Literature DB >> 31228136

Quality of Life After Total Mesorectal Excision and Rectal Replacement: Comparing Side-to-End, Colon J-Pouch and Straight Colorectal Reconstruction in a Randomized, Phase III Trial (SAKK 40/04).

Karin Ribi1,2, Walter R Marti3, Jürg Bernhard4,5, Felix Grieder6, Michael Graf7, Beat Gloor5, Gaudenz Curti3, Markus Zuber8, Nicolas Demartines9, Christiane Andrieu10, Martin Bigler10, Stefanie Hayoz10, Heinz Wehrli11, Christoph Kettelhack12, Bruno Lerf13, Fabrizio Fasolini14, Christian Hamel15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional outcomes of different reconstruction techniques have an impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), but information on long-term QoL is lacking. We compared QoL among three reconstruction techniques after total mesorectal excision (TME).
METHODS: Quality of life was assessed within a randomized, multicenter trial comparing rectal surgery using side-to-end anastomosis (SEA), colon J-pouch (CJP), and straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA) by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal scale (FACT-C) before randomization and every 6 months up to 2 years post-TME. The primary QoL endpoint was the change in the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), including the FACT-C subscales of physical and functional well-being and colorectal cancer symptoms (CSS), from baseline to month 12. Pair-wise comparisons of changes from baseline (presurgery) to each timepoint between the three arms were analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests.
RESULTS: For the QoL analysis, 257 of 336 randomized patients were in the per protocol evaluation (SEA = 95; CJP = 63; SCA = 99). Significant differences between the reconstruction techniques were found for selected QoL scales up to 12 months, all in favor of CJP. Patients with SEA or SCA reported a clinically relevant deterioration for TOI and CSS at 6 months, those with SCA for CSS also at 12 months after TME. Patients with CJP remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the three reconstruction techniques differ in their effects on QoL at months 6 and 12, these differences did not persist over the whole observation period of 24 months. Patients with a colon J-pouch may benefit with respect to QoL in the short-term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31228136     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07525-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  3 in total

1.  The transverse coloplasty pouch is technically easy and safe and improves functional outcomes after low rectal cancer resection-a single center experience with 397 patients.

Authors:  Stefan Fritz; René Hennig; Christine Kantas; Hansjörg Killguss; André Schaudt; Katharina Feilhauer; Jörg Köninger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Quality of Life in Patients With Rectal Resections and End-to-End Primary Anastomosis Using a Standardized Perioperative Pathway.

Authors:  Jonas Herzberg; Shahram Khadem; Valentin Begemann; Tim Strate; Human Honarpisheh; Salman Yousuf Guraya
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-07

3.  Impact of defecation dysfunction on quality of life in mid-low rectal cancer patients following sphincter-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Baojia Luo; Cong Li; Ying Zhu; Xue Qiu; Liren Li; Zhizhong Pan; Xia Yang; Meichun Zheng
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-05-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.