| Literature DB >> 31226954 |
Raden Tina Dewi Judistiani1,2, Sefita Aryuti Nirmala3,4, Meilia Rahmawati5, Reni Ghrahani4,6,7, Yessika Adelwin Natalia3, Adhi Kristianto Sugianli7,8, Agnes Rengga Indrati4,7,8, Oki Suwarsa4,7,9, Budi Setiabudiawan4,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy carries potential threat to fetal well being. Natural conversion of vitamin D in the skin can be facilitated by direct ultra violet B (UVB) radiation, but the effect is reduced by wearing umbrellas, clothes, or sunblock cream. Muslim women wear hijab that allows only face and hands to be seen. With increasing proportion of muslim women wearing hijab and the lack of vitamin D fortification and fish consumption in Indonesia, it poses a problem for vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women. This study aimed at finding the best timing of UVB exposure and the duration of exposure which can be suggested to prevent vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women, for those wearing hijab or not.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31226954 PMCID: PMC6588851 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2306-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Calculations of total body surface area exposed to ultra violet B radiation: Combination of Mosteller and Wallace Formula
| Clothing | Exposed area | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Without hijab | Long sleeved top, long bottom (trousers or skirt) | Head, neck, hands, feet | 9 + (2*2.5) + (2*2) = 18 |
| Short sleeved top, short bottom (trousers or skirt) | Head, neck, part of upper arms, lower arms, hands, part of upper thighs, knees, calves, shinbones, feet | 9 + (2*6) + (2*13.5) = 48 | |
| Short sleeved top, long bottom (trousers or skirt) | Head, neck, part of upper arms, lower arms, hands, feet | 9 + (2*6) + (2*2) = 25 | |
| With hijab | Long top and bottom without socks | Face, hands, feet | 4.5 + (2*2.5) + (2*2) = 13,5 |
| Long top and bottom with socks | Face, hands | 3 + (2*2.5) = 8 |
Fig. 1Selection of study participants
Characteristics of Pregnant Women
| Characteristics | Vitamin D status | Total | Mean (SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficient | Insufficient | Normal | ||||
| ( | ( | ( | ||||
| Use of sunscreen | 0.19 | |||||
| No | 145 | 26 | 7 | 178 | ||
| Yes | 19 | 7 | 0 | 26 | ||
| Age | 28.4 (5.83) | 0.27 | ||||
| < 20 years | 11 | 1 | 0 | 12 | ||
| 20–34 years | 130 | 27 | 4 | 161 | ||
| ≥ 35 years | 23 | 5 | 3 | 31 | ||
| Education | < 0.001 | |||||
| Elementary school | 38 | 14 | 7 | 59 | ||
| Middle school | 45 | 12 | 0 | 57 | ||
| High school | 54 | 5 | 0 | 59 | ||
| Diploma/bachelor | 27 | 2 | 0 | 29 | ||
| Occupation | 0.18 | |||||
| Housewife | 113 | 29 | 6 | 148 | ||
| Civil servant | 37 | 2 | 1 | 40 | ||
| Others | 14 | 2 | 0 | 16 | ||
| Pre-pregnancy body mass index (kg/m2)a | 23.7 (4.84) | 0.41 | ||||
| Underweight (< 18.5) | 14 | 2 | 1 | 17 | ||
| Normal (18.5–24.99) | 83 | 32 | 4 | 119 | ||
| Overweight (25–29.99) | 32 | 5 | 2 | 39 | ||
| Obese (> 30) | 25 | 4 | 0 | 29 | ||
| Parity | 0.17 | |||||
| 0 | 70 | 10 | 0 | 80 | ||
| 1 | 54 | 13 | 4 | 71 | ||
| ≥ 2 | 40 | 10 | 3 | 53 | ||
| Use of veil ( | 0.002 | |||||
| No | 77 | 25 | 6 | 108 | ||
| Yes | 87 | 8 | 1 | 96 | ||
P-value was calculated using Chi-square test.
aBody mass index clasification by WHO 2018, available from http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.h
Average hourly UVB intensity in September 2016 – March 2017
| Time (hour) | Average hourly UVB intensity (watt/m2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September | October | November | December | January | February | March | |
| 00.00 – 06.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 06.00 – 07.00 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 0.47 | 3.37 |
| 07.00 – 08.00 | 4.9 | 4 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 0.18 | 2.99 | 6.35 |
| 08.00 – 09.00 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 4.1 | 5.2 | 0.3 | 3.85 | 7.79 |
| 09.00 – 10.00 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 0.47 | 6.95 | 10.4 |
| 10.00 – 11.00 | 9.9 | 11 | 9 | 9.7 | 0.63 | 9.65 | 12.6 |
| 11.00 – 12.00 | 9.7 | 12 | 8.6 | 12 | 0.67 | 11.9 | 13.5 |
| 12.00 – 13.00 | 9.7 | 10 | 8.9 | 13 | 0.63 | 12.7 | 13.3 |
| 13.00 – 14.00 | 8 | 9.4 | 8 | 12 | 0.54 | 11 | 11.2 |
| 14.00 – 15.00 | 7.4 | 7.1 | 6.1 | 9 | 0.45 | 8.16 | 9.75 |
| 15.00 – 16.00 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 3.9 | 6.6 | 0.3 | 5.39 | 7.34 |
| 16.00 – 17.00 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 0.16 | 3.01 | 5.35 |
| 17.00 – 18.00 | 1.3 | 1 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 0.06 | 1.02 | 1.42 |
| 18.00 – 00.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Correlation of total body surface area, percentage of body area exposed, and ultra violet B intensity, with maternal serum vitamin D level
| Correlation coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|
| TBSA (m2) exposed to sun with maternal vitamin D | 0.360 | < 0.001 |
| Percentage of body area exposed to sun with maternal vitamin D | 0.390 | < 0.001 |
| UVB intensity (MED/hour) with maternal vitamin D | 0.153 | 0.029 |
Associations among factors influencing UV radiation and maternal serum vitamin D level. Data collection form (Additional file 1)
| Exposure | Outcome | cOR (95% CI) | p-value | aOR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBSA (m2) exposed to sun | normal | ref | |||
| deficiency | 1.89E-107 (2.24E-204 - 1.6E-10) | 0.03 | 3.76E-93 (1.39E-226 - 1.02E+41) | 0.18 | |
| insufficiency | 3.22E-22 (3.35E-124 - 3.12E+80) | 0.68 | 2.14-16 (3.97E-152 - 1.15E+120) | 0.82 | |
| Percentage of body area exposed to sun | normal | ref | |||
| deficiency | 0.93 (0.87-0.99) | 0.02 | 0.94 (0.86-1.02) | 0.12 | |
| insufficiency | 0.99 (0.93-1.05) | 0.69 | 0.99 (0.91-1.08) | 0.83 | |
| UVB intensity (MED/hour) | normal | ref | |||
| deficiency | 0.74 (0.23-2.4) | 0.23 | 1.85 (0.26-13.13) | 0.54 | |
| insufficiency | 1.23 (0.37-4.13) | 0.37 | 2.98 (0.41-21.49) | 0.28 |
cOR crude odds ratio
aOR adjusted odds ratio by age, parity, pre-pregnancy BMI, education, and the use of sunscreen