| Literature DB >> 31241693 |
Amanda Oliva Gobato1, Ana Carolina Junqueira Vasques1, Antonio Fernando Ribeiro1, Roberto Massao Yamada1, Gabriel Hessel1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of hepatic steatosis (HS) in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis (CF) and associate it with nutritional status.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31241693 PMCID: PMC6821489 DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;4;00007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr ISSN: 0103-0582
Figure 1Ultrasonography of the liver in a patient with hepatic steatosis. The hepatorenal contrast is moderate, and the difference in histogram of the right hepatic lobe/renal cortex is 19.5.
Nutritional status, pancreatic insufficiency and presence of diabetes mellitus in fibrocystic patients with and without hepatic steatosis.
| Hepatic steatosis | p-value | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Present (n=18) |
Absent (n=32) | ||||
| Age (years) mean*** and SD | 13.2±4.9 | 11.7±4.9 | 0.291 | 12.2±4.9 | |
| Gender** | Female (%) | 8 (44.4) | 15 (46.9) | 0.869 | 23 (46) |
| Male (%) | 10 (55.6) | 17 (53.1) | 27 (54) | ||
| BMI*** (mean and SD) | 18.0±4.1 | 15.7±3.8 | 0.058 | 16.6±4.0 | |
| BMI classification** | Malnutrition (%) | 3 (16.7) | 10 (31.2) | 0.165 | 13 (26) |
| Eutrophy (%) | 15 (83.3) | 19 (59.4) | 34 (68) | ||
| Overweight (%) | 0 | 3 (9.4) | 3 (6) | ||
| MAC*** (cm) mean and SD | 20.3±6.8 | 16.5±4.5 | 0.047* | 17.9±5.7 | |
| TSF*** (mm) mean and SD | 8.4±3.5 | 7.0±2.5 | 0.134 | 7.5±2.9 | |
| TSF classification** | Malnutrition (%) | 13 (72.2) | 26 (81.2) | 0.071 | 39 (78) |
| Eutrophy (%) | 1 (5.6) | 5 (15.6) | 6 (12) | ||
| Overweight (%) | 4 (22.2) | 1 (3.1) | 5 (10) | ||
| MAMC*** (mm) mean and SD | 177.7±61.1 | 143.3±41.1 | 0.043* | 155.7±51.4 | |
| MAMC classification** | Malnutrition (%) | 9 (50) | 26 (81.2) | 0.021* | 35 (70) |
| Eutrophy (%) | 9 (50) | 6 (18.8) | 15 (30) | ||
| Pancreatic insufficiency** | Present (%) | 18 (100) | 30 (93.8) | 0.279 | 48 (96) |
| Absent (%) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.2) | 2 (4) | ||
| Diabetes mellitus** | Present (%) | 3 (16.7) | 4 (12.5) | 0.684 | 7 (14) |
| Absent (%) | 15 (83.3) | 28 (87.5) | 43 (86) | ||
SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; MAC: midarm circumference; TSF: triceps skinfold; MAMC: midarm muscle circumference; *p<0.05; **chi-square test for categorical variables; ***Student’s t test for continuous variables.
Figure 2(A) Classification of nutritional status by body mass index according to presence/absence of hepatic steatosis. (B) Distribution of percentiles of Body Mass Index in box plot for patients with and without hepatic steatosis. (C) and (D) Association of triceps skinfold and midarm circumference according to presence/absence of hepatic steatosis.
Characteristics of the sample according to the percentile (p) of body mass index and per presence/absence of hepatic steatosis.
| HS | p-value* | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Present (n=18) |
Absent (n=32) | ||||
| Percentile of BMI per age | Median (p25-p75) | 38 (15-75) | 15 (1-50) | 0.175 | 20 (1-50) |
| Mean±SD | 39.0±32.1 | 27.2±30.1 | 31.5±30.7 | ||
| Min-max | 1-85 | 1-95 | 1-95 | ||
BMI: body mass index; SD: standard deviation; *Mann-Whitney test.