Literature DB >> 31230852

Marsupialisation for the treatment of unicystic ameloblastoma of the mandible: a long-term follow up of 116 cases.

C Y Zheng1, R Cao2, W S Hong3, M C Sheng3, Y J Hu4.   

Abstract

Unicystic ameloblastoma is a unique histopathological type of ameloblastoma, and treatment is controversial. Marsupialisation is effective in reducing the size of cystic lesions and their complications. We have retrospectively analysed the clinical, histopathological, and prognostic data of affected patients who were treated by marsupialisation between 2003 and 2013 in three Chinese hospitals. Our aim was to evaluate the effects and prognosis, and the factors associated with outcome. A total of 116 patients with mandibular unicystic ameloblastomas were included, and 74, 26, and 16 patients were histopathologically classified as being luminal, intraluminal, and mural subtypes, respectively. Most responded well to marsupialisation, with an overall recurrence rate of 12%. Resorption of the root (p<0.001), perforation of the cortical bone (p=0.005), and histopathological subtype (p=0.013) were the main factors that predicted the outcome. Perforation of the cortical bone was the only reliable predictor of recurrence (p<0.001). Disease-free survival function curves indicated that patients with the mural subtype were at a higher risk of recurrence than patients with the other two subtypes (p=0.003). Poor outcomes of marsupialisation were treated surgically and, to date, no subsequent recurrences have been reported. Marsupialisation is effective for these patients, with a recurrence rate similar to that of radical treatment. The outcomes can be predicted using characteristics of the lesion such as resorption of the root, perforation of the cortical bone, and histopathological subtypes. However, additional studies are required to corroborate these findings.
Copyright © 2019 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histopathological subtype; Marsupialization; Prognosis; Recurrence; Unicystic ameloblastoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31230852     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  5 in total

Review 1.  Ameloblastoma: An Updated Narrative Review of an Enigmatic Tumor.

Authors:  Suhani Ghai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-06

2.  Clinical evaluation of fenestration decompression combined with secondary curettage for ameloblastoma of the jaw: retrospective radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Kailiu Wu; Hao Luo; Zhuang Yuan; Yanan Wang; Xing Qin; Jie He
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Developmental Odontogenic Lesions Associated with the Crown of an Impacted Tooth: A Guide to the Distinct Histologic Features Required for Classification.

Authors:  Susan Müller
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2021-03-15

4.  Recurrence Rates of Intraosseous Ameloblastoma Cases With Conservative or Aggressive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xue Qiao; Junxiu Shi; Jiayi Liu; Jinwen Liu; Yan Guo; Ming Zhong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  αTAT1-induced tubulin acetylation promotes ameloblastoma migration and invasion.

Authors:  Shohei Yoshimoto; Hiromitsu Morita; Kazuhiko Okamura; Akimitsu Hiraki; Shuichi Hashimoto
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 5.662

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.