Literature DB >> 31237824

A Critical Analysis of Medicare Claims for Otolaryngology Procedures.

Stephanie J Youssef1, Krishna S Vyas2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to outline and analyze the overall Medicare landscape with respect to otolaryngologists and beneficiaries, services, and reimbursements.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of publicly available Medicare utilization and payment data for all otolaryngologists in facility and nonfacility practice settings who provided services to Medicare beneficiaries between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016.
RESULTS: In 2016, a total of $701,195,375 was distributed to 8572 otolaryngology physician providers for 815 unique Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes for 13,942,536 procedure claims. Of specialty care, otolaryngology ranks 20th among 54 subspecialties for total Medicare payments. The average number of services coded per provider was 1627. The average otolaryngologist was paid $81,800.67. Thirty-two percent of otolaryngologists did not receive reimbursement for services from Medicare in 2016. DISCUSSION: In 2016, the most significant contributors to Medicare payments to otolaryngologists were large-scale, low-cost events that are relatively short procedures done in clinic. Utilization of nasal endoscopy was up trending from 2012 to 2016. Some of the Current Procedural Terminology codes with the greatest discrepancies between submitted charge and Medicare payment among nonfacility otolaryngology providers are more involved than simple office procedures. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is increasingly valuable for physicians to know factors that affect reimbursement for procedures and operations in different settings and to be aware of the trends in variation in their specialty. Otolaryngologists should communicate with policy makers in efforts toward sustainable reimbursement models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; United States; databases; economics; factual; health expenditures; otolaryngology; statistics and numerical data

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31237824     DOI: 10.1177/0194599819858584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  1 in total

1.  Problematic Reporting of Gender Differences in Clinical Productivity Among Otolaryngologists.

Authors:  Rusha Patel; Alexandra Kejner; Caitlin McMullen
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.