Literature DB >> 31235205

Parametric Study of Acoustic Droplet Vaporization Thresholds and Payload Release From Acoustically-Responsive Scaffolds.

Xiaofang Lu1, Xiaoxiao Dong2, Sam Natla1, Oliver D Kripfgans3, J Brian Fowlkes3, Xueding Wang4, Renny Franceschi5, Andrew J Putnam6, Mario L Fabiilli7.   

Abstract

Hydrogels are commonly used for the delivery of bioactive molecules, especially growth factors and cytokines capable of stimulating tissue regeneration. Regenerative processes are regulated by the concentrations and spatiotemporal presentations of these molecules. With conventional hydrogels, these critical delivery parameters cannot be actively modulated after implantation. We have developed composite hydrogel scaffolds where payload release is non-invasively modulated, in an on-demand manner, using ultrasound (US). These acoustically-responsive scaffolds (ARSs) consist of a fibrin matrix doped with a payload-carrying, perfluorocarbon (PFC) double emulsion. Previously, acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV) was used to trigger release of a pro-angiogenic growth factor, encapsulated in the ARS, which stimulated blood vessel formation in vivo. In the present study, we assess how characteristics of the monodispersed emulsion, fibrin matrix, and US impact ADV thresholds and the release efficiency of a dextran payload. ADV thresholds increased with the molecular weight of the PFC in the emulsion and inversely with the volume fraction of emulsion in the ARS. Payload release from ARSs with perfluoroheptane (C7) or perfluorooctane (C8) emulsions was dependent on the number of z-planes of US used to generate ADV and inversely dependent on the lateral spacing. Conversely, release from ARSs with perfluoropentane (C5) or perfluorohexane (C6) emulsions was less dependent on these US exposure parameters. After ADV, payload diffusion decreased significantly in ARSs with C5 or C6 emulsions compared with ARSs with C7 or C8 emulsions. The expansion of the ARS after ADV decreased with the molecular weight of the PFC. Non-selective release increased with the molecular weight of the PFC and thrombin concentration. Overall, these findings can be used for optimization of ARS properties and US parameters in future therapeutic applications.
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic droplet vaporization; Controlled release; Fibrin; Perfluorocarbon; Ultrasound

Year:  2019        PMID: 31235205      PMCID: PMC6689245          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  52 in total

1.  Molecular diffusion in tissue-engineered cartilage constructs: effects of scaffold material, time, and culture conditions.

Authors:  Holly A Leddy; Hani A Awad; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.368

2.  On the acoustic vaporization of micrometer-sized droplets.

Authors:  Oliver D Kripfgans; Mario L Fabiilli; Paul L Carson; J Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Study of factors affecting the magnitude and nature of ultrasound exposure with in vitro set-ups.

Authors:  Jarkko J Leskinen; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imaging in Vivo with Transient Laser-Activated Nanodroplets.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Luke; Alexander S Hannah; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  In vitro and in vivo assessment of controlled release and degradation of acoustically responsive scaffolds.

Authors:  Alexander Moncion; Keith J Arlotta; Eric G O'Neill; Melissa Lin; Lily A Mohr; Renny T Franceschi; Oliver D Kripfgans; Andrew J Putnam; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Growth on demand: reviewing the mechanobiology of stretched skin.

Authors:  Alexander M Zöllner; Maria A Holland; Kord S Honda; Arun K Gosain; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-04-03

7.  An in vitro study of a phase-shift nanoemulsion: a potential nucleation agent for bubble-enhanced HIFU tumor ablation.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Tyrone Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Improvements in the ultrasonic contrast of targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles using an acoustic transmission line model.

Authors:  Jon N Marsh; Christopher S Hall; Michael J Scott; Ralph W Fuhrhop; Patrick J Gaffney; Samuel A Wickline; Gregory M Lanza
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Sequential release of nanoparticle payloads from ultrasonically burstable capsules.

Authors:  Stephen Kennedy; Jennifer Hu; Cathal Kearney; Hadas Skaat; Luo Gu; Marco Gentili; Herman Vandenburgh; David Mooney
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Spatial and temporal profiles of growth factor expression during CNS demyelination reveal the dynamics of repair priming.

Authors:  Viktoria Gudi; Jelena Škuljec; Özlem Yildiz; Konstantin Frichert; Thomas Skripuletz; Darius Moharregh-Khiabani; Elke Voss; Kirsten Wissel; Sabine Wolter; Martin Stangel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal control of micromechanics and microstructure in acoustically-responsive scaffolds using acoustic droplet vaporization.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Christopher D Davidson; William Y Wang; Oliver D Kripfgans; Renny T Franceschi; Andrew J Putnam; J Brian Fowlkes; Brendon M Baker; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.679

2.  Spatially-directed cell migration in acoustically-responsive scaffolds through the controlled delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor.

Authors:  Xiaofang Lu; Hai Jin; Carole Quesada; Easton C Farrell; Leidan Huang; Mitra Aliabouzar; Oliver D Kripfgans; J Brian Fowlkes; Renny T Franceschi; Andrew J Putnam; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Acoustic Droplet Vaporization in Acoustically Responsive Scaffolds: Effects of Frequency of Excitation, Volume Fraction and Threshold Determination Method.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Xiaofang Lu; Oliver D Kripfgans; J Brian Fowlkes; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Spatiotemporal control of myofibroblast activation in acoustically-responsive scaffolds via ultrasound-induced matrix stiffening.

Authors:  Easton Farrell; Mitra Aliabouzar; Carole Quesada; Brendon M Baker; Renny T Franceschi; Andrew J Putnam; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Release of basic fibroblast growth factor from acoustically-responsive scaffolds promotes therapeutic angiogenesis in the hind limb ischemia model.

Authors:  Hai Jin; Carole Quesada; Mitra Aliabouzar; Oliver D Kripfgans; Renny T Franceschi; Jianhua Liu; Andrew J Putnam; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 11.467

6.  Spatially-directed angiogenesis using ultrasound-controlled release of basic fibroblast growth factor from acoustically-responsive scaffolds.

Authors:  Leidan Huang; Carole Quesada; Mitra Aliabouzar; J Brian Fowlkes; Renny T Franceschi; Zheng Liu; Andrew J Putnam; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 10.633

7.  Ultrasound-Induced Mechanical Compaction in Acoustically Responsive Scaffolds Promotes Spatiotemporally Modulated Signaling in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Brock A Humphries; Mitra Aliabouzar; Carole Quesada; Avinash Bevoor; Kenneth K Y Ho; Alex Farfel; Johanna M Buschhaus; Shrila Rajendran; Mario L Fabiilli; Gary D Luker
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 11.092

8.  Using Acoustic Fields to Fabricate ECM-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine Applications.

Authors:  Emma G Norris; Diane Dalecki; Denise C Hocking
Journal:  Recent Prog Mater       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 9.  Making waves: how ultrasound-targeted drug delivery is changing pharmaceutical approaches.

Authors:  Lauren J Delaney; Selin Isguven; John R Eisenbrey; Noreen J Hickok; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Mater Adv       Date:  2022-02-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.