Literature DB >> 31238156

Detection of multiple viral sequences in the respiratory tract samples of suspected Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus patients in Jakarta, Indonesia 2015-2016.

Tri Yuli Setianingsih1, Ageng Wiyatno2, Teguh Sarry Hartono1, Evi Hindawati1, Aghnianditya Kresno Dewantari2, Khin Saw Myint2, Vivi Lisdawati1, Dodi Safari3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The identification and analysis of viral etiological agents from suspected Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) cases admitted to Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital (IDH) using molecular assays.
METHODS: Biological samples were collected from 13 hospitalized patients suspected of MERS-CoV infection in Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso IDH from July 2015 to December 2016. The majority of patients presented with pneumonia, with symptoms including fever (≥37.5 °C), labored breathing, and cough, and with a history of travel to the Middle East. Viral RNA was isolated and converted to cDNA, which was used as a template for the detection of 12 viral panels using conventional PCR and sequencing.
RESULTS: Viral etiological agents detected in the patients were enterovirus D68, dengue virus type 3, rhinovirus C, human coronavirus 229E, herpes simplex virus type 1, influenza virus H1N1, influenza virus H3N2, human metapneumovirus, and rhinovirus A60.
CONCLUSIONS: The sequences of nine viral agents under different taxa were detected in suspected MERS-CoV patients, including influenza virus, paramyxovirus, coronavirus, enterovirus, human metapneumovirus, and herpesvirus.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indonesia; MERS-CoV; PCR; Pneumonia; Viral

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31238156      PMCID: PMC7110706          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


Introduction

Since 2012, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) has been reported worldwide, with a total of 2206 confirmed cases and 787 deaths in 27 countries (WHO, 2019). The spectrum of MERS-CoV infection ranges from a mild viral respiratory illness to a rapidly fatal pneumonia complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute renal failure (Chong et al., 2015), with a mortality rate of around 35–50% (Noorwali et al., 2015, Yang et al., 2017, Hui et al., 2018). No specific licensed antiviral treatment is currently available for MERS-CoV infection (Rabaan et al., 2017). The most common clinical symptoms of MERS-CoV are fever, cough, and dyspnea. The positive detection rate is significantly higher in hospitalized patients with pneumonia compared to those with upper respiratory tract infections. These symptoms usually occur with a mean incubation period of 2–13 days. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, and others affecting the respiratory, renal, and cardiac systems have been shown to increase the severity of the illness (Yang et al., 2017). However, there is lack of specific clinical symptoms to distinguish MERS-CoV from other respiratory pathogens (Butler, 2015), making it imperative that early detection and laboratory identification of coronavirus infection is performed in suspected patients. Three neighboring countries in Southeast Asia have reported MERS-CoV infections associated with a history of travel to the Middle East. In April 2014, a man in his mid-50s presented to the emergency ward of a public hospital in Malaysia. He had returned from a pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia 13 days earlier and was confirmed as the first MERS-CoV-infected case in the country (Premila Devi et al., 2014). One year later, in February 2015, a 31-year-old woman in the Philippines was also diagnosed with MERS-CoV; she had a history of being resident in Saudi Arabia as a health worker (Racelis et al., 2015). Four months later, MERS-CoV infection was also detected in an Omani citizen who had visited Thailand (Plipat et al., 2017). MERS-CoV has never been reported in Indonesia, although thousands of pilgrims have visited the Middle East every year. Despite extensive efforts to screen for MERS-CoV in 28 197 returning pilgrims in Indonesia in 2015, the study did not identify any positive cases (Amin et al., 2018). Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital (IDH) in Indonesia is one of the referral hospitals for the evaluation of MERS-CoV in suspected patients. Up until 2018, none of the suspected patients returning from the Middle East were positive for MERS-CoV, although they were screened with relevant assays. In addition, none of the specimens were further evaluated to determine other etiologies that could tailor and improve patient management and reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics. The aim of this study was to identify emerging viral etiologies in suspected MERS-CoV patients admitted to IDH by screening bio-archived respiratory samples accumulated in 2015–2016.

Methods

Ethical approval

The testing of archived specimens was approved by Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso IDH (ethical clearance number 54/VII.10/IX/2017) and the Eijkman Institute Research Ethics Commission (number 66, January 2017).

