Literature DB >> 31228134

Prognostic Significance of Residual Axillary Nodal Micrometastases and Isolated Tumor Cells After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Stephanie M Wong1,2, Nora Almana1,2, Jungeun Choi2, Jiani Hu3, Haley Gagnon2, Kelsey Natsuhara2, Abra H Shen2, Stephen DeSantis2, Laura Dominici1,2, Mehra Golshan1,2, Anna Weiss1,2, Jennifer Bellon2,4, Elizabeth A Mittendorf1,2, Tari A King5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of low-volume residual nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unknown.
METHODS: Women with cT1-4N0-1 breast cancer treated with NAC were identified from Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center (DFBWCC) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates according to pathologic nodal status were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with Cox proportional hazards regression used to assess the effect of clinical variables on survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Among 967 DFBWCC patients, 27 (2.8%) had residual isolated tumor cells (ITCs) and 61 (6.3%) had micrometastases. Five-year DFS was significantly worse in those with residual ITCs (73.5%) and micrometastases (74.7%) relative to those who were ypN0 following NAC (88.4%, p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, those with residual ITCs (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-3.81) and micrometastases (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.20-3.81) had increased risk of recurrence relative to ypN0 patients. Among 35,536 NCDB patients, 543 (1.5%) had ITCs and 1132 (3.2%) had micrometastases. Five-year OS estimates were significantly worse with increasing residual nodal burden: ypN0, 88.9%; ypN0[i+], 82.8%; ypN1mi, 79.5%; ypN1, 77.6% (p < 0.001). Compared with patients with ypN0 disease, NCDB patients with ITCs and micrometastases had 1.9- and 2.2-fold risk of death (p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, the effect of low-volume residual disease on mortality was most pronounced in patients with triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-volume residual nodal disease following NAC is associated with poorer DFS and OS relative to those who are node negative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31228134     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07517-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  12 in total

1.  Occult Tumour Cells in Lymph Nodes from Gastric Cancer Patients: Should Isolated Tumour Cells Also Be Considered?

Authors:  A Tavares; X Wen; J Maciel; F Carneiro; M Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Multidisciplinary Management of Breast Cancer With Extensive Regional Nodal Involvement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Matthew P Goetz; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Locoregional Management After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Atif J Khan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Combining Wire Localization of Clipped Nodes with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Alejandra García-Novoa; Benigno Acea-Nebril; Carlota Díaz Carballada; Alberto Bouzón Alejandro; Carmen Conde; Carmen Cereijo Garea; José Ramón Varela; Paz Santiago Freijanes; Silvia Antolín Novoa; Lourdes Calvo Martínez; Inma Díaz; Sofia Rodríguez Martínez; Joaquin Mosquera Oses
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Added value of repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy in FDG-PET/CT node-negative patients with ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  R Haarsma; A A van Loevezijn; M L Donswijk; A N Scholten; M T F D Vrancken Peeters; F H van Duijnhoven
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 6.  Sentinel lymph node assessment in breast cancer-an update on current recommendations.

Authors:  Gábor Cserni; Aoife Maguire; Simonetta Bianchi; Ales Ryska; Anikó Kovács
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  De-Escalation of Breast Cancer Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2021-12-30

8.  Pathological Response in the Breast and Axillary Lymph Nodes after Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment in Patients with Initially Node-Positive Breast Cancer Correlates with Disease Free Survival: An Exploratory Analysis of the GeparOcto Trial.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Andreas Schneeweiss; Volker Möbus; Michael Golatta; Hans Tesch; David Krug; Claus Hanusch; Carsten Denkert; Kristina Lübbe; Jörg Heil; Jens Huober; Beyhan Ataseven; Peter Klare; Markus Hahn; Michael Untch; Karin Kast; Christian Jackisch; Jörg Thomalla; Fenja Seither; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Kerstin Rhiem; Peter A Fasching; Valentina Nekljudova; Sibylle Loibl; Thorsten Kühn
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Optimal Management for Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Julia Foldi; Mariya Rozenblit; Tristen S Park; Christin A Knowlton; Mehra Golshan; Meena Moran; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-07-02

10.  The Clinical Relevance of Target Lymph Node Biopsy after Primary Systemic Therapy in Initially Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Steffi Hartmann; Angrit Stachs; Gesche Schultek; Bernd Gerber; Toralf Reimer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.