| Literature DB >> 31237436 |
T C Onstott1, B L Ehlmann2,3, H Sapers2,3,4, M Coleman3,5, M Ivarsson6, J J Marlow7, A Neubeck8, P Niles9.
Abstract
Here we review published studies on the abundance and diversity of terrestrial rock-hosted life, the environments it inhabits, the evolution of its metabolisms, and its fossil biomarkers to provide guidance in the search for life on Mars. Key findings are (1) much terrestrial deep subsurface metabolic activity relies on abiotic energy-yielding fluxes and in situ abiotic and biotic recycling of metabolic waste products rather than on buried organic products of photosynthesis; (2) subsurface microbial cell concentrations are highest at interfaces with pronounced chemical redox gradients or permeability variations and do not correlate with bulk host rock organic carbon; (3) metabolic pathways for chemolithoautotrophic microorganisms evolved earlier in Earth's history than those of surface-dwelling phototrophic microorganisms; (4) the emergence of the former occurred at a time when Mars was habitable, whereas the emergence of the latter occurred at a time when the martian surface was not continually habitable; (5) the terrestrial rock record has biomarkers of subsurface life at least back hundreds of millions of years and likely to 3.45 Ga with several examples of excellent preservation in rock types that are quite different from those preserving the photosphere-supported biosphere. These findings suggest that rock-hosted life would have been more likely to emerge and be preserved in a martian context. Consequently, we outline a Mars exploration strategy that targets subsurface life and scales spatially, focusing initially on identifying rocks with evidence for groundwater flow and low-temperature mineralization, then identifying redox and permeability interfaces preserved within rock outcrops, and finally focusing on finding minerals associated with redox reactions and associated traces of carbon and diagnostic chemical and isotopic biosignatures. Using this strategy on Earth yields ancient rock-hosted life, preserved in the fossil record and confirmable via a suite of morphologic, organic, mineralogical, and isotopic fingerprints at micrometer scale. We expect an emphasis on rock-hosted life and this scale-dependent strategy to be crucial in the search for life on Mars.Entities:
Keywords: Biosignatures; Mars; Microbial diversity; Search for life; Subsurface life
Year: 2019 PMID: 31237436 PMCID: PMC6786346 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2018.1960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Astrobiology ISSN: 1557-8070 Impact factor: 4.335

Subsurface biosphere habitats from left to right: Ice and Ice-Rock Interfaces host chemolithotrophs; Marine or Lake Sediments host primarily heterotrophic communities in a high-porosity environment with diffusive flux fueled by organic photosynthate in some places and chemolithotrophic oxidation in others; Ocean Ridges have advective fluids carrying reductants and oxidants, including dissolved gases from magma and water-rock reactions, and abiotic hydrocarbons are oxidized to carbonate mounds (magmatic, non-ridge systems may provide such fluxes on other planets); Deep Basaltic Crust has H2-fueled chemolithotrophic communities powered by water-rock reactions; Continental Sedimentary Aquifers are of lower porosity than marine sediments/crust and host mixed heterotrophic and chemolithotrophic communities; and Deep Subsurface Continental aquifers in mafic and siliceous igneous and metamorphic rocks, in some cases fractured by impacts or tectonics, host microorganisms fed by products of radiolysis and water-rock reactions.

Cartoon of different microbial metabolic processes separated into Aerobic (top), Anaerobic (bottom), Heterotrophic (left), and Autotrophic (right) bins.

