| Literature DB >> 31234227 |
Qingfeng Liu1, Ziyun Zhou2, Pingsheng Liu1,2,3, Shuyan Zhang2.
Abstract
Laboratory mice are standardly housed at around 23 °C, setting them under chronic cold stress. Metabolic changes in the liver in mice housed at thermoneutral, standard and cold temperatures remain unknown. In the present study, we isolated lipid droplets and mitochondria from their livers in a comparative proteomic study aiming to investigate the changes. According to proteomic analysis, mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) and retinol metabolism are enhanced, whereas oxidative phosphorylation is not affected obviously under cold conditions, suggesting that liver mitochondria may increase TCA cycle capacity in biosynthetic pathways, as well as retinol metabolism, to help the liver to adapt. Based on proteomic and immunoblotting results, perilipin 5 and major urinary proteins are increased significantly, whereas mitochondrial pyruvate carrier is decreased dramatically under cold conditions, indicating their involvement in liver adaptation.Entities:
Keywords: chronic cold stress; lipid droplet; liver adaptation; mitochondrion; organellar proteomics; thermoneutral temperature
Year: 2019 PMID: 31234227 PMCID: PMC6771624 DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.13509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Lett ISSN: 0014-5793 Impact factor: 4.124
Figure 1The changes of male mouse livers when mice were housed at T N, standard temperature and cold temperatures for 4 weeks. The male mice aged 10 weeks were housed in individual cages at 30, 23 or 6 °C for 4 weeks and fed a chow diet. (A) Histological and ultrastructural analysis of mouse livers after housing for 4 weeks. (Aa–Ac) Liver morphology. (Ad–Af) Liver histology by H&E staining of liver sections. (Ag–Al) Liver ultrastructure analyzed by TEM. (B) Effects of housing temperature on liver mass and body weight after housing for 4 weeks. (Ba) Initial body weight. (Bb) Final body weight. (Bc) Liver mass. (Bd) Ratio of liver mass to body weight. (C) TAG content in liver after housing for 4 weeks. (D) Glycogen content in liver after housing for 4 weeks. In (B) to (D), n = 6 per group. In the bar graphs, the data represent the mean ± SEM, analyzed by one‐way ANOVA. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 2Verification of purified LDs and mitochondria. LDs and mitochondria were isolated from the livers of mice after being housed at different temperatures for 4 weeks. (A) Flowchart for isolation. Briefly, LDs were isolated using sucrose density centrifugation and the resulting top layer was collected. Mitochondria were isolated using Percoll density gradient centrifugation and the resulting layer from the 50% to 25% Percoll interface was recovered. (Ba) Confocal microscopy analysis of isolated LDs by LipidTOX Red staining, DIC imaging and merged images. (Bb) Confocal microscopy analysis of isolated mitochondria by MitoTracker Red staining, DIC imaging and merged images. (Bc) Analysis of lipids extracted from isolated LDs by TLC. Scale Bar = 5 μm. (C) Silver staining and western blotting analysis of fractions from livers in mice housed at (Ca) 30 °C (Cb) 23 °C and (Cc) 6 °C. The proteins from isolated LD, MT, cytosol (Cyto), TM and PNS fractions were separated by SDS/PAGE and silver stained (upper). With equal protein loading, the indicated antibodies were tested to probe for marker proteins of different organelles/cellular fractions (lower): ADRP, ACSL5 and Rab18 (LD proteins); VDAC, Tim23 and ATP5a (MT proteins); GAPDH (cytosol protein); and BIP (ER protein).
Figure 3TMT‐based comparative proteomic analysis of liver LDs and mitochondria from mouse living at different temperatures. The LD and mitochondrial proteins were labelled with TMT for comparative proteomic study, respectively. (A) Flow chart of the experimental procedures. Briefly, the LD or mitochondrial proteins from six groups (two groups in each temperature) were digested. After labelling with TMT 6plex reagent and separation, thermo proteome discoverer 2.2.0.388 was used to search the raw data for protein identification and quantitation. (B) Overview of the identified proteins. (Ba) The identified LD proteins were analyzed and categorized by subcellular locations and functions according to the UniProtKB database. (Bb) The identified proteins in the mitochondrial preparations were subjected to enrichment analysis. The DAVID Bioinformatics tool was used and the enrichment factors were calculated for cellular organelles. (Bc) The identified mitochondrial proteins were categorized according to the KEGG pathway system. (C) Pathway enrichment analysis of the differential proteins in liver mitochondria under different conditions. The differential proteins were subjected to a KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. The ratio of the enriched differential proteins in a specific pathway to the total differential proteins was shown. The protein amount and the P value are also shown. P represents the significance of each pathway enriched by the mitochondrial proteins. P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant with respect to consideration.
