Timothy D Bryson1, Jacob Ross2, Edward Peterson3, Pamela Harding4. 1. Hypertension & Vascular Research Division, Dept. Internal Medicine, USA; Dept. of Physiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, USA. 2. Hypertension & Vascular Research Division, Dept. Internal Medicine, USA. 3. Dept. of Public Health Sciences Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 4. Hypertension & Vascular Research Division, Dept. Internal Medicine, USA; Dept. of Physiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, USA. Electronic address: phardin1@hfhs.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signals through 4 separate G-protein coupled receptor sub-types to elicit a variety of physiologic and pathophysiological effects. We have previously reported that mice lacking the EP4 receptor in the cardiomyocytes develop heart failure with a phenotype of dilated cardiomyopathy. Also, these mice have increased levels of chemokines, like MCP-5, in their left ventricles. We have recently reported that overexpression of the EP4 receptor could improve cardiac function in the myocardial infarction model. Furthermore, we showed that overexpression of EP4 had an anti-inflammatory effect in the whole left ventricle. It has also been shown that PGE2 can antagonize lipopolysaccharide-induced secretion of chemokines/cytokines in various cell types. We therefore hypothesized that PGE2 inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced MCP-5 secretion in adult mouse cardiac fibroblasts via its EP4 receptor. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our hypothesis was tested using isolated mouse adult ventricular fibroblasts (AVF) treated with LPS. Pre-treatment of the cells with PGE2 and the EP4 agonist CAY10598 resulted in reductions of the pro-inflammatory response induced by LPS. Specifically, we observed reductions in MCP-5 secretion. Western blot analysis showed reductions in phosphorylated Akt and IκBα indicating reduced NF-κB activation. The anti-inflammatory effects of PGE2 and EP4 agonist signaling appeared to be independent of cAMP, p-44/42, or p38 pathways. CONCLUSION: Exogenous treatment of PGE2 and the EP4 receptor agonist blocked the pro-inflammatory actions of LPS. Mechanistically, this was mediated via reduced Akt phosphorylation and inhibition of NF-κB.
BACKGROUND:Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signals through 4 separate G-protein coupled receptor sub-types to elicit a variety of physiologic and pathophysiological effects. We have previously reported that mice lacking the EP4 receptor in the cardiomyocytes develop heart failure with a phenotype of dilated cardiomyopathy. Also, these mice have increased levels of chemokines, like MCP-5, in their left ventricles. We have recently reported that overexpression of the EP4 receptor could improve cardiac function in the myocardial infarction model. Furthermore, we showed that overexpression of EP4 had an anti-inflammatory effect in the whole left ventricle. It has also been shown that PGE2 can antagonize lipopolysaccharide-induced secretion of chemokines/cytokines in various cell types. We therefore hypothesized that PGE2 inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced MCP-5 secretion in adult mouse cardiac fibroblasts via its EP4 receptor. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our hypothesis was tested using isolated mouse adult ventricular fibroblasts (AVF) treated with LPS. Pre-treatment of the cells with PGE2 and the EP4 agonist CAY10598 resulted in reductions of the pro-inflammatory response induced by LPS. Specifically, we observed reductions in MCP-5 secretion. Western blot analysis showed reductions in phosphorylated Akt and IκBα indicating reduced NF-κB activation. The anti-inflammatory effects of PGE2 and EP4 agonist signaling appeared to be independent of cAMP, p-44/42, or p38 pathways. CONCLUSION: Exogenous treatment of PGE2 and the EP4 receptor agonist blocked the pro-inflammatory actions of LPS. Mechanistically, this was mediated via reduced Akt phosphorylation and inhibition of NF-κB.
Authors: Mei Sun; M Anne Opavsky; Duncan J Stewart; Marlene Rabinovitch; Fayez Dawood; Wen-Hu Wen; Peter P Liu Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rui F D S Mesquita; Margaret A Paul; Aida Valmaseda; Asvi Francois; Rita Jabr; Shahzia Anjum; Michael S Marber; Vishwanie Budhram-Mahadeo; Richard J Heads Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Paqui G Través; María Pimentel-Santillana; Luz María G Carrasquero; Raquel Pérez-Sen; Esmerilda G Delicado; Alfonso Luque; Manuel Izquierdo; Paloma Martín-Sanz; María Teresa Miras-Portugal; Lisardo Boscá Journal: J Immunol Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Kishan K Nyati; Kazuya Masuda; Mohammad Mahabub-Uz Zaman; Praveen K Dubey; David Millrine; Jaya P Chalise; Mitsuru Higa; Songling Li; Daron M Standley; Kazunobu Saito; Hamza Hanieh; Tadamitsu Kishimoto Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Timothy D Bryson; Teja S Pandrangi; Safa Z Khan; Jiang Xu; Tengis S Pavlov; Pablo A Ortiz; Edward Peterson; Pamela Harding Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 4.733