(A) Cell concentrations versus depth for ice sheets, subglacial sediments, and permafrost. Open squares = Tibetan glacial ice sheets; brown-filled diamonds = Siberian permafrost; blue-filled diamonds = Siberian cryopeg; light gray-filled triangles = Antarctica ice sheets and lakes; brown-filled triangles = Antarctic subglacial sediments; brown crosses = Antarctic permafrost and subglacial sediment in New Zealand; orange crosses = Canadian High Arctic and Svalbard permafrost; light blue–filled circles = Greenland ice sheet; orange-filled circle = Greenland subglacial sediment. (B) Cell concentrations versus depth for rock and soil cores from nonpolar regions. Orange-filled circle = water-saturated sediments or sedimentary rock; orange open circle = vadose zone sediments or sedimentary rock; brown squares = Chesapeake Bay Impact sediments; pink squares = Chesapeake Bay Impact impactite; black-filled orange circle = oil-gas-coal-bearing sediment or sedimentary rock; gray-filled gray diamond = water saturated rhyolitic ash; open gray diamond = deep vadose zone rhyolitic ash; open black diamond = vadose zone basaltic rock; gray-filled black diamond = water-saturated basaltic rock, which includes recent Deccan Trap data from Dutta et al. (2018); red-filled diamond = Deccan Trap granite data from Dutta et al. (2018); purple square = metamorphic rock. Rest of data are from Magnabosco et al. (2018a). Blue open circles = Atacama desert soil from Connon et al. (2007) and Lester et al. (2007). Solid and dashed lines represent the best-fit power law for subseafloor sediments proposed by Parkes et al. (2014).
Subsurface Biomarkers Preserved in Geological Record
| 0.6 | x | filaments | Sea Mounts | 1 | ||||
| 1 | x | x | filaments | Ries Impact Crater | 2, 3 | |||
| 2 | x | x | x | concretions | Navajo Sandstone | 4 | ||
| 3.4–44 | x | Cretaceous shale | 5, 6 | |||||
| 15 | x | x | microcolonies | Columbia River Basalt | 7 | |||
| 31 | x | x | x | ichnofossils | sea floor basalt | 8 | ||
| 48 | x | x | filaments | Sea Mounts | 9, 10 | |||
| 56 | x | x | filaments | Sea Mounts | 9 | |||
| 60 | x | x | concretions | Moeraki Formation | 11 | |||
| 81 | x | x | filaments | Sea Mounts | 9 | |||
| 84 | x | x | concretions | Gammon Shale | 12 | |||
| 88.5 | x | x | x | concretions | Mancos Shale Formation | 13 | ||
| 91 | x | x | x | concretions | Frontier Formation | 13 | ||
| 95 | x | x | x | concretions | Frontier Formation | 13 | ||
| 92 | x | x | ichnofossils | Troodos ophiolite | 14, 15 | |||
| 0.115–400 | x | x | x | x | x | microcolonies | Fennoscandian shield granite | 16–18 |
| 120 | x | x | x | x | x | microcolonies | Southern Iberia Abyssal Plain | 19 |
| 152 | x | x | concretions | Kimmeridge Clay | 20 | |||
| 173 ± 8 | x | Fennoscandian shield granite | 21 | |||||
| 180 | x | x | concretions | Upper Lias | 22 | |||
| 250 | x | x | reduction spheroids | Mercia Mudstone Group | 23 | |||
| 315 | x | x | concretions | Lower Westphalian coal | 24 | |||
| 355 ± 14 | x | x | x | filaments | Fennoscandian shield granite | 21 | ||
| 358–394 | x | x | x | Fennoscandian shield granite | 21, 24 | |||
| 385 | x | x | x | filaments | Arnstein pillow basalt | 25, 26 | ||
| 388 | x | filaments | Tynet Burn limestone | 27 | ||||
| 443 | x | x | ichnofossils | Caledonian ophiolite | 28 | |||
| 458 | x | x | filaments | Lockne Impact Structure | 29 | |||
| 551 | x | x | concretions | Doushantuo Formation | 30 | |||
| 1175 | x | reduction spheroids | Bay of Stoer Formation | 23 | ||||
| 1950 | x | x | ichnofossils | Jormua ophiolite complex | 31 | |||
| 2400 | x | filaments | Ongeluk Formation sea floor basalt | 32 | ||||
| 2900–3350 | x | x | x | ichnofossils | Euro Basalt | 33, 34 | ||
| 3240 | x | filaments | Sulphur Springs Group | 35 | ||||
| 3300 | x | Barberton Greenstone Belt | 36 | |||||
| 3460 | x | Dresser Formation | 37 | |||||
| 3465 | x | x | x | microcolonies | Apex Chert | 38 | ||
| 3465 | x | microcolonies | Apex Chert | 39 | ||||
| 3465 | x | Apex Chert | 40 | |||||
| 3465 | x | x | ichnofossils | Hooggenoeg Formation | 41, 42 | |||
| 3770–4280 | x | filaments | Nuvvuagittuq belt | 43 | ||||
Ivarsson et al. (2015), 2Sapers et al. (2014), 3Sapers et al. (2015), 4Loope et al. (2010), 5Ringelberg et al. (1997), 6Elliott et al. (1999), 7McKinley et al. (2000), 8Cavalazzi et al. (2011), 9Ivarsson et al. (2009), 10Ivarsson et al. (2012), 11Thyne and Boles (1989), 12Coleman (1993), 13Mcbride et al. (2003), 14Furnes et al. (2001), 15Wacey et al. (2014), 16Pedersen et al. (1997), 17Drake et al. (2015a), 18Drake et al. (2015b), 19Klein et al. (2015), 20Irwin (1980), 21Drake et al. (2017a), 22Coleman and Raiswell (1995), 23Spinks et al. (2010), 24Curtis et al. (1986), 25Drake et al. (2018), 25Eickmann et al. (2009), 26Peckmann et al. (2007), 27Trewin and Knoll (1999), 28Furnes et al. (2002), 29Ivarsson et al. (2013), 30Dong et al. (2008), 31Furnes et al. (2005), 32Bengtson et al. (2017), 33Banerjee et al. (2007), 34McLoughlin et al. (2012), 35Rasmussen (2000), 36Ohmoto et al. (1993), 37Shen and Buick (2004), 38Schopf et al. (2018), 39Pinti et al. (2009), 40Ueno et al. (2006), 41Banerjee et al. (2006), 42Furnes et al. (2004), 43Dodd et al. (2017).

