shows that medical doctors can be trained to perform elective inguinal hernia repair with mesh in men with good results and high patient satisfaction in a low-resource setting. This finding supports surgical task sharing to combat the global burden of hernia disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31241736      PMCID: PMC6596328          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  29 in total

1.  Prevalence of treated and untreated groin hernia in eastern Uganda.

Authors:  J Löfgren; F Makumbi; E Galiwango; P Nordin; C Ibingira; B C Forsberg; A Wladis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A comparative study of caesarean deliveries by assistant medical officers and obstetricians in Mozambique.

Authors:  C Pereira; A Bugalho; S Bergström; F Vaz; M Cotiro
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-06

3.  Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality.

Authors:  P Primatesta; M J Goldacre
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 4.  Inguinodynia following Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair: a review.

Authors:  Abdul Hakeem; Venkatesh Shanmugam
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Characterizing the global burden of surgical disease: a method to estimate inguinal hernia epidemiology in Ghana.

Authors:  Jessica H Beard; Lawrence B Oresanya; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Rochelle A Dicker; Hobart W Harris
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A prospective cohort study comparing the African and European hernia.

Authors:  D L Sanders; C S Porter; K C D Mitchell; A N Kingsnorth
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Reoperation for inguinal hernia recurrence in Ontario: a population-based study.

Authors:  J K Ramjist; F Dossa; T A Stukel; D R Urbach; L Fu; N N Baxter
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Recurrence patterns of direct and indirect inguinal hernias in a nationwide population in Denmark.

Authors:  Jakob Burcharth; Kristoffer Andresen; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Thue Bisgaard; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M Miserez; E Peeters; T Aufenacker; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; L N Jorgensen; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.

Authors:  Kathleen Lockhart; Douglas Dunn; Shawn Teo; Jessica Y Ng; Manvinder Dhillon; Edward Teo; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-13
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Adult groin hernia surgery in sub-Saharan Africa: a 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Ndong; J N Tendeng; A C Diallo; M L Diao; O Sow; S D Mawuli; M Kalli; A Harissou; O Choua; A D Doumga; A P Togo; M Seck; I Ka; A O Touré; B Diop; P A Ba; P S Diop; M Cissé; R Sani; I Konaté
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.920

2.  Improving surgical education in East Africa with a standardized hernia training program.

Authors:  R Lorenz; C Oppong; A Frunder; M Lechner; D M Sedgwick; A Tasi; R Wiessner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  The State of Surgical Task Sharing for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Limited-Resource Countries.

Authors:  Alexander D Schroeder; Dustin J Tubre; Charles Voigt; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Results of Shouldice hernia repair after 18 years of follow-up in all the patients.

Authors:  A Martín Duce; O Lozano; M Galván; A Muriel; S Villeta; J Gómez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Breaking Specialty Silos: Improving Global Child Health Through Essential Surgical Care.

Authors:  Isaac Wasserman; Alexander W Peters; Lina Roa; Farhana Amanullah; Lubna Samad
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2020-06-30

6.  Outcomes After Elective Inguinal Hernia Repair Performed by Associate Clinicians vs Medical Doctors in Sierra Leone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Thomas Ashley; Hannah Ashley; Andreas Wladis; Håkon A Bolkan; Alex J van Duinen; Jessica H Beard; Hertta Kalsi; Juuli Palmu; Pär Nordin; Kristina Holm; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jenny Löfgren
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  Alterations in the mechanical, chemical and biocompatibility properties of low-cost polyethylene and polyester meshes after steam sterilization.

Authors:  Reiko Wiessner; R Lorenz; A Gehring; T Kleber; C Benz; M Sander; D-U Richter; M Philipp
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.739

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.