| Literature DB >> 31234819 |
Tim N Beck1,2, Alexander Y Deneka3,4, Louis Chai5, Colin Kanach6, Priya Johal6, Nicolas J Alvarez7, Yanis Boumber4,8, Erica A Golemis3, Glenn W Laub9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a devastating sequela associated with cancer. Talc pleurodesis is a common treatment strategy for MPE but has been estimated to be unsuccessful in up to 20-50% of patients. Clinical failure of talc pleurodesis is thought to be due to poor dispersion. This monograph reports the development of a foam delivery system designed to more effectively coat the pleural cavity.Entities:
Keywords: Lung cancer; Malignant pleural effusion; Metastatic cancer; Mouse model; Pleurodesis; Sclerosing agent; Talc; Thermosensitive hydrogel
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31234819 PMCID: PMC6589887 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5777-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Triblock copolymer hydrogel for delivery of talc. a. Molecular structure of the polymer matrix. PEO = polyethylene oxide; PPO = polypropylene oxide. b. Rheological studies of a triblock copolymer demonstrating reverse temperature dependent viscosity. As the temperature increases, the viscosity increases several orders of magnitude. Complex modulus in Pascals (Pa)
Fig. 2Histology of pleura and lung parenchyma of mice that received intrapleural injection of saline (S), foam (F), talc foam (TF) or talc slurry (TS). a. Representative images of hematoxylin-eosin and trichrome stained tissue samples. Trichrome stains fibrotic tissue component and appears in blue color. Large image: magnification 4x, scale bar, 300 μm; inset: 20x, scale bar: 30 μm. b. Quantification of fibrotic lung and pleural tissue for each treatment group. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01. Number of animals per group = 3 for F and NS, 8 for TS and 11 for TF
Fig. 3Evaluation of loss of air volume after treatment with control treatment, talc foam (TF) or talc slurry (TS). a. Study design. b. Representative CT images for the three treatment groups (control – C – foam and saline; talc slurry – TS; talc foam – TF) at two different time points. Detected air volume (AV) is shown in red. c. Average loss of air volume based on CT scanning at day 14, compared to day 1 (considered 100%) for each mouse. *, p < 0.05. Number of animals per group = 6 for C, 6 for TS and 8 for TF
Fig. 4Talc foam reduces MPE without adversely impacting survival. a. Kaplan-Meier survival curve of mice treated with control (foam or saline), TF, or TS. Number of animals per group = 8 for control, 15 for TF and 14 for TS. b. Effusion volume (μL) for each treatment group. Not significant (ns), p > 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001