| Literature DB >> 31234955 |
Jun-Ho Lee1, Soo-Bong Choi2, Dong-Jun Sung3, Mingli Jin4, Ju-Han Lee5, Ji-Young Mun6, Tae-Sook Hwang7, Sang-Don Han8, Young-Tae Ro5, Sung-Young Kim5, Jueng-Soo You5, Inja Lim9, Yun-Hee Noh5.
Abstract
While liver histopathology is heterogeneous in diabetes, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated whether glycemic variation resulting from differential diets can induce heterogeneity in diabetic liver and the underlying molecular mechanisms. We generated end-stage non-obese diabetic model rats by subtotal-pancreatectomy in male Sprague- Dawley rats and ad libitum diet for 7 weeks (n = 33). The rats were then divided into three groups, and fed a standard- or a low-protein diet (18 or 6 kcal%, respectively), for another 7 weeks: to maintain hyperglycemia, 11 rats were fed ad libitum (18AL group); to achieve euglycemia, 11 were calorierestricted (18R group), and 11 were both calorie- and proteinrestricted with the low-protein diet (6R group). Overnightfasted liver samples were collected after the differential diets together with sham-control (18S group), and histology and molecular changes were compared. Hyperglycemic-18AL showed glycogenic hepatopathy (GH) without steatosis, with the highest GSK-3β inactivation because of Akt activation during hyperglycemia; mitochondrial function was not impaired, compared to the 18S group. Euglycemic-18R showed neither GH nor steatosis, with intermediate GSK-3β activation and mitochondrial dysfunction. However, euglycemic-6R showed both GH and steatosis despite the highest GSK-3β activity and no molecular evidence of increased lipogenesis or decreased ApoB expression, where mitochondrial dysfunction was highest among the groups. In conclusion, heterogeneous liver histopathology developed in end-stage non-obese diabetic rats as the glycemic levels varied with differential diets, in which protein content in the diets as well as glycemic levels differentially influenced GSK-3β activity and mitochondrial function in insulin-deficient state. [BMB Reports 2020; 53(2): 100-105].Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31234955 PMCID: PMC7061207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMB Rep ISSN: 1976-6696 Impact factor: 4.778
Fig. 1Heterogeneity in liver histopathology, hepatic glycogen and TG contents, and serum hepatic enzymes when fed differential diets in end-stage non-obese model diabetic rats generated by subtotal-pancreatectomy. (A-C) Sequential changes in (A) the rate of daily food intake, (B) fasting blood glucose, and (C) body weight by the study schedule. (D, E) Liver histopathology demonstrated by (D) H&E and (E) PAS staining. Hepatic content of (F) glycogen and (G) TG. Serum level of (H) AST and (I) ALT. Rats were treated as described in the Table 1 legend. 18S (○), 18AL (■), 18R (), and 6R (X). Data are presented as the means ± SD (n = 11 per group). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ***P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.001 vs 18S; †††P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, †P < 0.001 vs 18AL.
Plasma insulin and C-peptide, and serum lipid profiles
| 18S | 18AL | 18R | 6R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin (mU/L) | 39.8 ± 22.6 | 4.7 ± 2.4 | 3.3 ± 2.0 | 2.2 ±1.9 |
| C-peptide (nmol/mL) | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 218.6 ± 66.9 | 183.3 ± 96.5 | 184.5 ± 70.5 | 163.7 ± 31.6 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 142.3 ± 34.8 | 100.8 ± 26.3 | 64.3 ± 16.2 | 82.6 ± 24.6 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 86.0 ± 19.5 | 47.1 ± 9.2 | 51.1 ± 8.7 | 59.9 ± 12.0 |
18S, sham-operated control rats on a standard chow ad libitum (protein 18, carbohydrate 62, lipid 20 kcal%), showing euglycemia throughout the study; end-stage non-obese diabetic model rats generated by subtotal-pancreatectomy on the standard chow ad libitum to maintain hyperglycemia (18AL), on a calorie-restricted diet to achieve euglycemia with the standard chow (18R), or with a low-protein chow (6R; protein 6, carbohydrate 74, lipid 20 kcal%) during the differential diet period [the rate of food intake (g/kg of body weight/day) of both R groups was the same as that in the 18S group]. Data are presented as the means ± SD. (n = 11 per group). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test; *P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, vs 18S; †P < 0.05, vs 18AL.
Fig. 2Heterogeneity in the ultrastructure of hepatocytes and activities of regulatory factors for hepatic glycogen or lipid synthesis. (A) Liver TEM images. (B-D) Molecular variations in the regulatory factors for glycogen synthesis determined by (B) western blotting for Akt and GSK-3β, and by densitometry for (C) pAkt:Akt and (D) pGSK-3β:GSK-3β in the liver. (E-G) Molecular variations in the regulatory factors for lipid synthesis determined by (E) western blotting for SREBP-1c and ACC, and by densitometry for (F) SREBP-1c and (G) pACC:ACC in the liver. (H) mRNA expression for apolipoprotein B in the liver determined by DCt values after real-time RT-PCR. Rats were treated as described in the Table 1 legend. Data are presented as the means ± SD (n = 5 per group). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Arrowheads, autophagosomes; Arrows, glycogen particles; Asterisks, lipid droplets.
Fig. 3Molecular mechanisms of differential liver weights and nutrient accumulation in the livers of end-stage non-obese model diabetic rats on differential diets. (A-E) AMPK activation by (A) western blotting and (B) densitometry, (C) liver weight, and LC3-II:LC3-I determined by (D) western blotting and (E) densitometry. (F-I) Mitochondrial function in terms of (F) mitochondrial number, and the levels of COX I and COX IV determined by (G) western blotting, and densitometry for (H) COX I and (I) COX IV, respectively. (J, K) The level of G6Ptase determined by (J) western blotting and (K) densitometry. Rats were treated as described in the Table 1 legend. Data are presented as the means ± SD (liver weight, n = 11 per group; western blotting n = 5 per group). The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test.