Patients, clinical data, and specimens

Clinical specimens were collected from a total of 13 hospitalized patients with suspected MERS-CoV infection in Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso IDH from July 2015 to December 2016. The majority of patients presented with pneumonia and symptoms including fever (≥37.5 °C), dyspnea, and cough. All patients had a history of travel to the Middle East <14 days prior to biological sampling. All biological specimens collected were sent to the bio-repository of Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso IDH for future research. The specimens (when available) including sputum, oropharyngeal swab, nasal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, and serum had tested negative for MERS-CoV by viral-specific PCR performed by the Indonesian Ministry of Health. The primers used in the PCR were designed to amplify the protein E, ORF1b, and ORF1a genes of MERS-CoV, as mentioned in the guidelines for MERS-CoV specimen sampling and laboratory examination of the Indonesian Ministry of Health. The specimens that had tested negative for MERS-CoV were further tested for additional respiratory viruses at the Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta. Demographic data, risk factors, and clinical data were also analyzed.

Nucleic acid extraction and reverse transcription

Total viral RNA was isolated from 140 μl of specimen (serum/respiratory swab) using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Of a total of 60 μl of viral RNA, 4 μl was added to 1 μl random primer for complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis using the GoScript Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to develop 20 μl of cDNA. The cDNA was then used as template for the detection of 12 viral families based on conventional PCR.

PCR assays for emerging viruses

Panels of a singleplex PCR assay were used for the detection of 12 taxa of viruses in respiratory specimens, including coronavirus, paramyxovirus, influenza virus, enterovirus, arenavirus, astrovirus, bocavirus, Nipah virus, adenovirus, hantavirus, herpesvirus, and respiratory syncytial virus. In addition, testing of serum for two families of arbovirus – flavivirus and alphavirus – was performed because of their endemicity in Indonesia. All of the primers and positive controls used in the amplification reaction are based on the protocols from PREDICT USAID (Anthony et al., 2013). The singleplex PCR reaction was performed in a thermal cycler ProFlex PCR system. A recombinant plasmid containing all sequences of PCR target or viral genetic materials from vaccines and isolates was used as a positive control in each PCR.

Gel visualization

Electrophoresis was done with 1% agarose gel in an electrophoresis chamber at 100 V for 30 min. Five microliters of PCR products were added to each agarose well, and a 100-bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as a DNA size marker. Visualization of positive bands was performed using the Gel Imaging BioRad Gel Doc XR System and Quantity One 1-D Analysis Software.

Sequencing

Samples with positive viral amplicons were characterized by Sanger sequencing method after purification. Purification of PCR products was performed using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by PCR sequencing and precipitation reaction before loading into an ABI 3130 sequencer. Sequencing results were analyzed using Geneious Software R8 version 8.1 and were compared with sequences in the GenBank database.

Results

During admission, 30 clinical specimens (seven oropharyngeal swabs, 11 nasal swabs, and 12 serum samples) were collected from 13 patients with pneumonia and risk factors associated with MERS-CoV infection, including history of travel to the Middle East <14 days before illness. There was no history of contact with animals or sick people during their visit. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1 . The numbers of male and female patients were similar (male-to-female ratio, 7:6), and the median age of all patients was 61 years.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics and clinical presentation of suspected MERS-CoV patients in Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital.

DemographicsPatient ID
Prevalence (Average)
MER004 072015MER012 042016MER001 092016MER011 122016MER002 092016MER009 102015MER003 042016MER013 112015MER006 102015MER005 102015MER007 102015MER008 102015MER010 092016
Age, years3266566034756537715961716157.5Median: 61 (32–75)
SexFMMMFMFFMFFMMM: 7 (53.8%)
Travel history to Middle EastaYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes1 (100%)
Purpose of travelUmrahUmrahUmrahUmrahHajjHajjUmrahHajjHajjHajjHajjHajjHajj
Date of travelMay 2015Apr 2016Sept 2016Dec 2016Sept 2016Nov 2015Apr 2016Nov 2015Sept 2015Oct 2015Oct 2015Oct 2015Sept 2016
Days of Hospitalization6NANA558735851025.8 days
DiagnosisPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumoniaPneumonia
Curb-65 severity score1000111010011
OutcomeRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecoveredRecovered
Clinical manifestations and laboratory investigations
Fever (>37.5 °C)YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes13 (100%)
CoughYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes13 (100%)
Chest painNoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoNoYesYesNoNo4 (30.8%)
Difficulty breathingYesNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes12 (92.3%)
RonchiNoNoYesYesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesYesYes9 (69.2%)
WheezingNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesYesNo2 (15.4%)
Respiratory rate (/min)2425242829282824242222273025.8
Chest radiographyInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltrationInfiltration
Leukocytes 1st (/l)4.44.926.525.231.28.520.96.28.1NA7.732.811.915.6917
Leukocytes 2nd (/l)3.0NANA12.020.79.320.48.3NANA9.332.9NA14.4875
Leukocytes 3rd (/μl)5.1NANANA17.07.312.310.4NANA19.219.1NA12.9143
Lymphocytes 1st (%)4123131343131730NA1351215.6
Lymphocytes 2nd (%)NANANA2414514NANANA194NA13.3
AntibioticsbCef, LevoCefMeroMeroMero, LevoMeroCefixMeroAziCefCef, LevoMero, LevoLevo

MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; F, female; M, male; NA, not available.

History of travel to Middle East <14 days before admission to the hospital.

Cef, ceftriaxone, Levo, levofloxacin, Mero, meropenem, Azi, azithromycin, Cefix, cefixime.

Demographic characteristics and clinical presentation of suspected MERS-CoV patients in Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso Infectious Disease Hospital. MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; F, female; M, male; NA, not available. History of travel to Middle East <14 days before admission to the hospital. Cef, ceftriaxone, Levo, levofloxacin, Mero, meropenem, Azi, azithromycin, Cefix, cefixime. All patients were diagnosed with pneumonia, confirmed by chest X-ray and categorized in the low-severity pneumonia risk group based on the British Thoracic Society guidelines (NICE, 2019). The duration of hospital stay varied between 2 and 10 days, with an average duration of 5.8 days. The patients were placed in isolation rooms dedicated for airborne infectious diseases. All patients recovered fully. A total of 18 respiratory clinical specimens that tested negative for MERS-CoV (by the Indonesian Ministry of Health) were retrospectively tested for 12 respiratory panels. In addition, 12 serum samples were tested for alphavirus and flavivirus to exclude the possibility of endemic viral infection. The coronavirus panel did not detect any MERS-CoV in any of the respiratory specimens, confirming the Indonesian Ministry of Health results. In this study, sequences of nine viral pathogens were detected in seven patients: four with single infections and three with multiple infections (Table 2 ). In patient ID MER004 072015, a co-infection of enterovirus and flavivirus was detected from nasal swab and serum, respectively. Nucleotide comparison of 357 nucleotides of the polyprotein gene using BLAST showed 99% similarity with enterovirus D68; for the flavivirus, 274 bases of the NS5 gene showed 98% similarity with dengue virus type 3. In patient ID MER002 092016, both herpesvirus and coronavirus were detected in the patient’s oropharyngeal swab. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) was identified based on sequence matching of 400 bp through the online database (NCBI). Meanwhile, nucleotide comparison of 387 bases of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene obtained from coronavirus showed 100% similarity with human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E). For patient ID MER009 102015, amplification of 400 bp untranslated region (UTR) gene of the enterovirus family and 243 bp M-gene region of influenza virus in a nasal swab revealed a rhinovirus A60 and influenza virus H1N1 (similarity 99% and 100%, respectively) co-infection. Single infections with rhinovirus C, influenza virus H3N2, human metapneumovirus (HMPV), and influenza virus H1N1 were identified in the respiratory swabs of patients with ID MER001 092016, MER007 102015, MER006 102015, and MER010 092016, respectively.
Table 2

Conventional PCR test results for viral agents from suspected MERS-CoV patients.

Patient IDSpecimenVirus panel
Sequencing results
Corona virusInfluenza virusEnterovirusPara myxovirusHerpes virusHenipavirusHanta virusArena virusAdenovirusAstrovirusRSVFlavivirusAlpha virus
MER004 072015Oropharyngeal swabNANA
Nasal swab+NANAEnterovirus D68
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA+Dengue 3 virus
MER012 042016Oropharyngeal swabNANA
Nasal swabNANA
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA
MER001 092016Nasal swab+NANARhinovirus C
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA
MER011 122016Oropharyngeal swabNANA
Nasal swabNANA
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA
MER002 092016Oropharyngeal swab-1+NANAHerpes simplex 1 virus
Oropharyngeal swab-2++NANACoronavirus 229E, herpes simplex 1 virus
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA
MER009 102015Nasal swab++Influenza virus H1N1, rhinovirus A60
MER003 042016Serum
MER013 112015Serum
MER006 102015Nasal swab-1+NANAHuman metapneumovirus
Nasal swab-2+NANAHuman metapneumovirus
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA
MER005 102015Nasal swab
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA
MER007 102015Nasal swab+Influenza virus H1N1
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA
MER008 102015Oropharyngeal swabNANA
Nasal swabNANA
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA
MER010 092016Oropharyngeal swab+NANAInfluenza virus H3N2
Nasal swab+NANAInfluenza virus H3N2
SerumNANANANANANANANANANANA

NA, not available.

