Adam Schickedanz1, Adam Sharp2,3, Yi R Hu2, Nirav R Shah4, John L Adams2, Damon Francis5, Artair Rogers5,6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10960 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 960, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. Aschickedanz@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Research and Evaluation Department, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Stanford University Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. Health Leads, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Programs addressing social determinants of health for high-utilizing patients are gaining interest among health systems as an avenue to promote health and decrease utilization. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impacts of a social needs screening and navigation program for adult predicted high utilizers on total medical visit utilization. DESIGN: A prospective, quasi-experimental study using an intent-to-treat propensity-weighted difference-in-differences approach. Stratified analyses assessed intervention effects among three low-socioeconomic status sub-samples: patients in low-income areas, in low-education areas, and with Medicaid insurance. PARTICIPANTS: Predicted high utilizers-patients predicted to be in the highest 1% for total utilization in a large integrated health system. INTERVENTION: A telephonic social needs screening and navigation program. MAIN MEASURES: Primary difference-in-difference analyses compared total visit count utilization, including outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient utilization, between the intervention and control groups at both in-network and out-of-network facilities. Prevalence of social needs among sample patients and their connection rates to social needs resources are also described. KEY RESULTS: The study included 34,225 patients (7107 intervention, 27,118 control). Most (53%) patients screened reported social needs, but only a minority (10%) of those with a need were able to connect with resources to address these needs. Primary analysis found total utilization visits decreased 2.2% (95% CI - 4.5%, 0.1%; p = 0.058) in the intervention group. Stratified analyses showed decreases in total utilization for all low-socioeconomic status subgroups receiving the intervention compared with controls: - 7.0% (95% CI - 11.9%, - 1.9%; p = 0.008) in the low-income area group, - 11.5% (- 17.6%, 5.0%; p < 0.001) in the low-education area group, and - 12.1% (- 18.1%, - 5.6%; p < 0.001) in the Medicaid group. CONCLUSIONS: Social needs navigation programs for high-utilizing patients may have modest effects on utilization for the population overall. However, significant decreases in utilization were found among low-socioeconomic status patients more likely to experience social needs.
BACKGROUND: Programs addressing social determinants of health for high-utilizing patients are gaining interest among health systems as an avenue to promote health and decrease utilization. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impacts of a social needs screening and navigation program for adult predicted high utilizers on total medical visit utilization. DESIGN: A prospective, quasi-experimental study using an intent-to-treat propensity-weighted difference-in-differences approach. Stratified analyses assessed intervention effects among three low-socioeconomic status sub-samples: patients in low-income areas, in low-education areas, and with Medicaid insurance. PARTICIPANTS: Predicted high utilizers-patients predicted to be in the highest 1% for total utilization in a large integrated health system. INTERVENTION: A telephonic social needs screening and navigation program. MAIN MEASURES: Primary difference-in-difference analyses compared total visit count utilization, including outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient utilization, between the intervention and control groups at both in-network and out-of-network facilities. Prevalence of social needs among sample patients and their connection rates to social needs resources are also described. KEY RESULTS: The study included 34,225 patients (7107 intervention, 27,118 control). Most (53%) patients screened reported social needs, but only a minority (10%) of those with a need were able to connect with resources to address these needs. Primary analysis found total utilization visits decreased 2.2% (95% CI - 4.5%, 0.1%; p = 0.058) in the intervention group. Stratified analyses showed decreases in total utilization for all low-socioeconomic status subgroups receiving the intervention compared with controls: - 7.0% (95% CI - 11.9%, - 1.9%; p = 0.008) in the low-income area group, - 11.5% (- 17.6%, 5.0%; p < 0.001) in the low-education area group, and - 12.1% (- 18.1%, - 5.6%; p < 0.001) in the Medicaid group. CONCLUSIONS: Social needs navigation programs for high-utilizing patients may have modest effects on utilization for the population overall. However, significant decreases in utilization were found among low-socioeconomic status patients more likely to experience social needs.
Entities:
Keywords:
health care utilization; high utilizers; social determinants of health; social needs
Authors: Dorota Szymkowiak; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Erin E Johnson; Todd Manning; Thomas P O'Toole Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Arvin Garg; Arlene M Butz; Paul H Dworkin; Rooti A Lewis; Richard E Thompson; Janet R Serwint Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Seth A Berkowitz; Jean Terranova; Caterina Hill; Toyin Ajayi; Todd Linsky; Lori W Tishler; Darren A DeWalt Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst Journal: Health Care Financ Rev Date: 2004
Authors: Amanda L Brewster; Taressa K Fraze; Laura M Gottlieb; Jennifer Frehn; Genevra F Murray; Valerie A Lewis Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Anne Andermann; Gary Bloch; Ritika Goel; Vanessa Brcic; Ginetta Salvalaggio; Shanell Twan; Claire E Kendall; David Ponka; Kevin Pottie Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Sharad I Wadhwani; Andrew F Beck; John Bucuvalas; Laura Gottlieb; Uma Kotagal; Jennifer C Lai Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Anne Andermann; Gary Bloch; Ritika Goel; Vanessa Brcic; Ginetta Salvalaggio; Shanell Twan; Claire E Kendall; David Ponka; Kevin Pottie Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Lucas Zellmer; Bryan Johnson; Ahmed Idris; Christopher J Mehus; Iris W Borowsky Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 5.128