Significantly changed proteins revealed by comparative proteomic analysis of liver mitochondria from mice at different temperatures.
| Groups | Pattern | Number of proteins | UniProtKB Accession Number | Protein description | Gene name | Ratio |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Up‐regulated | 18 | Q14DH7 | Acyl‐CoA synthetase short‐chain family member 3 | Acss3 | 1.46 | 0.06 |
| Q91X75 | Cyp2a4 protein | Cyp2a5 | 1.38 | 0.10 | |||
| O70400 | PDZ and LIM domain protein 1 | Pdlim1 | 1.36 | 0.07 | |||
| Q8K0L3 | Acyl‐coenzyme A synthetase ACSM2 | Acsm2 | 1.35 | 0.04 | |||
| Q505D7 | Optic atrophy 3 protein homolog | Opa3 | 1.33 | 0.02 | |||
| P29758 | Ornithine aminotransferase | Oat | 1.32 | 0.01 | |||
| Q9WVM8 | Kynurenine/alpha‐aminoadipate aminotransferase | Aadat | 1.29 | 0.03 | |||
| Q9QZA0 | Carbonic anhydrase 5B | Ca5b | 1.25 | 0.07 | |||
| Q504M2 | MCG53395 | Pdp2 | 1.25 | 0.09 | |||
| D3YYS6 | Monoglyceride lipase | Mgll | 1.25 | 0.07 | |||
| Down‐regulated | 59 | Q8VCF0 | Mitochondrial antiviral‐signalling protein | Mavs | 0.34 | 0.09 | |
| Q8BSE0 | Regulator of microtubule dynamics protein 2 | Rmdn2 | 0.39 | 0.06 | |||
| Q9CZW5 | Mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM70 | Tomm70 | 0.52 | 0.06 | |||
| Q8BH80 | Vesicle‐associated membrane protein, associated protein B and C | Vapb | 0.52 | 0.10 | |||
| Q9WV55 | Vesicle‐associated membrane protein‐associated protein A | Vapa | 0.52 | 0.07 | |||
| Q3UJU9 | Regulator of microtubule dynamics protein 3 | Rmdn3 | 0.52 | 0.06 | |||
| F6U775 | Dynamin‐like 120 kDa protein | Opa1 | 0.56 | 0.06 | |||
| P13516 | Acyl‐CoA desaturase 1 | Scd1 | 0.57 | 0.03 | |||
| O70303 | Cell death activator CIDE‐B | Cideb | 0.62 | 0.03 | |||
| Q8VDJ3 | Vigilin | Hdlbp | 0.63 | 0.02 | |||
|
| Up‐regulated | 175 | P70670 | Nascent polypeptide‐associated complex subunit alpha | Naca | 2.44 | 0.04 |
| Q9CXV1 | Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] cytochrome | Sdhd | 2.23 | 0.02 | |||
| D3YVW2 | Golgi integral membrane protein 4 | Golim4 | 2.16 | 0.01 | |||
| P22599 | Alpha‐1‐antitrypsin 1–2 | Serpina1b | 2.13 | 0.05 | |||
| Q8BWY3 | Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1 | Etf1 | 1.97 | 0.10 | |||
| Q91X75 | Cyp2a4 protein | Cyp2a5 | 1.95 | 0.003 | |||
| Q9ET30 | Transmembrane 9 superfamily member 3 | Tm9sf3 | 1.94 | 0.06 | |||
| Q3TGU7 | Proliferation‐associated 2G4 | Pa2 g4 | 1.93 | 0.01 | |||
| Q9JMG1 | Endothelial differentiation‐related factor 1 | Edf1 | 1.91 | 0.04 | |||
| Q9CZR8 | Elongation factor Ts | Tsfm | 1.79 | 0.01 | |||
| Down‐regulated | 72 | Q05816 | Fatty acid‐binding protein, epidermal | Fabp5 | 0.36 | 0.004 | |
| P63030 | MPC 1 | Mpc1 | 0.44 | 0.006 | |||
| Q9D0B5 | Thiosulfate sulfurtransferase/rhodanese‐like domain‐containing protein 3 | Tstd3 | 0.46 | 0.03 | |||
| Q8VCF0 | Mitochondrial antiviral‐signalling protein | Mavs | 0.51 | 0.07 | |||
| P62806 | Histone H4 | Hist1h4a | 0.52 | 0.06 | |||
| A0A1W2P768 | Histone H3.2 | Hist2h3c1 | 0.55 | 0.10 | |||
| P62996 | Transformer‐2 protein homolog beta | Tra2b | 0.55 | 0.07 | |||
| A0A0N4SVP8 | Predicted pseudogene 5580 | Gm5580 | 0.56 | 0.01 | |||
| Q9D3D9 | ATP synthase subunit delta | Atp5d | 0.58 | 0.01 | |||
| Q62425 | Cytochrome | Ndufa4 | 0.58 | 0.01 | |||
