Literature DB >> 31227521

Improving infant outcomes through implementation of a family integrated care bundle including a parent supporting mobile application.

Jayanta Banerjee1,2, Annie Aloysius1, Karen Mitchell1, Ines Silva1, Dimitrios Rallis1,3, Sunit V Godambe1, Aniko Deierl1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the Integrated Family Delivered Care (IFDC) programme was to improve infant health outcomes and parent experience through education and competency-based training.
DESIGN: In collaboration with veteran parents' focus groups, we created an experienced co-designed care bundle including IFDC mobile application, which together with staff training programme comprised the IFDC programme. Infant outcomes were compared with retrospective controls in a prepost intervention analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Between April 2017 and May 2018, 89 families were recruited; 37 infants completed their entire care episode in our units with a minimum LOS >14 days. From a gestational age (GA) and birth weight-matched retrospective cohort, 57 control infants were selected. Data were also analysed for subgroup under 30 weeks GA (n=20).Infants in the IFDC group were discharged earlier: median corrected GA (36+0 (IQR 35+0-38+0) vs 37+1 (IQR 36+3-38+4) weeks; p=0.003), with shorter median LOS (41 (32-63) vs 55 (41-73) days; p=0.022). This was also evident in the subgroup <30 weeks GA (61 (39-82) vs 76 (68-84) days; p=0.035). Special care days were significantly lower in the IFDC group (30 (21-41) vs 40 (31-46); p=0.006). The subgroup of infants (<30 weeks) reached full suck feeding earlier (median: 47 (37-76) vs 72 (66-82) days; p=0.006).
CONCLUSION: This is the first reported study from a UK tertiary neonatal unit demonstrating significant benefits of family integrated care programme. The IFDC programme has significantly reduced LOS, resulted in the earlier achievement of full enteral and suck feeds. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health economics; health services research; information technology; multidisciplinary team-care; neonatology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31227521     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  4 in total

Review 1.  Family integrated care: Supporting parents as primary caregivers in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Chandra Waddington; Nicole R van Veenendaal; Karel O'Brien; Neil Patel
Journal:  Pediatr Investig       Date:  2021-06-18

2.  Scaling Up the Family Integrated Care Model in a Level IIIC Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Approach to the Methods and Effort Taken for Implementation.

Authors:  Bárbara Moreno-Sanz; María Teresa Montes; Marta Antón; María Teresa Serrada; Marta Cabrera; Adelina Pellicer
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Asynchronous video messaging promotes family involvement and mitigates separation in neonatal care.

Authors:  Sandy Kirolos; Lynsey Sutcliffe; Maria Giatsi Clausen; Carolyn Abernethy; Shanthi Shanmugalingam; Nicole Bauwens; Judith Orme; Kirsty Thomson; Rosemary Grattan; Neil Patel
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Comparison of family centered care with family integrated care and mobile technology (mFICare) on preterm infant and family outcomes: a multi-site quasi-experimental clinical trial protocol.

Authors:  Linda S Franck; Rebecca M Kriz; Robin Bisgaard; Diana M Cormier; Priscilla Joe; Pamela S Miller; Jae H Kim; Carol Lin; Yao Sun
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.