Literature DB >> 31232891

Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Steven F Shannon1, Brandon J Yuan, William W Cross, Jonathan D Barlow, Michael E Torchia, Pamela K Holte, Stephen A Sems.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare functional and clinical outcomes in patients with pertrochanteric hip fractures treated with either a short (SN) or long (LN) cephalomedullary nail.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized.
SETTING: Clinical investigation was performed at the Mayo Clinic's Level 1 Trauma Center in Rochester, MN. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty patients with intertrochanteric fractures were prospectively randomized to an SN or LN cohort. A total of 168 patients (SN, n = 80; LN, n = 88) had a mean follow-up of 13.9 months. Fifty-two patients did not meet the minimum 3-month follow-up. Demographics were comparable between the cohorts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measurement was functional outcome evaluated by Short Form (SF-36) and Harris Hip scores (HHS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included implant failure, peri-implant fracture, mortality, operative time, estimated blood loss, and reoperation.
RESULTS: SN and LN cohorts were comparable in all aspects of the SF-36. There was a clinically insignificant difference in the HHS between cohorts. Patients treated in the SN cohort experienced shorter operative times but did not differ in tip-to-apex distance or subtrochanteric fracture extension. There was no difference in implant cutout, deep surgical site infection, or peri-implant fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with SNs or LNs for pertrochanteric femur fractures experienced comparable functional outcomes as measured by SF-36 and HHS. When compared with the LN cohort, SN patients experienced no difference in peri-implant fracture or lag-screw cutout and tolerated up to 3 cm of subtrochanteric fracture line extension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31232891     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  13 in total

1.  How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different?

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Brett P Salazar; Jamie Furness; James E Feng; Malcolm R DeBaun; Sean T Campbell; Justin F Lucas; William W Cross; Philipp Leucht; Kevin D Grant; Michael J Gardner; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 2.  Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Joseph Lewis; Jamie Stokes; James R Gill; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Martyn J Parker; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell Ng; Nihar S Shah; Ivan Golub; Matthew Ciminero; Kevin Zhai; Kevin K Kang; Ahmed K Emara; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-19

4.  Short or long intramedullary devices for hip fracture? A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Piers R J Page; William E C Poole; Kanishk Shah; Piyush K Upadhyay
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-29

5.  Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Long versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails.

Authors:  Cameron Sadeghi; Heather A Prentice; Kanu M Okike; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020

6.  Fractures around Trochanteric Nails: The "Vergilius Classification System".

Authors:  Giuseppe Toro; Antimo Moretti; Daniele Ambrosio; Raffaele Pezzella; Annalisa De Cicco; Giovanni Landi; Nicola Tammaro; Pasquale Florio; Antonio Benedetto Cecere; Adriano Braile; Antonio Medici; Antonio Siano; Bruno Di Maggio; Giampiero Calabrò; Nicola Gagliardo; Ciro Di Fino; Gaetano Bruno; Achille Pellegrino; Giacomo Negri; Vincenzo Monaco; Michele Gison; Antonio Toro; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Umberto Tarantino; Giovanni Iolascon
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-01-12

7.  Short cephalomedullary nail toggle: a closer examination.

Authors:  Albert V George; Kamil Bober; Erik B Eller; William M Hakeos; Joseph Hoegler; Ali H Jawad; S Trent Guthrie
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-01-26

8.  Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel Kai Yang Tan; Christoph Sheng Chong; Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Sub-Classification of AO/OTA-2018 Pertrochanteric Fractures Is Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Fixation of Intramedullary Nails.

Authors:  Hui Song; Sun-Jun Hu; Shou-Chao Du; Wen-Feng Xiong; Shi-Min Chang
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-23

10.  A new fluoroscopic view for evaluation of anteromedial cortex reduction quality during cephalomedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures: the 30° oblique tangential projection.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Chen; Shi-Min Chang; Rujan Tuladhar; Zhen Wei; Wen-Feng Xiong; Sun-Jun Hu; Shou-Chao Du
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.