| Literature DB >> 31234598 |
Abstract
In order to improve the indoor air quality, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be removed via an efficient approach by using catalysts. This review proposed a comprehensive summary of various nanomaterials for thermal/photo-catalytic removal of VOCs. These representative materials are mainly categorized as carbon-based and metallic oxides materials, and their morphologies, synthesis techniques, and performances have been explained in detail. To improve the indoor and outdoor air quality, the catalytic nanomaterials can be utilized for emerging building applications such as VOC-reduction coatings, paints, air filters, and construction materials. Due to the characteristics of low cost, non-toxic and high chemical stability, metallic oxides such as TiO2 and ZnO have been widely investigated for decades and dominate the application market of VOC-removal catalyst in buildings. Since other catalysts also showed brilliant performance and have been theoretically researched, they can be potential candidates for applications in future healthy buildings. This review will contribute to further knowledge and greater potential applications of promising VOC-reducing catalytic nanomaterials on healthier buildings for a better indoor and outdoor environment well-being.Entities:
Keywords: VOCs removal; catalytic oxidation; green application; healthy buildings; nanomaterials; photocatalysis; photocatalytic reactor; thermal oxidation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31234598 PMCID: PMC6631840 DOI: 10.3390/nano9060910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Mechanisms of photocatalytic oxidation for the removal of VOCs [14]. (reproduced from [14], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 2Outline of this review paper.
Commonly used materials for catalytic removal of VOCs.
| No. | Catalytic | Category | VOC | Nanomaterial | Morphology | Medium | Doping Concentration | Synthesis | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Photo- | TiO2 | Trichloro-ethylene | nanostructured TiO2 particles | Primary particle size: 2.3–30 nm, secondary particle size: 100–900 nm | titanium isopropoxide | water concentrations: 2.3, 0.3, 0.27, and 0.18 M | low-temperature synthesis, modified sol–gel method | [ |
| 2 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene | Titanium isopropoxide | Primary particle size:11 nm | isopropanol–water solution | 2.5 mL H2O, 25 mL ethanol, 150-mL (hydrothermal) | sol–gel synthesis, thermal & hydrothermal methods | [ |
| 3 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene | TiO2 thin films | particle sizes less than 100 nm, monocrystalline nanodiamond | Titanium (IV) tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) (Ti(OCH(CH3)2)4) and water | detonation method (purchased from microdiamant) | [ | |
| 4 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene, acetaldehyde | TiO2 nanotubes (TNT) & nanopartcles (TNP) film; commercial TiO2 (P25) | average surface area of 50 m2 g−1, primary particle size: 20–30 nm, channel pores diameter: 40–60 nm, tube length: 9.5 (±0.9) μm. | [TNP] Ethanol | [TNP] 0.15 g/mL | [TNP] doctor-blade method | [ |
| 5 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene | Ti-foil (99.7%,0.25 mm, Aldrich, USA) | top and bottom opened structure of which thediameters are 100 nm and 50 nm, respectively NP@DNT films of 15 (±2) μm | ethylene glycol solution containing 0.25 wt% NH4F and 0.3 vol% distilled water | potentiostatic anodization method | [ | |
| 6 | Photo- | TiO2 | Hexane, methanol | anatase and rutile TiO2 (0.1 mol) | Surface area between 39 to 84 m2/g (given in table) | 1.5 mol anhydrous Ethanol, water–ethanol solution containing 1 mol ethanol with a ratio of water:butoxide = 50:1. | aqueous HNO3 solution of various concentration (0.1–1.0 mol/L) with the ratio of solid (g): liquid (mL) = 1:10 | hydrothermal method | [ |
| 7 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene | Anatase/brookite/rutile tricrystalline TiO2 | amorphous TiO2 suspension | HNO3 solution (65%) | The molar ratios of HNO3 to TBOT (RHNO3) were varied from 0.2 to 1.2 at intervals of 0.2 by varying the volume of HNO3 solution. | low-temperature hydrothermal method | [ |
