Literature DB >> 31238487

Interocular asymmetry in choroidal thickness in healthy Indian population using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Amber Amar Bhayana1, Devesh Kumawat1, Vinod Kumar1, Mahesh Chandra1, Parijat Chandra1, Ramanjit Sihota1, Atul Kumar1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31238487      PMCID: PMC6611235          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_8_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Sir, The assessment of choroidal thickness (CT) is of paramount importance in diagnosis and management of various ocular disorders. The inter-ocular asymmetry in CT should be kept in mind while analyzing the results of different studies. The authors had previously reported the normative data for sub-foveal CT (SFCT) in 119 healthy Indian patients (age 19–45 years, refractive error −6 to +4 diopters, best corrected visual acuity 20/20) using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT, DRI-OCT, Topcon Japan).[1] The CT was further compared between the fellow eyes in different regions of the macular area based on the ETDRS (early treatment diabetic retinopathy study) grid. The mean CT in the right eye was significantly greater than the left eye in all EDTRS regions except the temporal inner and outer regions [see Table 1], with the maximum difference in the nasal outer region (mean 14.39 μm, P = 0.0001, Student t test). The individual difference in the subfoveal CT (SFCT) between the right and left eye ranged from +133 to −125 μm. The SFCT was greater in the right eye as compared to left eye in 59% of the cases (n = 70).
Table 1

Details of mean choroidal thickness (in microns) in all 9 ETDRS zones; comparison of right and left eyes (mean±1SD)

CT (R)CT (L)D
CSF302.94±65.49295.26±65.777.68±47.90 (P=0.0829)
NIM288.37±64.46277.02±67.1911.35±45.24 (P=0.0072)
NOM249.18±66.05234.78±68.0814.39±39.34 (P=0.0001)
TIM293.59±63.84295.21±59.51-1.63±46.27 (P=0.7014)
TOM280.78±60.60282.48±58.22-1.70±43.56 (P=0.6700)
SIM311.64±68.27299.02±62.0312.63±50.71 (P=0.0076)
SOM310.17±63.78299.24±55.6010.92±46.78 (P=0.0121)
IIM300.721±72.63296.22±68.454.50±52.22 (P=0.3487)
IOM289.53±70.05283.47±69.116.05±47.33 (P=0.1652)

(CT- choroidal thickness, R- right eye, L- left eye, D- difference between right and left (R-L), CSF- central subfoveal, NIM- nasal inner macula, NOM- nasal outer macula, TIM- temporal inner macula, TOM- temporal outer macula, SIM- superior inner macula, SOM- superior outer macula, IIM- inferior inner macula, IOM- inferior outer macula)

Details of mean choroidal thickness (in microns) in all 9 ETDRS zones; comparison of right and left eyes (mean±1SD) (CT- choroidal thickness, R- right eye, L- left eye, D- difference between right and left (R-L), CSF- central subfoveal, NIM- nasal inner macula, NOM- nasal outer macula, TIM- temporal inner macula, TOM- temporal outer macula, SIM- superior inner macula, SOM- superior outer macula, IIM- inferior inner macula, IOM- inferior outer macula) The inter-ocular asymmetry in CT may arise from the difference in ocular blood flow. The right ophthalmic artery receives blood from the brachiocephalic trunk which itself is more proximal to the left ventricle than the left common carotid artery which branches into the left ophthalmic artery.[2] The reason for maximum difference in the nasal macular region is not clearly understood. We hypothesize dominance of 1 eye in an individual to have some contribution to the asymmetry but this could not be confirmed retrospectively as this was a cross sectional study. Similar inter-ocular differences in CT have been previously reported in Caucasian and Middle-Eastern patients using enhanced depth spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT).[345] As SS-OCT provides a better delineation of the CSI than SD-OCT, it may be superior in evaluating the CT. Ruiz-Medrano et al. had used SS-OCT for studying the inter-ocular CT difference in Spanish population.[2] The present study is the first to report the inter-ocular asymmetry in CT on SS-OCT in the Indian population.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Topographic variation and interocular symmetry of macular choroidal thickness using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Fred K Chen; Jonathan Yeoh; Waheeda Rahman; Praveen J Patel; Adnan Tufail; Lyndon Da Cruz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Richard F Spaide; Hideki Koizumi; Maria C Pozzoni; Maria C Pozonni
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  ASYMMETRY IN MACULAR CHOROIDAL THICKNESS PROFILE BETWEEN BOTH EYES IN A HEALTHY POPULATION MEASURED BY SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY.

Authors:  Jorge Ruiz-Medrano; Ignacio Flores-Moreno; Pablo Peña-García; Javier A Montero; Jay S Duker; José M Ruiz-Moreno
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Interocular symmetry in macular choroidal thickness in children.

Authors:  Christiane Al-Haddad; Lama El Chaar; Rafic Antonios; Mays El-Dairi; Baha' Noureddin
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Choroidal thickness in normal Indian eyes using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Amber A Bhayana; Vinod Kumar; Akshay Tayade; Mahesh Chandra; Parijat Chandra; Atul Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Interocular asymmetry of choroidal thickness and vascularity index measurements in normal eyes assessed by swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Hao Zhou; Yingying Shi; James Choe; Mengxi Shen; Liang Wang; Kelly Chen; Qinqin Zhang; William J Feuer; Giovanni Gregori; Philip J Rosenfeld; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.