Literature DB >> 31235981

A Comprehensive IRT Approach for Modeling Binary, Graded, and Continuous Responses With Error in Persons and Items.

Pere J Ferrando1.   

Abstract

Dual item response theory (IRT) models in which items and individuals have different amounts of measurement error have been proposed in the literature. Any developments in these models, however, are feasible only for continuous responses. This article discusses a comprehensive dual modeling approach, based on underlying latent response variables, from which specific models for continuous, graded, and binary responses are obtained. Procedures for (a) calibrating the items, (b) scoring individuals, (c) assessing model appropriateness, and (d) assessing measurement precision are discussed for all the resulting models. Simulation results suggest that the proposal is quite feasible. A practical illustration is given with an empirical example in the personality domain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  factor analysis; item discrimination; item response theory; person reliability; personality measurement

Year:  2018        PMID: 31235981      PMCID: PMC6572909          DOI: 10.1177/0146621618817779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  10 in total

1.  Theoretical and Empirical Comparisons between Two Models for Continuous Item Response.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  A Factor-Analytic Model for Assessing Individual Differences in Response Scale Usage.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  A graded response model for measuring person reliability.

Authors:  Pere Joan Ferrando
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Response Inconsistency of Patient-Reported Symptoms as a Predictor of Discrepancy Between Patient and Clinician-Reported Depression Severity.

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; Wilco H M Emons; Bethan F Page; Klaas Sijtsma; Willem Van der Does; Ingrid V E Carlier; Erik J Giltay
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2016-09-14

5.  An IRT Modeling Approach for Assessing Item and Person Discrimination in Binary Personality Responses.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-01-04

6.  Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences.

Authors:  Han L J van der Maas; Dylan Molenaar; Gunter Maris; Rogier A Kievit; Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Consistent Differential Discrimination Model Estimation.

Authors:  Dirk Lubbe; Christof Schuster
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

9.  The Graded Response Differential Discrimination Model Accounting for Extreme Response Style.

Authors:  Dirk Lubbe; Christof Schuster
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  ITEMS AND PERSONS: FORMAL DUALS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES.

Authors:  D W Fiske
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1968-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  InDisc: An R Package for Assessing Person and Item Discrimination in Typical-Response Measures.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando; David Navarro-González
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-03-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.