Present understanding of rock-hosted life over time. The currently recognized biosignatures of rock-hosted life from Table 1 are plotted as a function of time along with the timing of development of microbial metabolisms from molecular clock techniques, as discussed in the text. Earth's geologic timescale, Earth's oxidation, and the era of surface stability of water on Mars are also shown.

Increasing scale of metabolic footprint of subsurface life. (A) Single microbial cells attached to clay minerals of a 2.8 km deep fracture zone (Wanger et al., 2006). (B) Framboidal pyrite sack with organic mineralization from 1.5 km deep borehole. White arrow points to single bacterial cell (Maclean et al., 2008). (C) Centimeter-scale “Pseudostalactite” of quartz and goethite cemented by biogenic filaments occurring in Tertiary volcanic rocks in California (Hofmann and Farmer, 2000). (D) Ferroan carbonate septarian concretions from 88.5 Ma in the Ferron Sandstone Member of the Mancos Shale Formation in Utah that are 1–4 m in diameter (McBride et al., 2003). (E) Surface diagenetic alteration zones and traces of pre-Permian faults over Velma field, Stephens County, Oklahoma, 1 mile scale bar (Al-Shaieb et al., 1994).
Steps to Search for Rock-Hosted Life on Mars
| 1. Identify rocks with ancient subsurface habitats | <100 m sampling | Ability to identify water-related mineral deposits from orbit and determine stratigraphic context |
| 2. Locate interfaces that represent favorable locations for rock life | Meter- to centimeter-scale | Ability to identify redox and permeability interfaces by identification of distinct lithologic units |
| 3. Search for mineralization from fluid flow at interfaces | Centimeter- and millimeter-scale | Ability to identify silica, carbonate, sulfate, phyllosilicate, and oxides that may mineralize microbial life |
| 4. Search for organics, mineralization, and isotopic anomalies at the interface | <100 μm sampling | Ability to detect organics, chemical, mineralogic, and/or isotopic differences between interface rocks and surrounding rocks indicative of biosignatures |
| 5. Map putative biosignatures in 3-D, tracking chemical and organic variations with texture | <1 μm sampling in 3 dimensions | Ability to identify microbial textures and distinguish biotic and abiotic processes to confirm definitively fossil rock-hosted life |