| Literature DB >> 31227608 |
Benzhong Zhao1, Christopher W MacMinn2, Bauyrzhan K Primkulov3, Yu Chen4, Albert J Valocchi4, Jianlin Zhao5, Qinjun Kang6, Kelsey Bruning7, James E McClure8, Cass T Miller7, Abbas Fakhari9, Diogo Bolster9, Thomas Hiller10, Martin Brinkmann11, Luis Cueto-Felgueroso12, Daniel A Cogswell13, Rahul Verma14, Maša Prodanović14, Julien Maes15, Sebastian Geiger15, Morten Vassvik16, Alex Hansen16, Enrico Segre17, Ran Holtzman18,19, Zhibing Yang20, Chao Yuan21, Bruno Chareyre21, Ruben Juanes22.
Abstract
Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.Keywords: capillarity; pattern formation; porous media; simulation; wettability
Year: 2019 PMID: 31227608 PMCID: PMC6628826 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1901619116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205