Literature DB >> 31235063

Usefulness of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Hui Peng1, Zhijun Sun1, Hui Chen1, Yue Zhang1, Xiaosong Ding1, Xue-Qiao Zhao2, Hongwei Li3.   

Abstract

The prognostic value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention remains uncertain. We examine the association of the CHA2DS2-VASc score and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in this population and compared its risk prediction with 2 other commonly used risk scores (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE] and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI]). A total of 3,745 consecutive ACS patients without AF who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during 2013 to 2017 were classified into 4 groups according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score: low (0 to 1), moderate (2 to 3), high (4 to 5), and very high (>5). Incidences of MACE including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke in-hospital and during a median follow-up of 33 months were compared among the 4 groups. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated to compare CHA2DS2-VASc with GRACE and TIMI for risk prediction. The incidences of in-hospital MACE (3.5%, 6.6%, 7.6%, and 9.1%, p <0.001) and mid-term follow-up MACE (4.5%, 7.1%, 13.1%, and 16.1%, p <0.001) were significantly higher as the CHA2DS2-VASc score increased. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was an independent predictor of subsequent MACE (hazard ratio = 1.31, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.39, p <0.001), and the very high-risk score group showed 3.8-fold increased risk of MACE than the low-risk score group. Receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that the CHA2DS2-VASc score was comparable to the GRACE score and to TIMI-STEMI, but, better than the TIMI-NSTEMI/unstable angina pectoris score in terms of predicting MACE. In conclusion, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with increased risk of MACE in the ACS patients without AF who underwent PCI.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31235063     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Usefulness of CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for predicting incident atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients.

Authors:  Yuzhong Wu; Zengshuo Xie; Weihao Liang; Ruicong Xue; Zexuan Wu; Dexi Wu; Jiangui He; Wengen Zhu; Chen Liu
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-01-27

2.  Untangling the difficult interplay between ischemic and hemorrhagic risk: The role of risk scores.

Authors:  Simone Persampieri; Diego Castini; Alessandro Lupi; Marco Guazzi
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-26

3.  Prognostic value of GRACE and CHA2DS2-VASc score among patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Tingting Guo; Ziwei Xi; Hong Qiu; Yong Wang; Jianfeng Zheng; Kefei Dou; Bo Xu; Shubin Qiao; Weixian Yang; Runlin Gao
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  Novel scoring system based on clinical examination for prediction of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miftah Pramudyo; Transiska Liesmadona Bijaksana; Achmad Fauzi Yahya; Iwan Cahyo Santosa Putra
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-10

5.  Association of CHA2DS2-VASC Score with in-Hospital Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Caoyang Fang; Zhenfei Chen; Jing Zhang; Xiaoqin Jin; Mengsi Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.149

6.  Clinical risk predictors in atrial fibrillation patients following successful coronary stenting: ENTRUST-AF PCI sub-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Goette; Lars Eckardt; Marco Valgimigli; Thorsten Lewalter; Petra Laeis; Paul-Egbert Reimitz; Rüdiger Smolnik; Wolfgang Zierhut; Jan G Tijssen; Pascal Vranckx
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 5.460

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.