Literature DB >> 31230839

National trends in centralization and perioperative outcomes of complex operations for cancer.

Yun Song1, Andrew D Tieniber2, Robert E Roses2, Douglas L Fraker2, Rachel R Kelz2, Giorgos C Karakousis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complex cancer operations performed at high-volume and teaching hospitals have been associated with better outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the national trends in the performance of these operations at large teaching hospitals.
METHODS: Patients who underwent elective esophagectomies, gastrectomies, pancreatectomies, and hepatectomies for cancer (2003-2015) were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. We determined average annual percent change (AAPC) in the proportion of operations at large teaching hospitals, inpatient complications, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient mortality.
RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2015, 38,932 esophageal, 104,941 gastric, 96,098 hepatic, and 137,440 pancreatic cancer resections were performed. The proportion at large teaching hospitals increased with an AAPC of 2.5 for esophagectomies (P < .001), 3.6 for gastrectomies (P < .001), and 1.5 for pancreatectomies (P = .039), but did not change for hepatectomies (AAPC 0.48, P = .50). During the study period, mean LOS and inpatient mortality rates at large teaching hospitals decreased across hospital types. By 2013 to 2015, the operations at large hospitals were associated with decreased mortality only for pancreatectomies (odds ratio, 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.91, P = .015).
CONCLUSIONS: Complex cancer operations are performed increasingly at large teaching hospitals, but perioperative outcomes have improved nationally across hospital types. Further studies should identify actionable areas for improvement to ensure accessible quality cancer care.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31230839     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  Improving Oncologic Outcomes for Esophageal Cancer After Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Alexandra I Mansour; Rishindra M Reddy
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.339

2.  Association of Teaching Status and Mortality After Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Miranda B Lam; Kristen Riley; Winta Mehtsun; Jessica Phelan; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha; Laura G Burke
Journal:  Ann Surg Open       Date:  2021-07-23

3.  Hospital volume following major surgery for gastric cancer determines in-hospital mortality rate and failure to rescue: a nation-wide study based on German billing data (2009-2017).

Authors:  J Diers; P Baum; J C Wagner; H Matthes; S Pietryga; N Baumann; K Uttinger; C-T Germer; A Wiegering
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Trends in Textbook Outcomes over Time: Are Optimal Outcomes Following Complex Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer Increasing?

Authors:  J Madison Hyer; Joal D Beane; Gaya Spolverato; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Adrian Diaz; Alessandro Paro; Djhenne Dalmacy; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Rural-Urban Differences in Esophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph G Brungardt; Omar A Almoghrabi; Carolyn B Moore; G John Chen; Alykhan S Nagji
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-12-02

6.  Municipality and Adjusted Gross Income Influence Outcome of Patients Diagnosed with Pancreatic Cancer in a Newly Developed Cancer Center in Mercer County New Jersey, USA, a Single Center Study.

Authors:  Cataldo Doria; Patrick De Deyne; Sherry Dolan; Jooyeun Chung; Karen Yatcilla; Ladan Zarifian; Rona Remstein; Eric Schwartz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.