Literature DB >> 31233478

Strengths and Limitations of a Small Randomized Trial Comparing Manual and Vacuum Drainage in Thoracentesis.

Michal Senitko1,2, Terrence E Murphy3, Jonathan T Puchalski2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31233478      PMCID： PMC6592623          DOI： 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol        ISSN： 1948-8270


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pneumothorax following thoracentesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Craig E Gordon; David Feller-Kopman; Ethan M Balk; Gerald W Smetana
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-22

2.  Assessing the Safety of Rare Events: The Importance of Sample Size.

Authors:  Ala-Eddin S Sagar; Lara Bashoura; Faria Nasim; Horiana B Grosu
Journal:  J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol       Date:  2019-07

3.  Safety and Tolerability of Vacuum Versus Manual Drainage During Thoracentesis: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Michal Senitko; Amrik S Ray; Terrence E Murphy; Katy L B Araujo; Kyle Bramley; Erin M DeBiasi; Margaret A Pisani; Kelsey Cameron; Jonathan T Puchalski
Journal:  J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol       Date:  2019-07

4.  Thoracentesis outcomes: a 12-year experience.

Authors:  Mark J Ault; Bradley T Rosen; Jordan Scher; Joe Feinglass; Jeffrey H Barsuk
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Ultrasonography guidance reduces complications and costs associated with thoracentesis procedures.

Authors:  Pankaj A Patel; Frank R Ernst; Candace L Gunnarsson
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 0.910

6.  Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method?

Authors:  Phillip W Jones; J Phillip Moyers; Jeffrey T Rogers; R Michael Rodriguez; Y C Gary Lee; Richard W Light
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.410
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.