|
| Up‐regulated | 34 | Q9CXV1 | Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] cytochrome | Sdhd | 1.83 | 0.08 |
| Q9ESP1 | Stromal cell‐derived factor 2‐like protein 1 | Sdf2 l1 | 1.61 | 0.09 | |||
| Q9CR21 | Acyl carrier protein | Ndufab1 | 1.61 | 0.09 | |||
| P00186 | Cytochrome P450 1A2 | Cyp1a2 | 1.42 | 0.08 | |||
| Q99L04 | Dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 1 | Dhrs1 | 1.41 | 0.01 | |||
| Q91X77 | Cytochrome P450 2C50 | Cyp2c50 | 1.40 | 0.09 | |||
| Q5HZI9 | Solute carrier family 25 member 51 | Slc25a51 | 1.39 | 0.06 | |||
| G3X9F4 | Transmembrane protein 143 | Tmem143 | 1.39 | 0.06 | |||
| P61027 | Ras‐related protein Rab‐10 | Rab10 | 1.38 | 0.06 | |||
| Q9DC16 | ER‐Golgi intermediate compartment protein 1 | Ergic1 | 1.38 | 0.08 | |||
| Down‐regulated | 19 | P62806 | Histone H4 | Hist1h4a | 0.40 | 0.05 | |
| P10922 | Histone H1.0 | H1f0 | 0.41 | 0.07 | |||
| A0A1W2P768 | Histone H3.2 | Hist2h3c1 | 0.42 | 0.09 | |||
| P63030 | MPC 1 | Mpc1 | 0.56 | 0.00 | |||
| Q64433 | 10 kDa heat shock protein | Hspe1 | 0.63 | 0.06 | |||
| P09671 | Superoxide dismutase [Mn] | Sod2 | 0.65 | 0.07 | |||
| A0A0N4SVP8 | Predicted pseudogene 5580 | Gm5580 | 0.68 | 0.04 | |||
| F8VPU2 | FERM, ARHGEF and pleckstrin domain‐containing protein 1 | Farp1 | 0.69 | 0.07 | |||
| P61458 | Pterin‐4‐alpha‐carbinolamine dehydratase | Pcbd1 | 0.70 | 0.05 | |||
| P10852 | 4F2 cell‐surface antigen heavy chain | Slc3a2 | 0.70 | 0.03 |
Significantly changed proteins revealed by comparative proteomic analysis of liver LDs from mice at different temperatures.
| Groups | Pattern | Number of proteins | UniProtKB Accession Number | Protein description | Gene name | Ratio |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Up‐regulated | 21 | B5X0G2 | MUP 17 | Mup17 | 1.72 | 0.06 |
| P35980 | 60S ribosomal protein L18 | Rpl18 | 1.53 | 0.01 | |||
| Q6ZWN5 | 40S ribosomal protein S9 | Rps9 | 1.53 | 0.08 | |||
| Q8BVZ1 | Perilipin‐5 | Plin5 | 1.46 | 0.06 | |||
| Q9DCM2 | Glutathione | Gstk1 | 1.43 | 0.01 | |||
| Q99LB2 | Dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 4 | Dhrs4 | 1.38 | 0.06 | |||
| Q99P30 | Peroxisomal coenzyme A diphosphatase NUDT7 | Nudt7 | 1.38 | 0.07 | |||
| P14131 | 40S ribosomal protein S16 | Rps16 | 1.36 | 0.04 | |||
| Q01853 | Transitional ER ATPase | Vcp | 1.36 | 0.03 | |||
| E9QKR0 | Guanine nucleotide‐binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(T) subunit beta‐2 | Gnb2 | 1.34 | 0.04 | |||
|
| Up‐regulated | 29 | B5X0G2 | MUP 17 | Mup17 | 2.32 | 0.02 |
| P25688 | Uricase | Uox | 1.81 | 0.01 | |||
| P32020 | Non‐specific lipid‐transfer protein | Scp2 | 1.76 | 0.01 | |||
| P24270 | Catalase | Cat | 1.70 | 0.01 | |||
| Q4FZE8 | MUP 1 | Mup1 | 1.65 | 0.04 | |||
| Q9DCM2 | Glutathione | Gstk1 | 1.57 | 0.03 | |||
| Q99MZ7 | Peroxisomal trans‐2‐enoyl‐CoA reductase | Pecr | 1.56 | 0.02 | |||
| Q9WU19 | Hydroxyacid oxidase 1 | Hao1 | 1.53 | 0.04 | |||
| Q9JKR6 | Hypoxia up‐regulated protein 1 | Hyou1 | 1.46 | 0.04 | |||
| Q91WG0 | Acylcarnitine hydrolase | Ces2c | 1.44 | 0.04 | |||
| Down‐regulated | 10 | P12710 | Fatty acid‐binding protein | Fabp1 | 0.74 | 0.09 | |
| F7A8H6 | Glutathione peroxidase | Gpx4 | 0.74 | 0.01 | |||
| P46638 | Ras‐related protein Rab‐11B | Rab11b | 0.77 | 0.02 | |||
