Literature DB >> 31233621

Urban bumblebees are smaller and more phenotypically diverse than their rural counterparts.

Helen Eggenberger1, David Frey1,2, Loïc Pellissier3,4, Jaboury Ghazoul2,5, Simone Fontana1, Marco Moretti1.   

Abstract

With urbanization identified as being one of the key drivers of change in global land use, and the rapid expansion of urban areas world-wide, it is relevant to evaluate how novel ecological conditions in cities shape species functional traits, which are essential for how species interact with their environments and with each other. Despite the many comparative studies on organisms living in urban and non-urban areas, our knowledge on species responses to urban environments remains limited. For one, much of the ecological research has assumed that the environment changes in a linear fashion from the city core to the city edges, whereas in reality the environments within the cities are highly heterogeneous. Furthermore, studies on species responses to these highly variable ecosystems are often based on interspecific mean trait values, which ignore the potential for high levels of intraspecific variation among individuals in key functional traits. The current study investigated intraspecific functional trait differences for four functional traits associated with body size, mobility and resource selection among rural and urban populations of two common bumblebee species, Bombus pascuorum and Bombus lapidarius, in urban centres and adjacent rural areas in Switzerland. We document shifts in functional traits towards smaller individuals and higher multidimensional trait variation in urban populations compared to rural conspecifics of both species. This shows that urban individuals for both species are on average smaller sized but populations are distinctively different from rural population by increasing their trait richness and diversifying their trait combinations. In addition, we found bimodality in tongue length within urban B. pascuorum populations. Our results suggest that urban and rural populations possibly experience differential selection pressures resulting in trait differences across and among populations. We argue that variations in the respective foraging landscapes in cities leads to smaller sized but phenotypically more diverse populations, and drive functional trait divergence.
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bimodal trait distribution; bumblebees; intraspecific functional trait variation; proboscises; trait richness; urban ecology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31233621     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  8 in total

1.  Effect of urbanization and its environmental stressors on the intraspecific variation of flight functional traits in two bumblebee species.

Authors:  Nicola Tommasi; Emiliano Pioltelli; Paolo Biella; Massimo Labra; Maurizio Casiraghi; Andrea Galimberti
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 2.  Supporting Bees in Cities: How Bees Are Influenced by Local and Landscape Features.

Authors:  Anthony C Ayers; Sandra M Rehan
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Seasonal Variations of Pollinator Assemblages among Urban and Rural Habitats: A Comparative Approach Using a Standardized Plant Community.

Authors:  Vincent Zaninotto; Adrien Perrard; Olivier Babiar; Amandine Hansart; Cécile Hignard; Isabelle Dajoz
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Functional diversity and habitat preferences of native grassland plants and ground-dwelling invertebrates in private gardens along an urbanization gradient.

Authors:  Brigitte Braschler; José D Gilgado; Hans-Peter Rusterholz; Sascha Buchholz; Valerie Zwahlen; Bruno Baur
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Who can pass the urban filter? A multi-taxon approach to disentangle pollinator trait-environmental relationships.

Authors:  Anika Kristin Gathof; Anita Judit Grossmann; Johann Herrmann; Sascha Buchholz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Anthropogenic effects on the body size of two neotropical orchid bees.

Authors:  Johannes Garlin; Panagiotis Theodorou; Elisa Kathe; José Javier G Quezada-Euán; Robert J Paxton; Antonella Soro
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-02

7.  The Biological Deserts Fallacy: Cities in Their Landscapes Contribute More than We Think to Regional Biodiversity.

Authors:  Erica N Spotswood; Erin E Beller; Robin Grossinger; J Letitia Grenier; Nicole E Heller; Myla F J Aronson
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 11.566

8.  Body Size Variation in a Social Sweat Bee, Halictus ligatus (Halictidae, Apoidea), across Urban Environments.

Authors:  Rachel A Brant; Gerardo R Camilo
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.769

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.