| 8 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene | co-alloying TiO2 | fine bright yellow powder, primary particles diameter: 1–2 μm | TiCl4 reacted with NbCl5 and urea in an ethanol solution | toluene concentrations: 1~5 ppm; relative humidity: 25~65%; air velocity: 0.78~7.84 cm/s; irradiancy: 42~95 W/m2. | urea-glass synthesis | [ |
| 9 | Photo- | TiO2 | Isopropyl alcohol | Hybrid CuxO/TiO2 Nanocomposites | Commercial TiO2 (rutile phase, 15 nm grain size, 90 m2/g specific surface area) | CuCl2 solution, NaOH and glucose solutions (reduce & control the CuI/CuII ratio | 10 mL of CuCl2 solution. | simple impregnation method | [ |
| 10 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene | commercial TiO2 (P25) | Platinum nanoparticles in the size of 1–3 nm were clearly deposited on the surface of TiO2 | 0.5 wt% Pt and 30 mM fluoride for VOC | sodium fluoride (10, 30, and 50 mM) and Pt (0.1, 0.5, and 1 wt%) | photo deposition method | [ |
| 11 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene | hybrid nanomaterial Pt-rGO-TiO2 | TiO2 nanopowder: commercial P25 (Degussa). | ethanol-water | 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2 wt% Pt-rGO-TiO2 nanocomposite catalysts | solvothermal method | [ |
| 12 | Photo- | TiO2 | Toluene | Composites ACFF | Diameter: 12 μm, pore size: 32 μm. | Polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon)-lined stainless-steel autoclaves | 1.0, 2.0, 3.5 and 5.0 l of toluene were injected into the above reactor | Purchased ACFF, | [ |
| 13 | Photo- | TiO2 | Formaldehyde, trichloro-ethylene | TiO2 nanoparticles | BET area:392 m2 g−1, micro mean pore size: 0.6 nm | 8 wt% DAPs | incipient wetness impregnation, freeze-drying, or mechanical mixing | [ | |
| 14 | Photo- | Zinc oxide | Toluene | ZnAl2O4 nanoparticles | commercial P25 powder (reference) | [solvothermal synthetic] Al(NO3)3·9H2O (2 mmol), Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (1 mmol), ethylene glycol (30 mL) | solvothermal, citrate precursor, hydrothermal methods | [ | |
| 15 | Photo- | Ni oxide | Toluene | Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (NCNTs) supported NiO(NiO/NCNTs) | NCNTs: tubular structure, 20 nm-diameter; NiO: crystallite, 3–10 nm | catalyst and pyridine and/or 3-(aminomethyl)pyridine | volume ratio of pyridine to 3-(aminomethyl)pyridine: 5, 3, 1 and 0 | Chemical vapor deposition method | [ |
| 16 | Photo- | WO3 | H2O2 | Nano-diamonds combined with WO3 | ND: ca. 4–6 nm diameter | WO3 (Aldrich) | 0.5–16 wt% ND contents | Simple dehydration condensation | [ |
| 17 | Photo- | Manganese Oxide | Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes | Manganese Oxide and Copper | KMnO4 solution (OMS-2); | Mn(CH3COO)2 solution (OMS-2); | a simple refluxing method | [ | |
| 18 | Photo- | Manganese Oxide | Formaldehyde indoors | manganese oxide | Shown in SEM images | ethanol solution of manganese acetate | Mn(CH3COO)2·4H2O:PAN-ACNF 0.5–20 wt.% | [ | |
| 19 | Photo- | Bi-based compounds | Acetone, toluene | Bi2WO6 | CQDs: high dispersion, uniform size of 3–5 nm in diameter | carbon quantum dots (CQDs) | adding 1.0–6.0 g of CQDs | Hydrothermal synthesis | [ |
| 20 | Photo- | AgBr | methyl orange | AgBr | monoclinic WO3 substrate, face-centered cubic AgBr nanoparticles: crystalline sizes less than 56.8 nm. | WO3 | AgBr contents were respectively obtained and defined as TA-0.05, TB-0.10, TC-0.15, TD-0.20, TE-0.25, TF-0.30 and TG-0.40. | deposition–precipitation method | [ |
| 21 | Thermal | Platinum | Toluene | Pt/Al2O3–CeO2 nanocatalysts | average size: 5–20 nm. | CeO2(10%)/Al2O3, 2.8 g Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, 100 mL distilled water | ceria loading of 10, 20 and 30% | wet impregnation method | [ |
| 22 | Thermal | Platinum | benzene | Pt/Al2O3 | Pt particle sizes between 1.2–2.2 nm | H2PtCl6·6H2O | Pt/A l2O3−x, x: pH value of 7.0, 9.0 and 11.0 | modified ethylene glycol (EG) reduction approach | [ |
| 23 | Thermal | Platinum | Formaldehyde (HCHO) | Pt/TiO2/Al2O3 | BET area from 16.5 to 182.5 m2/g | (NH4)[TiO(C2O4)2] | The platinum loading: 0.62, 1.26,1.19 and 1.25 gm−2 | Electro-deposition technology | [ |