Conventional PCR test results for viral agents from suspected MERS-CoV patients. NA, not available.

Discussion

Although patients with MERS-CoV usually present with an influenza-like illness, asymptomatic infection or cases with mild respiratory symptoms have also been reported (Mackay and Arden, 2017, Ahmed, 2017a). In late infection, most of the MERS-CoV patients have been reported to develop pneumonia. Age, pneumonia, and a history of travel to the Middle East are important markers of MERS-CoV (Mackay and Arden, 2015). Other factors increasing the risk of infection are male sex, contact with a camel or sick patient, diabetes mellitus, severe illness, low white blood cell count, low alanine aminotransferase, and high aspartate aminotransferase (Ahmed, 2017b). The coronavirus family panel used in this study has been validated to detect MERS-CoV (Anthony et al., 2017). However, no MERS-CoV was detected, which could be due to the small sample size. Although the severity of pneumonia of all suspected MERS-CoV patients was categorized as low risk based on the British Thoracic Society guidelines (Mackay and Arden, 2015), they would be categorized as severe pneumonia cases under the Korean guidelines, due to lung infiltrations on chest X-ray and the requirement for oxygen therapy (Park et al., 2018). A co-infection of enterovirus D68 and dengue virus type 3 was identified in patient ID MER004 072015. She was 32 years old and presented with fever, cough, wheezing, and difficulty breathing. In adults, enterovirus D68 is rarely reported as a cause of severe illness. However, the virus has attracted international attention since it was associated with community-acquired pneumonia in children in China and Italy (Esposito et al., 2015, Bosis and Esposito, 2017, Zhang et al., 2015, Esposito et al., 2016). It is possible that the pneumonia in this case was due to the enterovirus D68 infection; further phylogenetic analysis is needed to compare this strain with other enterovirus D68. In 2014, a large outbreak of enterovirus D68 was confirmed in 49 states in the USA involving at least 1153 cases and 14 deaths. Recent reports have shown a possible association between enterovirus D68 and acute flaccid paralysis (Messacar et al., 2016, Dyda et al., 2018). However, no sign of neurological disorder was observed in this patient. Patient ID MER002 092016 suffered from pneumonia, sepsis, hypoalbuminemia, and leukocytosis (26.5 × 109/l). This patient was co-infected with HCoV-229E and HSV-1. With the exception of varicella zoster and human herpesvirus 6, human herpesviruses are rarely associated with pneumonitis (Duke and Sagar, 2018, Kuwahara-Ota et al., 2018). However, one case study reported a lower respiratory tract infection caused by HSV-1 in a 72-year-old man with underlying disease (Luginbuehl et al., 2017). HSV-1 is very infectious and highly prevalent in the world, with more than 60% of the population exposed to this virus in 2012 (Looker et al., 2015). It usually causes orolabial ulcers that can lead to neurotrophic complications with lifelong potential for symptomatic or asymptomatic viral shedding episodes (Looker et al., 2015, Kaufman et al., 2005). HCoV-229E is one type of coronavirus commonly infecting humans. An epidemiological study conducted in adults with community-acquired pneumonia confirmed that four human coronaviruses (HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL-63, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-OC43) accounted for 0.6–2.5% of pneumonia cases (Yin and Wunderink, 2018). In this case, HCoV-229E was the most likely cause of pneumonia. In patient MER001 092016, rhinovirus C genetic material was detected from a nasal swab. Rhinoviruses have often been associated with pneumonia in adults. Rhinovirus C was recently discovered; this is not as well characterized as rhinoviruses A and B (Choi et al., 2015). There is controversy regarding the clinical severity of rhinovirus C infection (Choi et al., 2015, Arden et al., 2010). The virus can induce diverse clinical outcomes, with factors including species and type-specific differences as determinants of severity (Yin and Wunderink, 2018, Choi et al., 2015, Arden et al., 2010, Annamalay et al., 2016). Globally, rhinovirus C has been linked to lower respiratory tract infections such as bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia, especially when there is co-infection with other viruses, such as bocavirus and influenza virus (Langelier et al., 2017). In Indonesia, data on rhinovirus C are limited, with only one report related to myocarditis (Wiyatno et al., 2018). Influenza virus H1N1 was detected in patients MER009 102015, MER007 102015, and MER010 092016. In addition, patient MER009 102015 was co-infected with rhinovirus A60. Influenza virus H1N1 is known to cause a serious infection that can lead to the development of pneumonia and death if it progresses to acute respiratory distress syndrome. In the present study, HMPV was detected from a nasal swab of a 71-year-old patient with pneumonia. HMPV is one of the most significant causes of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in children and the elderly, especially the immunocompromised and those with underlying respiratory conditions (Oong et al., 2018, Taniguchi et al., 2019, Jallow et al., 2019). Two genotypes of HMPV have been identified, which can be classified into five lineages, A1, A2a, A2b, B1, and B2. However, their association with disease severity remains unclear (Kumar and Srivastava, 2018). There is only a single report on HMPV from Indonesia, documenting the association of HMPV lineage A1 and A2 with asthma exacerbations and pneumonia, indicating that HMPV should be screened in those with chronic and severe respiratory infections (Prasetyo et al., 2015). This study, together with that of Amin et al., strengthens the conclusion that Indonesia remained MERS-CoV-free, at least up until 2015–2016. There are some limitations to this study, such as the weakness of statistical power due to the lack of information on the total number of subjects screened and the small number of patients involved in this study. Secondly, although the specimens were mostly obtained during the acute febrile phase, beneficial for molecular screening, serology was not performed for a more comprehensive investigative approach. Thirdly, the detection of viral pathogens in swabs did not imply causality, as additional viral and bacterial panels need to be evaluated. In conclusion, the sequences of nine viral pathogens were detected in samples from seven suspected MERS-CoV patients hospitalized in Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso IDH, Indonesia. Etiological agents detected in the patient samples were enterovirus D68, dengue virus type 3, rhinovirus C, HCoV-229E, HSV-1, influenza virus H1N1, influenza virus H3N2, HMPV, and rhinovirus A60. This study also confirmed that there was no MERS-CoV genetic material detected from these 13 patients. Along with results reported by Amin et al., we confirmed that Indonesia remained MERS-CoV-free in 2015–2016. In conclusion, the early detection and identification of the etiological agent is crucial for the containment of MERS-CoV in those with a history of travel to the Middle East, and if results are negative, testing should be performed for additional pathogens to improve patient management.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to declare.

