| Literature DB >> 31239452 |
I Y Habib1, Aimi Asilah Tajuddin2, Hafiz Armi Noor1, Chee Ming Lim1, Abdul Hanif Mahadi3, N T R N Kumara4.
Abstract
Low power consumption, fast response and quick recovery times are important parameters for gas sensors performance. Herein, we report the experimental and theoretical studies of ZnO and Cr doped ZnO nanostructures used in low temperature (50 °C) sensors for the detection of CO. The synthesized films were characterized by XRD, UV-Vis, FE-SEM and EDX. The XRD patterns for the ZnO and 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO films confirm the formation of a single-phase hexagonal wurtzite structure. The reduction of the ZnO optical band gap from 3.12 eV to 2.80 eV upon 0.5 wt% Cr doping is well correlated with the simulation data. The FE-SEM images of the films show spherical morphology with the estimated particle sizes of about ~40 nm and ~ 25 nm were recorded for the ZnO and 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO films, respectively. Enhanced gas sensing performance is achieved with Cr doping and the sensitivity of ZnO increases from 9.65% to 65.45%, and simultaneously decreasing the response and recovery times from 334.5 s to 172.3 s and from 219 s to 37.2 s, respectively. These improvements in gas sensing performance are due to the reduction in particle size and optical band gap, and an increase in specific surface area.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31239452 PMCID: PMC6592902 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45313-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A schematic diagram for the experimental set-up of the gas sensing system.
Figure 2Optimized structures of (A) Zn12O12 nano-cage, (B) Cr doped Zn11O12 nano-cage.
Energies of HOMO and LUMO levels and band gap of Zn12O12 and Cr/Zn11O12.
| System | Ehomo (eV) | Elumo (eV) | Egap (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zn12O12 | −7.00 | −2.86 | 4.14 |
| Cr/Zn11O12 | −4.45 | −2.77 | 1.68 |
Figure 3(A) X-ray diffraction patterns for the ZnO (Pure) and 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO films and (B) X-ray diffraction peaks of the most intense reflections for the ZnO (pure) and 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO films.
The XRD data for the ZnO (pure) and 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO films; the texture coefficient (TC), the crystallite size (D), the lattice parameter (a, c and volume of the unit cell V), u parameter, and Zn-O bond length (L).
| Material | D (nm) | Lattice parameters | u | L (Å) | TC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a(Å) | c(Å) | V(Å3) | 100 | 002 | 101 | ||||
| ZnO (pure) | 49.80 | 3.2449 | 5.1975 | 47.3945 | 0.3799 | 1.9747 | 0.68 | 1.11 | 1.21 |
| 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO | 20.04 | 3.2387 | 5.2007 | 47.2397 | 0.3793 | 1.9724 | 0.76 | 1.20 | 1.04 |
The In-plane stress (σ), the specific surface area (Ss), the micro-strain (ε) and dislocation density (δ) for the ZnO (pure) and 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO films.
| Material | Stress, σ × 109 | Ss (m2/g) | Micro-strain, ε | Dislocation density, δ × 10−3 (lines/nm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZnO (pure) | 0.54 | 21.49 | 0.13 | 0.40 |
| 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO | 0.27 | 53.41 | 0.33 | 2.49 |
Figure 4FE-SEM images (scale; 100 nm, mag; x 150,000) for (A) ZnO (pure) (B) 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO.
Figure 5EDX spectra of (A) ZnO (Pure) and (B) 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO NSs films.
Figure 6(A) Absorbance spectra and (B) Band gap energy plots for the ZnO (pure) and 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO NS films.
Figure 7The dynamic response curves for (A) ZnO (pure) and (B) 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO sensor resistance vs. the detection time; (C) The sensor response (%) as a function of CO concentration in sccm (D) Response time (tres) and (E) Recovery time (trecov) of ZnO (Pure) and 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO sensors vs. CO concentration in sccm.
Values of sensor response (sensitivity %), response time, and recovery time vs CO concentration.
| Material | Flow rate (sccm) | Sensor Response (%) | Response time, tres (sec) | Recovery time trecov (sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZnO (Pure) | 300 | 8.77 | 290.90 | 154.00 |
| 400 | 8.90 | 311.00 | 175.50 | |
| 500 | 9.65 | 334.50 | 219.00 | |
| 0.5 wt% Cr/ZnO | 300 | 23.38 | 32.00 | 24.10 |
| 400 | 31.62 | 103.8.00 | 26.20 | |
| 500 | 65.45 | 172.3.00 | 37.20 |