Literature DB >> 31226367

Mathematical modeling of the heterogeneous distributions of nanomedicines in solid tumors.

Hua He1, Can Liu2, Yuhui Liu3, Xiaoquan Liu3, Yun Wu4, Jianghong Fan5, Liang Zhao5, Yanguang Cao6.   

Abstract

The distribution of nanomedicines inside solid tumors is often restricted to perivascular areas, leaving most distal tumor cells out of reach. This partly explains modest patient benefit of many nanomedicines compared to their free-form counterparts. The objective for this study is to develop a mathematical model to quantitatively analyze this phenomenon and the influencing factors to such perivascular distribution and seek for effective strategies to alleviate this. A spatial tumor distribution model was firstly constructed to mimic the geometrical structure of tumor vessels and the surrounding tumor cells. This tumor model was further integrated with a systemic pharmacokinetics model for nanoparticles. A variety of factors on the tumor spatial distributions of nanomedicines were considered in the model. With the model, we quantified the effect of these influencing factors on tumor delivery efficacy (ID %), the magnitude of heterogeneous distribution (H index), and the effect of enhanced permeability and retention (EPR). In particularly, we compared the spatial distributions of the nanoparticles and the free payloads insides tumors. The model predicted high degrees of distributional heterogeneity for both nanoparticles and free payloads. The degree of heterogeneity and the influencing factors for free payloads were markedly different from those for nanoparticles. We found that nanoparticle diffusion coefficient was the most effective factor in reducing the nanoparticle H index but exerted moderate influence on the free payloads H index. The most effective factor in reducing the H index of free payload was payload diffusion coefficient. The factors that improved free payload distribution were closely associated with higher drug efficacy. In contrast, the factors that improved nanoparticle spatial distributions did not always confer improved anti-tumor efficacy of the delivered drug. These findings highlight the importance of assessing the heterogeneous free payload distribution in tumors for the development of effective nanomedicines.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heterogeneous distribution; Mathematical modeling; Nanoparticles; Solid tumors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31226367      PMCID: PMC6717548          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  4 in total

Review 1.  An Updated Review on EPR-Based Solid Tumor Targeting Nanocarriers for Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Majid Sharifi; William C Cho; Asal Ansariesfahani; Rahil Tarharoudi; Hedyeh Malekisarvar; Soyar Sari; Samir Haj Bloukh; Zehra Edis; Mohamadreza Amin; Jason P Gleghorn; Timo L M Ten Hagen; Mojtaba Falahati
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumors Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Approach.

Authors:  Yi-Hsien Cheng; Chunla He; Jim E Riviere; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere; Zhoumeng Lin
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Preparation of high drug-loading celastrol nanosuspensions and their anti-breast cancer activities in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Tiantian Huang; Yian Wang; Yiping Shen; Hui Ao; Yifei Guo; Meihua Han; Xiangtao Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Enhanced Drug Delivery to Solid Tumors via Drug-Loaded Nanocarriers: An Image-Based Computational Framework.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi Kashkooli; M Soltani; Mohammad Masoud Momeni; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.