Author contributions

TYS, TSH, KSM, VL, and DS were responsible for the initial design of the study. EH and R collected samples from eligible patients and collected clinical data. TYS, AW, and EH, conducted the experiment and data analysis. TSH, R, and AKD performed the data analysis. TYS, AW, and DS wrote the first draft of the paper. All of the authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  17 in total

1.  Enterovirus D68-associated community-acquired pneumonia in children living in Milan, Italy.

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Alberto Zampiero; Luca Ruggiero; Barbara Madini; Hubert Niesters; Nicola Principi
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 2.  Enterovirus D68-Associated Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Pediatric Age Group.

Authors:  Samantha Bosis; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  HSV-1 DNA in tears and saliva of normal adults.

Authors:  Herbert E Kaufman; Ann M Azcuy; Emily D Varnell; Gregory D Sloop; Hilary W Thompson; James M Hill
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Antiviral Treatment Guidelines for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.

Authors:  Yong Pil Chong; Joon Young Song; Yu Bin Seo; Jae-Phil Choi; Hyoung-Shik Shin
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  Human herpesvirus-6 pneumonitis in a patient with follicular lymphoma following immunochemotherapy with rituximab.

Authors:  Saeko Kuwahara-Ota; Yoshiaki Chinen; Yoshimi Mizuno; Tomoko Takimoto-Shimomura; Yayoi Matsumura-Kimoto; Kazuna Tanba; Taku Tsukamoto; Shinsuke Mizutani; Yuji Shimura; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Shigeo Horiike; Junya Kuroda
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  The role of human Metapneumovirus genetic diversity and nasopharyngeal viral load on symptom severity in adults.

