| Literature DB >> 31240621 |
Mårten Unnerbäck1,2, Johnny T Ottesen3, Peter Reinstrup4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The underlying physiology of the intracranial pressure (ICP) curve morphology is still poorly understood. If this physiology is explained it could be possible to extract clinically relevant information from the ICP curve. The venous outflow from the cranial cavity is pulsatile, and in theory the pulsatile component of venous outflow from the cranial cavity should be attenuated with increasing ICP. In this study, we explored the relationship between ICP and the pulsatility of the venous outflow from the intracranial cavity.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral blood flow measurement; Cerebral hemodynamics; Intracranial pressure; Jugular veins; PC-MRI
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31240621 PMCID: PMC6757136 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-019-00733-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurocrit Care ISSN: 1541-6933 Impact factor: 3.210
Fig. 1The arteries and veins used for measurements of cerebral blood flow and flow in the internal jugular veins. The small white arrows point at the internal carotid arteries, the large white arrows point at the vertebral arteries, and the black arrows point at the internal jugular veins. White color represents flow into the cranial cavity, and black color represents flow out from the cranial cavity. The intensity of the color represents the flow value. Note the difference in both size and flow between the left and the right internal jugular veins
Fig. 2The flow rates over one cardiac cycle in one individual. IJVflow, the combined flow in the internal jugular veins, Fmax, maximum flow, Fmin minimum flow. The pulsatile component of internal jugular vein flow is represented by the gray area; the non-pulsatile component of internal jugular vein flow is represented by the white area
Clinical data and flow measurements divided into diagnosis groups
| TBI | SAH | Meningitis | Othera | All individuals | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 37 | |
| Age (years) | 44 ± 14 | 57 ± 8 | 52 ± 10 | 54 ± 16 | 50 ± 14 |
| Sex (M/F) | 14 M/1 F | 4 M/7 F | 3 M/2 F | 3 M/3 F | 24 M/13 F |
| ICPmean (mmHg) | 8 ± 9 | 9 ± 7 | 11 ± 11 | 10 ± 7 | 9 ± 7 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 84 ± 11 | 94 ± 14 | 90 ± 14 | 92 ± 6 | 89 ± 13 |
| CPP (mmHg) | 75 ± 12 | 85 ± 15 | 79 ± 17 | 82 ± 11 | 80 ± 14 |
| CBF (ml/min) | 981 ± 295 | 990 ± 224 | 1035 ± 271 | 1014 ± 419 | 996 ± 298 |
| IJVflow (ml/min) | 665 ± 233 | 671 ± 256 | 541 ± 228 | 812 ± 388 | 674 ± 280 |
| IJVarea (cm2) | 0.90 ± 0.44 | 1.13 ± 0.52 | 1.18 ± 0.71 | 1.02 ± 0.46 | 1.02 ± 0.52 |
| VPI | 52 ± 16 | 59 ± 13 | 58 ± 19 | 52 ± 10 | 55 ± 15 |
Data are given in mean ± SEM
CBF cerebral blood flow, CPP cerebral perfusion pressure, ICPmean mean intracranial pressure, IJVarea the combined area of the internal jugular veins, IJVflow flow through the internal jugular veins, MAP mean arterial pressure, SAH subarachnoid hemorrhage, TBI traumatic brain injury, VPI venous pulsatile index
aOther include one multiple cerebral arterial emboli, two intracerebral hemorrhage, two hydrocephalus and one meningioma
Fig. 3Regression plot of the venous pulsatile index (VPI) against intracranial pressure (ICP). R = − 0.47, p = 0.003
Fig. 4Distribution of the amount of cerebral blood flow (CBF) drained through the internal jugular veins (IJVflow). Number of individuals plotted against percentage of CBF flowing through the internal jugular vein (IJV)