Literature DB >> 31233220

Multicentre randomized clinical trial of colonic J pouch or straight stapled colorectal reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

S Pucciarelli1, P Del Bianco2, U Pace3, F Bianco4, A Restivo5, I Maretto1, F Selvaggi6, L Zorcolo5, S De Franciscis4, C Asteria7, E D L Urso1, D Cuicchi8, G Pellino6, E Morpurgo9, G La Torre10, E Jovine11, C Belluco12, F La Torre13, A Amato14, A Chiappa15, A Infantino16, A Barina1, G Spolverato1, D Rega3, D Kilmartin2, G L De Salvo2, P Delrio3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonic J pouch reconstruction has been found to be associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage than straight anastomosis. However, studies on this topic are underpowered and retrospective. This randomized trial evaluated whether the incidence of anastomotic leakage was reduced after colonic J pouch reconstruction compared with straight colorectal anastomosis following anterior resection for rectal cancer.
METHODS: This multicentre RCT included patients with rectal carcinoma who underwent low anterior resection followed by colorectal anastomosis. Patients were assigned randomly to receive a colonic J pouch or straight colorectal anastomosis. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of major anastomotic leakage. The incidence of global (major plus minor) anastomotic leakage and general complications were secondary outcomes. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage were identified by regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of 457 patients enrolled, 379 were evaluable (colonic J pouch arm 190, straight colorectal arm 189). The incidence of major and global anastomotic leakage, and general complications was 14·2, 19·5 and 34·2 per cent respectively in the colonic J pouch group, and 12·2, 19·0 and 27·0 per cent in the straight colorectal anastomosis group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two arms. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, male sex (odds ratio 1·79, 95 per cent c.i. 1·02 to 3·15; P = 0·042) and high ASA fitness grade (odds ratio 2·06, 1·15 to 3·71; P = 0·015) were independently associated with the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.
CONCLUSION: Colonic J pouch reconstruction does not reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and postoperative complications compared with conventional straight colorectal anastomosis. Registration number NCT01110798 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
© 2019 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31233220     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the colonic J-pouch versus straight (end-to-end) anastomosis following low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shafquat Zaman; Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed; Adewale Adeoba Ayeni; Elizabeth Peterknecht; Sadiq Mawji; Mohamed Albendary; Rajnish Mankotia; Akinfemi Akingboye
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The impact of anastomotic leak on long-term oncological outcomes after low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer: extended follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Quoc Riccardo Bao; Gianluca Pellino; Gaya Spolverato; Angelo Restivo; Simona Deidda; Giulia Capelli; Cesare Ruffolo; Francesco Bianco; Dajana Cuicchi; Elio Jovine; Raffaele Lombardi; Claudio Belluco; Antonio Amato; Filippo La Torre; Corrado Asteria; Aldo Infantino; Tania Contardo; Paola Del Bianco; Paolo Delrio; Salvatore Pucciarelli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  V Pla-Martí; J Martín-Arévalo; D Moro-Valdezate; S García-Botello; I Mora-Oliver; R Gadea-Mateo; C Cozar-Lozano; A Espí-Macías
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Short stump and high anastomosis pull-through (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis with no protective stoma for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Paola Incollingo; Armando Falato; Silvia De Franciscis; Andrea Belli; Fabio Carbone; Gaetano Gallo; Mario Fusco; Giovanni Maria Romano
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-03-16

5.  Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Patients with Rectal Tumors Undergoing Anterior Resection within an ERAS Protocol: Results from the Swedish ERAS Database.

Authors:  Daniel Asklid; Olle Ljungqvist; Yin Xu; Ulf O Gustafsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Ultimate Functional Preservation With Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Maxime Collard; Jérémie H Lefevre
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Matrix metalloproteinase-9 in relation to patients with complications after colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pim Edomskis; Max R Goudberg; Cloë L Sparreboom; Anand G Menon; Albert M Wolthuis; Andre D'Hoore; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.