Literature DB >> 31237329

The CRISP-P study: feasibility of a self-completed colorectal cancer risk prediction tool in primary care.

Elena C Harty1, Jennifer G McIntosh1, Adrian Bickerstaffe2, Nadira Hewabandu2, Jon D Emery1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) globally. Our research team has developed a CRC risk prediction tool for use in primary care to increase targeted screening. This study, Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction tool - patient ('CRISP-P'), aimed to determine the following to inform a future trial design: (i) the feasibility of self-reporting; (ii) the feasibility of recruitment methods; and (iii) the prevalence of CRC risk.
METHODS: Participants aged between 40 and 75 years were recruited consecutively from three primary care waiting rooms. Participants input data into CRISP on a tablet without receiving clinical advice. Feasibility was evaluated using recruitment rate, timely completion, a self-reported 'ease-of-use', score and field notes. Prevalence of CRC risk was calculated using the CRISP model.
RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-one (90%) patients agreed to use the tool and 424 (84%) rated the tool easy to use. Despite this, 41% of people were unable to complete the questions without assistance. Patients who were older, without tertiary education or with English as their second language were more likely to require assistance (P < 0.001). Thirty-nine percent of patients were low risk, 58% at slightly increased and 2.4% were at moderately increased risk of developing colorectal cancer in the next 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The tool was perceived as easy to use, although older, less educated people, and patients with English as their second language needed help. The data support the recruitment methods but not the use of a self-completed tool for an efficacy trial. © Crown copyright 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  family practice; general practice; humans; primary health care; self-report; tablets

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31237329     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmz029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  4 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.

Authors:  J M Cairns; S Greenley; O Bamidele; D Weller
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 2.532

2.  Feasibility of Utilizing PREMM Score for Lynch Syndrome Identification in an Urban, Minority Patient Population.

Authors:  Brigid Adviento; Michael Conner; Alexander Sarkisian; Nicolette Walano; Hans Andersson; Jordan Karlitz
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

3.  Commentary: Pivoting during a pandemic: developing a new recruitment model for a randomised controlled trial in response to COVID-19.

Authors:  Shakira Milton; Jennifer McIntosh; Lucy Boyd; Napin Karnchanachari; Finlay Macrae; Jon David Emery
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Leveraging Health Information Technology to Collect Family Cancer History: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Ryan M Kahn; Noelani Wing; Zhen Ni Zhou; Andreas Ian Lackner; Hannah Krinsky; Nora Badiner; Rhea Fogla; Isabel Wolfe; Hannah Bergeron; Becky Baltich Nelson; Charlene Thomas; Paul J Christos; Ravi N Sharaf; Evelyn Cantillo; Kevin Holcomb; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Melissa K Frey
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.