Literature DB >> 31227849

Blunt aortic injuries in the new era: radiologic findings and polytrauma risk assessment dictates management strategy.

Rachel Elizabeth Payne1, Rachel Michelle Nygaard1, Joss Dean Fernandez2, Prateek Sahgal3, Chad John Richardson1, Mohammad Bashir2, Kalpaj Parekh2, Panos Nicolas Vardas4, Yoshikazu Suzuki2, Joel Corvera4, Jon Christopher Krook1, Domenico Calcaterra5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Blunt aortic injuries (BAI) have historically been considered an indication for emergent surgical intervention. Nevertheless, the observation that the outcome of the concomitant traumatic injuries has a major impact on prognosis and the rise of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as an effective therapy for BAI have significantly changed in recent years the treatment algorithm of this condition. Our objective was to identify findings associated with the aortic injury which would be the best predictor of prognosis, with the objective of guiding the decision-making process for selecting the optimal timing of aortic repair.
METHODS: We reviewed blunt aortic injuries from 3 Level I Trauma Centers from July 2008 to December 2016. We analyzed overall and BAI-related 30-day mortality in relation to: hemodynamics, timing of treatment, TEVAR vs open repair, and aortic injury grade as defined by the Society for Vascular Surgery. Based on computed tomographic angiography (CT scan) imaging, we selected the radiologic aortic findings most indicative of high mortality risk, which we defined as "Radiographic Severe Injury" (RSI): (1) total/partial aortic transection, (2) active contrast extravasation, or (3) the association of 2 of more of the following: contained contrast extravasation > 10 mm, periaortic hematoma, and/or mediastinal hematoma with thickness > 10 mm, or significant left pleural effusion.
RESULTS: Of a total of 76 consecutive patients, 50 (66%) underwent immediate repair, 24 (31%) delayed aortic repair, and 2 (3%) died prior to repair. 58 patients (76%) had TEVAR, while 16 (24%) had open repair. Overall mortality was 18% and BAI-related mortality was 13%. In BAI-related mortalities, 70% of patients had RSI. Patients with high risk of overall mortality had hypotension and tachycardia (SBP < 100, HR ≥ 100), high ISS, and required vasopressors. Factors only associated with BAI-related mortality included RSI.
CONCLUSION: CT scan findings suggestive of RSI are predictive of mortality associated with BAI. Radiologic assessment of the severity of the aortic injury with characterization for the presence of RSI may represent the key factors to determine the optimal timing of treatment of the aortic injury and guide the overall treatment strategy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blunt traumatic aortic injury; Endovascular therapy; Open repair; Radiologic assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31227849     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01163-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  34 in total

1.  Vancouver simplified grading system with computed tomographic angiography for blunt aortic injury.

Authors:  Yoan Lamarche; Ferco H Berger; Savvas Nicolaou; Ana-Maria Bilawich; Luck Louis; Joao Rodrigues Inacio; Michael T Janusz; David Evans
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  A comparison of Injury Severity Score and New Injury Severity Score after penetrating trauma: A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Brian P Smith; Amy J Goldberg; John P Gaughan; Mark J Seamon
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Endovascular management of traumatic aortic injuries.

Authors:  Alain Verdant
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Blunt aortic injury.

Authors:  David G Neschis; Thomas M Scalea; William R Flinn; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Randomised comparison of the effects of nicardipine and esmolol on coronary artery wall stress: implications for the risk of plaque rupture.

Authors:  M J Williams; C J Low; G T Wilkins; R A Stewart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Traumatic rupture of the aorta: immediate or delayed repair?

Authors:  Panagiotis N Symbas; Andrew J Sherman; Jeffery M Silver; John D Symbas; Jodi J Lackey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Aortic ruptures in seat belt wearers.

Authors:  E Arajärvi; S Santavirta; J Tolonen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Aortic injury in vehicular trauma.

Authors:  J S Williams; J A Graff; J M Uku; J P Steinig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Emergency repair of traumatic aortic rupture: endovascular versus conventional open repair.

Authors:  Enoch Akowuah; Andreas Baumbach; Peter Wilde; Gianni Angelini; Alan J Bryan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 10.  Endovascular Repair of Traumatic Isthmic Ruptures: Special Concerns.

Authors:  Nikolaos Patelis; Athanasios Katsargyris; Chris Klonaris
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-06-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Major vascular trauma.

Authors:  Kirrily -Rae J Warren; Zsolt J Balogh
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Patterns, management options and outcome of blunt thoracic aortic injuries: a 20-year experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Hassan Al-Thani; Suhail Hakim; Mohammad Asim; Kaleem Basharat; Ayman El-Menyar
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.374

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.