| Literature DB >> 31234939 |
Priscilla D S Ventura1, Carolina P F Carvalho1, Nilana M T Barros2, Leonardo Martins-Silva3, Edilson O Dantas4, Carolina Martinez1, Pollyana M S Melo3, João B Pesquero3, Adriana K Carmona3, Marcia R Nagaoka1, Marcos L Gazarini5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria represents a worldwide medical emergency affecting mainly poor areas. Plasmodium parasites during blood stages can release kinins to the extracellular space after internalization of host kininogen inside erythrocytes and these released peptides could represent an important mechanism in liver pathophysiology by activation of calcium signaling pathway in endothelial cells of vertebrate host. Receptors (B1 and B2) activated by kinins peptides are important elements for the control of haemodynamics in liver and its physiology. The aim of this study was to identify changes in the liver host responses (i.e. kinin receptors expression and localization) and the effect of ACE inhibition during malaria infection using a murine model.Entities:
Keywords: Captopril; Kinin receptors; Liver; Malaria; Plasmodium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31234939 PMCID: PMC6591901 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2846-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Plasmodium chabaudi parasitaemia in mice treated or not with captopril, chloroquine or both drugs (n = 6). a Blood parasitaemia of infected groups with vehicle solution (INF), captopril (CP), chloroquine (CQ), chloroquine and captopril association (CQ CP) (n = 6). b Survival curve of each animal group showed in A (n = 6). c ACE activity measured with Abz-FRK(Dnp)P-OH in blood plasma from mice of infected groups with vehicle solution (INF) or treated with CP. (n = 3). One-way ANOVA with multiple comparison post-test of Bonferroni’s; *p < 0.05, compared with the respective control of treatment (INF, without CP)
Fig. 2Survival of bradykinin receptor B1 and B2 knockout mice infected by Plasmodium chabaudi. Each group (knockout and wild type) consisted of C57BL6 (n = 8) infected i.p. with 103 iRBC. a Survival curve of B1 receptor knockout mice vs wild type infected mice (p < 0.05). b Survival curve of B2 receptor knockout mice vs wild type infected mice (p > 0.05; ns). The statistical significance of difference between control and experimental groups was determined with the Log-Rank test for the cumulative survival experiments
Fig. 3B2 kinin receptor expression in liver of uninfected and infected mice by Plasmodium chabaudi. a Cellular location of B2 kinin receptor in liver of uninfected group (CLT) and infected-treated with 0.9% NaCl (INF), captopril (CP), chloroquine (CQ) or chloroquine and captopril association (CQCP). Negative control (CNeg) was performed in liver of control mice. The white arrows indicate B2R staining in vessel walls (green). b, c Expression of B2R determined in liver homogenate by western blotting and respective densitometric quantification of immunoreactive bands for B2R immunoblottings (c). All values were normalized by GAPDH bands (36 kDa, internal control). n = 5 for B2R mean ± SEM
Fig. 4B1 kinin receptor expression in liver of mice infected with Plasmodium chabaudi. a Immunofluorescence of B1 receptor (green) in liver tissue. The white arrows indicate the B1R immunostaining in blood vessels, and the arrowheads (black or white) show the sinusoidal spaces. Semi-quantitative analysis of B1R density in vessels (b) and sinusoids (c). DNA fluorescence (DAPI/blue) and phase contrast (PC). n = 3/4 mice per group. Kruskal–Wallis with multiple comparison post-test of Dunn’s; ***p < 0.0001. d, e Densitometric quantification of bands for B1R. The values represent mean ± SEM (n = 4); One-way ANOVA test with post-test of Bonferroni’s *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.001 compared with CTL
Fig. 5Schematic model of kinin receptors distribution in the liver cells during murine malaria infection. Immunolocalization B1 and B2 receptors in mouse liver uninfected and infected with P. chabaudi from the results obtained at peak infection