Natalia Martín-María1,2,3, Francisco Félix Caballero4,5, Marta Miret1,2,3, Stefanos Tyrovolas2,6, Josep Maria Haro2,6, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos1,2,3, Somnath Chatterji7. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Preventive Medicine, Public Health and Microbiology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 5. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública. CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain. 6. Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. 7. Department of Information, Evidence and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
Objective: Loneliness is associated with worse health status outcomes. Yet, the present study is one of the first to identify how patterns of loneliness (transient and chronic) are associated with health over time. Design: A total of 2,390 individuals were interviewed in 2011-2012 and 2014-2015 in a follow-up study conducted over a nationally representative sample of Spain. After confirming a longitudinal relationship between loneliness and health status, a growth curve mixture modeling was used to examine health trajectories. Main outcome measures: The three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale was used to assess loneliness. Health status was measured with self-reported questions regarding ten domains (vision, mobility, and self-care, among others), and seven measured tests (including grip strength, walking speed and immediate and delayed verbal recall). Results: A quarter of participants were lonely at baseline. Both the group of transient and chronic loneliness showed a negative significant relationship with health status at follow-up, (β = -0.063 and β = -0.075 respectively, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, the health status did not change across time in any group. Conclusion: People experiencing chronic loneliness had the worst health status. Different patterns of loneliness could benefit from the appropriate interventions.
Objective: Loneliness is associated with worse health status outcomes. Yet, the present study is one of the first to identify how patterns of loneliness (transient and chronic) are associated with health over time. Design: A total of 2,390 individuals were interviewed in 2011-2012 and 2014-2015 in a follow-up study conducted over a nationally representative sample of Spain. After confirming a longitudinal relationship between loneliness and health status, a growth curve mixture modeling was used to examine health trajectories. Main outcome measures: The three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale was used to assess loneliness. Health status was measured with self-reported questions regarding ten domains (vision, mobility, and self-care, among others), and seven measured tests (including grip strength, walking speed and immediate and delayed verbal recall). Results: A quarter of participants were lonely at baseline. Both the group of transient and chronic loneliness showed a negative significant relationship with health status at follow-up, (β = -0.063 and β = -0.075 respectively, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, the health status did not change across time in any group. Conclusion:People experiencing chronic loneliness had the worst health status. Different patterns of loneliness could benefit from the appropriate interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Transient loneliness; chronic loneliness; health status; longitudinal study
Authors: Shishir Baliyan; José Manuel Cimadevilla; Matias M Pulopulos; Leyre Castillejo; Carmen Sandi; César Venero Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-04-28
Authors: Timothy Matthews; Pamela Qualter; Bridget T Bryan; Avshalom Caspi; Andrea Danese; Terrie E Moffitt; Candice L Odgers; Lily Strange; Louise Arseneault Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2022-02-03
Authors: Ashwin A Kotwal; Stephanie Batio; Michael S Wolf; Kenneth E Covinsky; Julia Yoshino Benavente; Carla M Perissinotto; Rachel M O'Conor Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Megan E Marziali; Taylor McLinden; Kiffer G Card; Kalysha Closson; Lu Wang; Jason Trigg; Kate Salters; Viviane D Lima; Surita Parashar; Robert S Hogg Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-02