| 24 | Thermal | Silica-iridium | Toluene | chloride-ion free iridium acetylacetonate, Ir(AcAc)3 | ∼5 to 27 nm | SiO2 Degussa Aerosil 200 | Size of iridium particles: ~5 to 27 nm (calcination temperature 350~750 °C) | incipient wetness impregnation | [ |
| 25 | Thermal | Carbon | benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and oxylene | Pt/carbon nanotube (CNT) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) | CNTs: 20–50 nm column diameters MWCNTs: 20–50 nm diameters | acid treatment using HF, H2SO4, and HNO3 | Pt content in the catalysts ranging from 10 to 30 wt%. | a molecular-level mixing method | [ |
| 26 | Photo- | Carbon based | Volatile Aromatic Pollutant | TiO2_graphene | Shown in SEM image | An ethanol-water solvent | P25_GR with weight addition ratios of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 30% GR. | facile hydrothermal reaction | [ |
| 27 | Photo- | Carbon-based | methanol | graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, and few-layer graphene | BET area (m2/g): | Polyacrylonitrile | a polymer concentration of 5% ( | hydrothermal method (reduced graphene oxide); others purchased | [ |
Figure 3TEM images of fresh (a) TNP and (b) TNT; repeated photocatalytic degradation cycles of gaseous toluene on (c) TNP and (d) TNT in the air (●: [Toluene], ○: [CO2]) [36]. (adapted from [36], with permission from American Chemical Society, 2019).
Figure 4Comparison results between TiO2 and P25 for (a) photodegradation rate of gaseous toluene and (b) recycling test over tricrystalline TiO2-0.8 (blank) and P25 (filled) for five repeat uses [39]. (adapted from [39], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 5(a) TEM images of the 0.25% CuxO/TiO2 sample. CuxO clusters (marked by red arrows) were highly dispersed on the TiO2 surfaces; (b) comparative studies of CO2 generation over bare TiO2, TiO2−xNx, and 0.25% CuxO/TiO2 samples under the same conditions [41]. (adapted from [41], with permission from American Chemical Society, 2019).
Figure 6(a) HR-TEM image and (b) repeated photocatalytic degradation cycles of gaseous toluene on F-TiO2/Pt [42]. (adapted from [42], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 7(a) High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy images and HRTEM of 1% Pt-rGO-TiO2; (b) time course of toluene conversion over TiO2, 1% Pt-TiO2 and x% Pt-rGO-TiO2 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2) under IR irradiation with various light intensities (95, 106 and 116 mW/cm2) [43]. (adapted from [43], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 8(a) SEM images and (b) Photocatalytic oxidation efficiencies of toluene as function of photocatalytic time under UV irradiation with TiO2/ACFF porous composites [6]. (adapted from [6], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 9SEM images for ZnAl2O4 nanoparticles synthesized with (a) hydrothermal, (b) citrate precursors, (c,d) solvothermal synthetic methods. (e) The degradation percentage of toluene among 1 (ZnAl2O4 nanoparticles + citrate precursors), 2 (P25 TiO2), 3 (ZnAl2O4 nanoparticles + hydrothermal), 4 (TiO2 nanoballs), and 5 (ZnAl2O4 nanoparticles + solvothermal synthetic) samples under UV illumination [45]. (adapted from [45], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 10TEM images of NiO/NCNT catalysts with the pyridine to 3-(aminomethyl) pyridine volume ratios of (a) 5, (b) 3, (c) 1 and (d) 0; and (e) their toluene conversion vs. reaction temperatures against those of NiO/CNTs [46]. (adapted from [46], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 11(a) Reaction mechanism for total oxidation of VOCs over nanostructured Pt/Al2O3–CeO2 catalysts. (b) Comparison of catalytic performance of synthesized Pt (1 wt%)/Al2O3–CeO2 (30 wt%) nanocatalyst for total oxidation of benzene, toluene and xylene [52]. (adapted from [52], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 12(a) Field emission scanning electron microscopy image and (b) catalytic oxidation of BTEX mixture as a function of reactor temperature over 30 wt% Pt/CNT catalyst [56]. (adapted from [56], with permission from Elsevier, 2019).