| P43883 | Perilipin‐2 | Plin2 | 0.78 | 0.06 | |||
| Q8VCR2 | 17‐beta‐hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 13 | Hsd17b13 | 0.79 | 0.01 | |||
| P35279 | Ras‐related protein Rab‐6A | Rab6a | 0.80 | 0.01 | |||
| Q99JI6 | Ras‐related protein Rap‐1b | Rap1b | 0.80 | 0.03 | |||
| P62821 | Ras‐related protein Rab‐1A | Rab1A | 0.81 | 0.10 | |||
| Q9D1G1 | Ras‐related protein Rab‐1B | Rab1b | 0.82 | 0.05 | |||
| Q3TLP8 | RAS‐related C3 botulinum substrate 1 | Rac1 | 0.82 | 0.01 | |||
|
| Up‐regulated | 2 | A0A0R4J110 | Iodothyronine deiodinase | Dio1 | 1.39 | 0.03 |
| P24456 | Cytochrome P450 2D10 | Cyp2d10 | 1.22 | 0.07 | |||
| Down‐regulated | 7 | A2AE89 | Glutathione | Gstm1 | 0.58 | 0.07 | |
| A0A1D5RMD4 | Kinesin‐like protein KIF16B | Kif16b | 0.72 | 0.08 | |||
| P46638 | Ras‐related protein Rab‐11B | Rab11b | 0.78 | 0.03 | |||
| Q3TLP8 | RAS‐related C3 botulinum substrate 1 | Rac1 | 0.78 | 0.003 | |||
| P56480 | ATP synthase subunit beta | Atp5b | 0.80 | 0.07 | |||
| P43883 | Perilipin‐2 | Plin2 | 0.80 | 0.08 | |||
| P84096 | Rho‐related GTP‐binding protein RhoG | Rhog | 0.81 | 0.05 |
Figure 4Metabolic pathways over‐represented or under‐represented in the liver mitochondria from mice living at different temperatures. The identified proteins that were up‐ or down‐regulated in the liver mitochondria under different conditions were analyzed using the KEGG database for over‐ or under‐represented pathways involved in metabolism. The bars represent −log10(P; the enrichment factors). Significantly affected pathways should have −log10 (P) value score > 1.3 (P < 0.05). Red bars or blue bars represent the pathway −log10 (P) value score calculated using only up‐regulated proteins or down‐regulated proteins, respectively. Metabolic pathways with at least three differential proteins identified are shown. Under these criteria, over‐ or under‐represented metabolic pathways from the T 6 vs. T 23 (A), T 6 vs. T 30 (B) and T 23 vs. T 30 (C) comparations are shown.
Figure 5KEGG pathways for TCA cycle and retinol metabolism in the T 6 vs. T 30 group. In the T 6 vs. T 30 group, TCA cycle and retinol metabolism in mitochondria were enriched as over‐represented pathways. The list of proteins that were up‐regulated from proteomic analysis was further analyzed in the TCA cycle pathway (A) and retinol metabolism pathway (B) using the DAVID bioinformatics database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp). The red stars indicate the site where the differential proteins function.
Figure 6Verification of proteomic results by western blotting. The expression of several proteins on isolated LDs and mitochondria was tested by western blotting to verify the accuracy of the TMT‐based quantification. (A) Verification of the expression pattern of LD proteins from three conditions. The LD proteins PLIN2/ADRP, PLIN5/OXPAT and Rab18 were tested by western blotting (lower) with equal protein loading shown by silver staining (upper). (B) Verification of the expression pattern of mitochondrial proteins from three conditions. WTL, whole tissue lysate. The proteins MPC1, MPC2, MUP1, Prohibitin and VDAC were tested by western blotting (lower) with equal protein loading shown by silver staining (upper).