Authors:  Xiang Yong Oong; Jack Bee Chook; Kim Tien Ng; Wei Zhen Chow; Kok Gan Chan; Nik Sherina Hanafi; Yong Kek Pang; Yoke Fun Chan; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Kok Keng Tee
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 7.  Prophylactic and therapeutic approaches for human metapneumovirus.

Authors:  Prashant Kumar; Mansi Srivastava
Journal:  Virusdisease       Date:  2018-10-20

8.  Descriptive epidemiology and characteristics of confirmed cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in the Makkah Region of Saudi Arabia, March to June 2014.

Authors:  AbdulSalam A Noorwali; AbdulHafiz M Turkistani; Sari I Asiri; Fadel A Trabulsi; Osama M Alwafi; Saud H Alzahrani; Muhammad M Rashid; Safwat A Hegazy; Mohammed D Alzaydi; Khalid O Bawakid
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

Review 9.  MERS, SARS and other coronaviruses as causes of pneumonia.

Authors:  Yudong Yin; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 6.424

Review 10.  A review of candidate therapies for Middle East respiratory syndrome from a molecular perspective.

Authors:  Ali A Rabaan; Shamsah H Alahmed; Ali M Bazzi; Hatem M Alhani
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Potential Diagnostic Systems for Coronavirus Detection: a Critical Review.

Authors:  Elena Ekrami; Mahdi Pouresmaieli; Fatemeh Barati; Sahar Asghari; Farzad Ramezani Ziarani; Parvin Shariati; Matin Mamoudifard
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.244

Review 2.  Molecular biology of coronaviruses: current knowledge.

Authors:  I Made Artika; Aghnianditya Kresno Dewantari; Ageng Wiyatno
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-08-17

3.  Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays as a rapid diagnostic for COVID-19.

Authors:  Junaid Kashir; Ahmed Yaqinuddin
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Electrochemical investigations for COVID-19 detection-A comparison with other viral detection methods.

Authors:  Shikandar D Bukkitgar; Nagaraj P Shetti; Tejraj M Aminabhavi
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 13.273

Review 5.  Diagnostic assay and technology advancement for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections causing the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Bidhan C Dhar
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.478

6.  Global prevalence and case fatality rate of Enterovirus D68 infections, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amary Fall; Sebastien Kenmoe; Jean Thierry Ebogo-Belobo; Donatien Serge Mbaga; Arnol Bowo-Ngandji; Joseph Rodrigue Foe-Essomba; Serges Tchatchouang; Marie Amougou Atsama; Jacqueline Félicité Yéngué; Raoul Kenfack-Momo; Alfloditte Flore Feudjio; Alex Durand Nka; Chris Andre Mbongue Mikangue; Jean Bosco Taya-Fokou; Jeannette Nina Magoudjou-Pekam; Efietngab Atembeh Noura; Cromwel Zemnou-Tepap; Dowbiss Meta-Djomsi; Martin Maïdadi-Foudi; Ginette Irma Kame-Ngasse; Inès Nyebe; Larissa Gertrude Djukouo; Landry Kengne Gounmadje; Dimitri Tchami Ngongang; Martin Gael Oyono; Cynthia Paola Demeni Emoh; Hervé Raoul Tazokong; Gadji Mahamat; Cyprien Kengne-Ndé; Serge Alain Sadeuh-Mba; Ndongo Dia; Giuseppina La Rosa; Lucy Ndip; Richard Njouom
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 7.  Recent advances and perspectives of nucleic acid detection for coronavirus.

Authors:  Minzhe Shen; Ying Zhou; Jiawei Ye; Abdu Ahmed Abdullah Al-Maskri; Yu Kang; Su Zeng; Sheng Cai
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2020-03-01

Review 8.  Current methods for diagnosis of human coronaviruses: pros and cons.

Authors:  Mercy R Benzigar; Ripon Bhattacharjee; Mahroo Baharfar; Guozhen Liu
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 9.  The perspectives of biomarker-based electrochemical immunosensors, artificial intelligence and the Internet of Medical Things toward COVID-19 diagnosis and management.

Authors:  A K Yadav; D Verma; A Kumar; P Kumar; P R Solanki
Journal:  Mater Today Chem       Date:  2021-02-11

Review 10.  Recent advances in the nucleic acid-based diagnostic tool for coronavirus.

Authors:  Pranav Kumar Prabhakar; Jyoti Lakhanpal
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.