| Literature DB >> 31231351 |
Felicity V Crotty1, Sina M Adl1.
Abstract
The soil food web is often described as having three main energy channels: root, bacterial and fungal. Here we provide quantitative data using a sensitive stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry procedure with microcosms on species interactions in the fungal pathway. We measured 15N andEntities:
Keywords: fungivory; microarthropods; nutrient cycling; stable isotopes; trophic interactions
Year: 2019 PMID: 31231351 PMCID: PMC6568236 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Weight of microarthropods and mycelium consumed in daily dry-weight per individual (n = 5).
| Probability (SED) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (μg) | 18.87 ( ± 1.017)a | 1.76 ( ± 0.128)b | 1.77 ( ± 0.125)b | 3.16 ( ± 0.105)b | |
| Ingested (μg day-1) | –0.82 ( ± 6.461)a | 5.29 ( ± 1.370)b | 5.11 ( ± 1.105)b | 4.70 ( ± 1.279)b | |
| Excreted (μg day-1) | 0.00 | 1.65 ( ± 0.012)a | 0.58 ( ± 0.032)b | 0.74 ( ± 0.020)b | |
| Excreted/ingested % | 31.2% | 11.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Body weight ingested (day-1) | –0.25 ( ± 0.252)a | 3.12 ( ± 7.93)b | 3.10 ( ± 9.01)b | 1.51 ( ± 4.39)ab |
Loss (%) of individuals in each treatment.
| Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monoculture | 38 ( ± 9.8)abc | 12 ( ± 5.8)a | 46 ( ± 11.0) | 24 ( ± 2.4)ab |
| Two competitors | 28 ( ± 6.2)ab | 44 ( ± 6.8)ab | – | – |
| Three competitors | 18 ( ± 8.0)a | 18 ( ± 4.9)ab | 41 ( ± 6.8) | – |
| One fungivore and predator | 67 ( ± 7.7)d | – | – | 32 ( ± 8.0)b |
| Two competitors and predator | 68 ( ± 10.7)cd | – | 48 ( ± 14.9) | 6 ( ± 6.0)a |
| Two competitors and predator | 56 ( ± 9.3)bcd | 42 ( ± 8.6)b | – | 16 ( ± 8.7)ab |
| Three competitors and predator | 71 ( ± 5.1)cd | 48 ( ± 10.2)b | 13 ( ± 6.0) | 2 ( ± 2.0)a |
| Probability | ||||
| SED | 11.46 | 11.51 | 16.68 | 8.12 |
FIGURE 1Isotopic label of microarthropods through consumption of fungal mycelium for (A) Lepidocyrtus (Collembola), (B) Oribatula (Oribatida), (C) Tyrophagus (Astigmata), and (D) Hypoaspis (Mesostigmata) in microcosms with different combination of competitors with/out predators (n = 5). The Hypoaspis graph (D) is at a different scale from the others. The microarthropod 13C and 15N value at the beginning of each experiment is at the 0 mark of both axis, and we plot the enrichment transferred to the microarthropods in atom percent enrichment (APE). It does not represent the natural abundance value in nature, as these organisms were cultivated in the laboratory prior to the feeding experiment.