Literature DB >> 31228680

Vision and proprioception make equal contributions to path integration in a novel homing task.

Elizabeth R Chrastil1, Grace L Nicora2, Andrew Huang2.   

Abstract

Navigation is a vital cognitive function for animals to find resources and avoid danger, and navigational processes are theorized to be a critical evolutionary foundation of episodic memory. Path integration, the continuous updating of position and orientation during self-motion, is a major contributor to spatial navigation. However, the most common paradigm for testing path integration-triangle completion-includes potential sources of error that cannot be disentangled. Here, we introduce a novel loop closure paradigm to test path integration, including the relative contributions of visual and body-based cues to performance. Contrary to triangle completion, we found that vestibular information alone led to chance performance, while visual optic flow and proprioception made relatively equal and independent contributions. The integration of these two cues was previously unknown, and we found that the two cues were not integrated in a Bayesian ideal manner. Our novel paradigm demonstrates the importance of both vision and proprioception to human path integration and provides the first test of optic flow and proprioception Bayesian cue combination for homing behavior. These findings open up new avenues to study navigation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian integration; Cue combination; Idiothetic; Navigation; Vestibular

Year:  2019        PMID: 31228680     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  5 in total

1.  Does active learning benefit spatial memory during navigation with restricted peripheral field?

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Influence of sensory modality and control dynamics on human path integration.

Authors:  Akis Stavropoulos; Kaushik J Lakshminarasimhan; Jean Laurens; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Using virtual reality to assess dynamic self-motion and landmark cues for spatial updating in children and adults.

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Jessica Stoker; Jeanine K Stefanucci; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-27

4.  Age-Related Changes in Spatial Navigation Are Evident by Midlife and Differ by Sex.

Authors:  Shuying Yu; Alexander P Boone; Chuanxiuyue He; Rie C Davis; Mary Hegarty; Elizabeth R Chrastil; Emily G Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-04-05

5.  Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction.

Authors:  Sevan K Harootonian; Arne D Ekstrom; Robert C Wilson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.