Literature DB >> 31228432

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in the management of overweight and obesity: an international multicenter study.

Sérgio Barrichello1, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura2, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura3, Pichamol Jirapinyo4, Anna Carolina Hoff5, Ricardo José Fittipaldi-Fernandez5, Giorgio Baretta6, João Henrique Felício Lima6, Eduardo N Usuy1, Leonardo Salles de Almeida7, Flavio M Ramos8, Felipe Matz8, Manoel Dos Passos Galvão Neto9, Christopher C Thompson4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Obesity is a pandemic affecting approximately 700 million adults worldwide, with an additional 2 billion overweight. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive endoscopic bariatric therapy that involves remodeling of the greater curvature in an effort to reduce gastric capacity and delay gastric emptying. A variety of ESG suture patterns has been reported. This study is the first to use a uniform "U" stitch pattern across all centers to simplify technical aspects of the procedure and limit cost. This also uniquely assessed outcomes in all body mass index (BMI) categories and changes in metabolic rate, lean body mass, and adipose tissue composition.
METHODS: This is a multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data from 7 centers including patients with overweight and obesity who underwent ESG. Primary outcomes included absolute weight loss, percent total body weight loss (%TWL), change in BMI, and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 6 and 12 months in overweight and obese classes I, II, and III. Secondary outcomes included adipose tissue, lean body mass reduction, and metabolic rate analyzed by bioimpedance. Additionally, immediate or delayed adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Clinical success was defined as achieving ≥25% EWL at 1 year with ≤5% serious AE (SAE) rate following the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)/American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) threshold.
RESULTS: A total of 193 patients underwent ESG during the study period. All groups had >10% TWL and >25% EWL at 6 months of follow-up. On average, %TWL was 14.25% ± 5.26% and 15.06% ± 5.22% and the %EWL 56.15% ± 22.93% and 59.41% ± 25.69% at 6 months and 1 year of follow-up, respectively. %TWL was 8.91% ± .3%, 13.92% ± 5.76%, 16.22% ± 7.69%, and 19.01% ± .95% and %EWL 56.21% ± 2.0%, 62.03% ± 27.63%, 54.13% ± 23.46%, and 46.78% ± 2.43% for overweight and obesity classes I, II, and III, respectively, at 1 year. Male sex, age <41 years, and higher BMI were predictors of achieving a TWL ≥10% at 1-year follow-up. There was a significant reduction in adipose tissue from baseline. SAEs occurred in 1.03%, including 2 perigastric collections needing surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: ESG appears to be feasible, safe, and effective in the treatment of patients with overweight and obesity according to ASGE/ASMBS thresholds.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31228432     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

Review 1.  Endobariatrics and Metabolic Endoscopy: Can We Solve the Obesity Epidemic with Our Scope?

Authors:  Jad Farha; Shahem Abbarh; Zadid Haq; Mohamad I Itani; Andreas Oberbach; Vivek Kumbhari; Dilhana Badurdeen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-11-17

2.  Safety and efficacy of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty worldwide for treatment of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shailendra Singh; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Ahmad Khan; Mohammad Bilal; Michele B Ryan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 3.  Endoscopic bariatrics: current therapies and future directions.

Authors:  Debashis Reja; Clark Zhang; Avik Sarkar
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 4.  Primary Bariatric Procedures.

Authors:  Pichamol Jirapinyo; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Hierarchical task analysis of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty.

Authors:  James Dials; Doga Demirel; Tansel Halic; Suvranu De; Adam Ryason; Shanker Kundumadam; Mohammad Al-Haddad; Mark A Gromski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Intragastric Balloon Versus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shailendra Singh; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Ahmad Khan; Mohammad Bilal; Monica Chowdhry; Michele B Ryan; Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Systematic Review of Innovation Reporting in Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew C Currie; Michael A Glaysher; Natalie S Blencowe; Jamie Kelly
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for High-Risk Patients, High Body Mass Index (> 50 kg/m2) Patients, and Contraindication to Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Renjie Li; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker; Andreas Adler; Maximilian Specht; Wael Eskander; Mahmoud Ismail; Harun Badakhshi; Manoel Passos Galvao; Ricardo Zorron
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Endoscopic gastric body plication for the treatment of obesity: technical success and safety of a novel technique (with video).

Authors:  Pichamol Jirapinyo; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Procedures and devices for bariatric and metabolic endoscopy.

Authors:  Beatrice Orlandini; Camilla Gallo; Ivo Boškoski; Vincenzo Bove; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.