Applications of photocatalytic materials for VOC removal on buildings.
| No. | Catalytic | Applications | Materials | Comparison & Experiments | Pollutants | Performance | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thermal | Indoor air purification | Pt/ZnO/SiC | Toluene concentration: 100~500 ppm | Toluene | Toluene was used as a model volatile organic compound and reached complete conversion of up to 100% over the porous tubular Pt/ZnO/SiC material at a filtration velocity of 0.72 m/min within 240 h at 210 °C maintained within 24 h | [ |
| 2 | Photo- | Indoor air purification | Glass fiber tissue supported TiO2 | Inlet pollutant concentrations (25–300 mg m−3), flow rates (2–8 m3 h−1), relative humidity of effluent (5, 30, 50 and 90%), input of the plasma discharge (9–21 kV) | Trichloromethane (CHCl3) | Combination of plasma DBD and photocatalysis enhances the removal efficiency | [ |
| 3 | Photo- | Indoor air purification | Ln3+–TiO2 | La3+–TiO2 and Nd3+–TiO2 | benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o-xylene (BTEX) | Highest adsorption ability: 0.7% Ln3+–TiO2 catalysts. | [ |
| 4 | Photo- | Coating | TiO2 thin films | Commercial glasses: Pilkington Activ™ Blue PAB) and Pilkington Activ™ Clear (PAC). | 2-propanol | For the 2-propanol oxidation, PAC was found to be more active under UV light due to the larger surface area and higher TiO2 particle concentration. | [ |
| 5 | Photo- | Coating | TiO2 coated on fiberglass fibers | TiO2 coated on carbon cloth fibres, a pilot duct system for experiment | polytetrafluoroethylene | The single-pass removal efficiency ranks: alcohols > ketones > aromatics > alkanes. | [ |
| 6 | Photo- | Coating | TiO2 | single-layer coating & multilayer TiO2 coating | rhodamine B | Degrading self-cleaning ability of analysed coatings caused by ageing processes, and no significant difference between single-layer and multilayer coatings in the long-term | [ |
| 7 | Photo- | Paint | Three self-cleaning photocatalytic paints | Three white commercial photocatalytic paints; expose to UVC lamp, Xenon lamp, LED and fluorescent lamps for 10 h | methyl red, methylene blue | Limited photocatalytic action under visible light | [ |
| 8 | Photo- | Paint | commercial AEROXIDE_TiO2 P25 powder | Matrix with nitric acid and H2SO4 | rhodamine b | Nitric acid causes a decrease in crystallinity and photocatalytic activity, which drops by almost 20%; H2SO4 the best candidate for TiO2 nanoparticles acid treatment | [ |
| 9 | Photo- | Paint | TiO2 microspheres | commercial TiO2 particles P25 | methylene blue solution | MTiO2: more stable and better photoactivity | [ |
| 10 | Photo- | Paint | TiO2 | 5% P25-TiO2-intermixed and dip-coated SCAM samples | rhodamine b | TiO2/SCAM: high self-cleaning ability and a robust weathering resistance under UV-A and visible light irradiations. | [ |
| 11 | Photo- | Paint | TiO2 coating (PC-S7, Cristal Active) | TiO2 (P25) intermixed nanopowder. | Rhodamine b | TiO2 coating on mortar shows better photocatalytic performances than TiO2 intermixed samples on air purifying and self-cleaning properties under both UV-A and visible light (VL) irradiation conditions. | [ |
| 12 | Photo- | Paint | TiO2 P25 | ZnO | dye Acid Orange 7 | Photocatalytic activity of TiO2 increases with weathering time. ZnO: significantly higher photocatalytic activity for initial photoactivity of the unweathered paints but decreased after weathering. | [ |
| 13 | Photo- | Mortar | Mortars containing TiO2 and iron oxide pigments | Atmospheric exposure tests and photocatalytic degradation tests were performed. | 2-propanol | Iron oxide pigments caused lower photocatalytic activity compared to white mortars. | [ |