Konstantinos E Georgiou1, Rossen K Dimov2,3, Nikola B Boyanov2,4, Konstantinos G Zografos1, Andreas V Larentzakis1, Blagoi I Marinov2,5. 1. First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 2. MSTC, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. 3. Clinic of General Surgery, Kaspela University Hospital, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. 4. Clinic of Gastroenterology, Pulmed University Hospital, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. 5. Department of Pathophysiology, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stress associated with learning of a psychomotor task can influence the trainees learning ability. Surgical simulation is a validated training milieu designed to replicate real-life situations, prevent biases and provide objective metrics. However, the complexity of stress mechanisms and the absence of a reliable detection method make stress estimation difficult to quantify and to interpret. AIM: a) To assess the feasibility of a new watch-sized device to noninvasively measure stress parameters in novices during a simulation task and b) to compare its derived cardiac stress parameters to those of an ambulatory Holter monitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one novices were trained on a basic skills module. During base line, exercise, and recovery phases, all subjects wore a wearable device and data regarding blood volume pressure, heart rate, inter beat interval, electrodermal activity, and skin temperature were recorded. Additionally, Holter Monitoring was used to concomitantly capture heart rate, R-R intervals and heart rate variability. Before and after each experiment, all subjects completed the short, six-item STAI scale. RESULTS: Data analysis showed: a) when compared to STAI, electrodermal activity exhibited the best correlation, sensitivity and specificity and b) the device derived cardiac parameters highly correlated with the reciprocal Holter values during all experiment phases. CONCLUSION: This wearable device is an easy to use and well accepted by the participants noninvasive tool, which can provide accurate stress estimation in our simulation setting. Additionally, it can replicate Holter derived stress related heart parameters, thus eliminating the need to wear a rather cumbersome device.
BACKGROUND:Stress associated with learning of a psychomotor task can influence the trainees learning ability. Surgical simulation is a validated training milieu designed to replicate real-life situations, prevent biases and provide objective metrics. However, the complexity of stress mechanisms and the absence of a reliable detection method make stress estimation difficult to quantify and to interpret. AIM: a) To assess the feasibility of a new watch-sized device to noninvasively measure stress parameters in novices during a simulation task and b) to compare its derived cardiac stress parameters to those of an ambulatory Holter monitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one novices were trained on a basic skills module. During base line, exercise, and recovery phases, all subjects wore a wearable device and data regarding blood volume pressure, heart rate, inter beat interval, electrodermal activity, and skin temperature were recorded. Additionally, Holter Monitoring was used to concomitantly capture heart rate, R-R intervals and heart rate variability. Before and after each experiment, all subjects completed the short, six-item STAI scale. RESULTS: Data analysis showed: a) when compared to STAI, electrodermal activity exhibited the best correlation, sensitivity and specificity and b) the device derived cardiac parameters highly correlated with the reciprocal Holter values during all experiment phases. CONCLUSION: This wearable device is an easy to use and well accepted by the participants noninvasive tool, which can provide accurate stress estimation in our simulation setting. Additionally, it can replicate Holter derived stress related heart parameters, thus eliminating the need to wear a rather cumbersome device.
Authors: Jan M Mühlen; Julie Stang; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina-Garcia; William Johnston; Luís B Sardinha; Francisco B Ortega; Brian Caulfield; Wilhelm Bloch; Sulin Cheng; Ulf Ekelund; Jan Christian Brønd; Anders Grøntved; Moritz Schumann Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 13.800