Literature DB >> 31227332

Hospice nurse identification of comfortable and difficult discussion topics: Associations among self-perceived communication effectiveness, nursing stress, life events, and burnout.

Margaret F Clayton1, Eli Iacob2, Maija Reblin3, Lee Ellington2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess hospice nurses' self-perceived communication effectiveness, identify comfortable and difficult discussion topics, and explore associations between self-perceived communication effectiveness, burnout, nursing stress, and life events.
METHODS: 181 nurses completed self-report measures, then listed comfortable and/or difficult patient and caregiver discussion topics.
RESULTS: Nurses were generally experienced (median 9 years, range <1-46 as a registered nurse; median 3 years, range <1-23 as a hospice nurse), reporting overall Effective/Very Effective communication skills (85.6%); 70% desired more communication training. As nursing stress increased perceived overall communication effectiveness decreased (rs = -0.198; p 0.012). As burnout increased overall effectiveness (rs = -0.233; p 0.002) and effectiveness with difficult topics (rs = -0.225; p 0.003) decreased. Content analysis revealed 9 categories considered both comfortable and difficult to discuss; contextual comments provided fuller explanation (e.g. providing general information on the Dying Process was comfortable, discussing Dying process during patient death was difficult). Seven additional categories (e.g. Denial) were deemed uniquely difficult.
CONCLUSION: Hospice nurses perceive themselves as effective communicators, yet want additional training. Perceived communication effectiveness is associated with burnout and stress. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Communication training that focuses on contextually grounded topics identified by participants may optimize communication between hospice nurses, patients and caregivers.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burnout; Cancer communication; Caregivers; Comfortable and difficult communication topics; Communication effectiveness; Hospice; Nursing; Stressful events

Year:  2019        PMID: 31227332      PMCID: PMC6717031          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  26 in total

1.  A Systematic Review in Support of the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, Fourth Edition.

Authors:  Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Christine Chen; Laura Raaen; Aneesa Motala; Anne M Walling; Margaret Chamberlin; Claire O'Hanlon; Jody Larkin; Karl Lorenz; Olamigoke Akinniranye; Susanne Hempel
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  ELNEC: going strong after 10 years. Transforming end-of-life care.

Authors:  Roxanne Nelson
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.220

3.  Oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication: a pilot mailed survey of oncology nursing society members.

Authors:  Paul R Helft; Amy Chamness; Colin Terry; Margaret Uhrich
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 4.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Mojtaba Vaismoradi; Hannele Turunen; Terese Bondas
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  Training nurses for interdisciplinary communication with families in the intensive care unit: an intervention.

Authors:  Nina S Krimshtein; Carol A Luhrs; Kathleen A Puntillo; Therese B Cortez; Elayne E Livote; Joan D Penrod; Judith E Nelson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  The Social Readjustment Rating Scale.

Authors:  T H Holmes; R H Rahe
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Hospice nurse communication with patients with cancer and their family caregivers.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Maija Reblin; Margaret F Clayton; Patricia Berry; Kathleen Mooney
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 8.  Death in the Digital Age: A Systematic Review of Information and Communication Technologies in End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Kirsten Ostherr; Peter Killoran; Ross Shegog; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Impact of a Simulation-Based Communication Workshop on Resident Preparedness for End-of-Life Communication in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Abraham Markin; Diego F Cabrera-Fernandez; Rebecca M Bajoka; Samantha M Noll; Sean M Drake; Rana L Awdish; Dana S Buick; Maria S Kokas; Kristen A Chasteen; Michael P Mendez
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2015-06-25

10.  Stress, burnout and doctors' attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: a twelve year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates.

Authors:  I C McManus; A Keeling; E Paice
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Pilot Observational Exploratory Study of Well-Being in Hospice Interdisciplinary Team Members.

Authors:  Catherine Schneider; Alycia Bristol; Ariel Ford; Shih-Yin Lin; Abraham A Brody; Amy Witkoski Stimpfel
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.090

2.  Compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue in haematology cancer nurses: A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Fengjiao Chen; Yamei Leng; Jiping Li; Yuhuan Zheng
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2022-05-08

3.  Where would Canadians prefer to die? Variation by situational severity, support for family obligations, and age in a national study.

Authors:  Laura M Funk; Corey S Mackenzie; Maria Cherba; Nicole Del Rosario; Marian Krawczyk; Andrea Rounce; Kelli Stajduhar; S Robin Cohen
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.113

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.