Literature DB >> 31227328

Characteristics and Consequences of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Pain among Cardiac Sonographers Compared with Peer Employees: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study.

Sergio Barros-Gomes1, Nicholas Orme1, Lara F Nhola1, Christopher Scott2, Karen Helfinstine1, Sorin V Pislaru1, Garvan C Kane1, Mandeep Singh3, Patricia A Pellikka4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal pain (WRMSP) among cardiac sonographers has been incompletely studied. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency, magnitude, and impact of WRMSP among cardiac sonographers with those of a control group of peer employees.
METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to cardiac sonographers and peer employees assigned to different occupational exposures within the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at 10 Mayo Clinic facilities in four states.
RESULTS: A total of 416 subjects completed the survey: 111 sonographers (27%) and 305 peer-employee control subjects (73%). The mean age was 43 ± 11 years, and 307 subjects (74%) were women. The sonographers' response rate was 86%. WRMSP was experienced by a large majority of sonographers (95 [86%] vs 140 [46%] for control subjects, P < .001). This association persisted after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio, 8.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.33-15.46; P < .001). Compared with coworkers, sonographers' pain was perceived as more severe (pain score > 5 on a 10-point scale; 62% vs 29%, P < .001) and as getting worse (14% vs 2%, P < .001). The neck (58% vs 25%), shoulder (51% vs 11%), lower back (44% vs 26%), and hand (42% vs 9%) were the most frequently affected body regions (P < .001 for each). The presence of WRMSP in sonographers was more often associated with interference in performance of daily (37% vs 12%, P < .001) and work-related (42% vs 11%, P < .001) activities. Because of pain, sonographers more often sought medical evaluation (27% vs 12%, P < .001), missed work (13% vs 4%, P < .001), had work restrictions (5% vs 0.6%, P = .005), and were considering changing employment (9% vs 0.5%, P < .001) compared with control subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: WRMSP in cardiac sonographers is much more prevalent and severe compared with peer employees. WRMSP in sonographers affects daily and work-related activities, as well as future employment plans. Further studies assessing the potential role of preventive interventions are needed.
Copyright © 2019 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Echocardiography; Ergonomics; Occupational pain; Ultrasound; Work-related musculoskeletal disorders

Year:  2019        PMID: 31227328     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  4 in total

1.  ASE Membership in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Hanging out, Hanging on, Together.

Authors:  Ritu Thamman; Bonita Anderson
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Time Course and Risk Profile of Work-Related Neck Disability: A Longitudinal Latent Class Growth Analysis.

Authors:  Yanfei Xie; Brooke K Coombes; Lucy Thomas; Venerina Johnston
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 3.  Ergonomics in Interventional Radiology: Awareness Is Mandatory.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Leo Razakamanantsoa; Mohamed Ben Ammar; Raphael Lehrer; Idriss Haffaf; Sanaa El-Mouhadi; Francois Gardavaud; Milan Najdawi; Matthias Barral
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Obstetric ultrasound: where are we and where are we going?

Authors:  Jacques S Abramowicz
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-08-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.