Catherine A Chappell1, Ishana Harkoo2, Daniel W Szydlo3, Katherine E Bunge4, Devika Singh5, Clemensia Nakabiito6, Felix Mhlanga7, Betty Kamira6, Jeanna M Piper8, Jennifer E Balkus9, Sharon L Hillier4. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: chappellca@upmc.edu. 2. CAPRISA-University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, SA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA. 5. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. 6. Makerere University-Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, UG. 7. University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, ZI. 8. Division of AIDS/NIAID/US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 9. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method uptake has been low within the context of HIV prevention trials. Within a multinational study (MTN-020/ASPIRE), the Contraceptive Action Team improved LARC accessibility and uptake. In this secondary analysis, we determined the rate of contraceptive method continuation among the women enrolled. STUDY DESIGN: ASPIRE was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III safety and effectiveness study of the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV-1 prevention. Between 2012 and 2014, sexually active women aged 18-45 from Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe were enrolled. All participants were required to use contraception for enrollment to the study and could choose between all highly effective contraceptive methods available in their respective countries. Women were seen monthly and could change methods at any time. Continuation rates from study enrollment to 6 and 12 months were determined. RESULTS: The overall contraceptive method continuation rate was 77% (1972/2551) at 6 months and 66% (1694/2551) at 12 months. The 6- and 12-month continuation rates were highest for implantable contraceptives (89%, 82%) followed by copper intrauterine device (83%, 77%). Rates of continuation for injectable contraceptives depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (80%, 69%) and norethisterone enanthate (71%, 54%) were higher than for oral contraceptives, which were continued at 47% at 6 months and 35% at 12 months. The continuation rates of all methods did not differ by users with and without previous contraceptive experience. CONCLUSIONS: LARC methods have the highest rates of continuation at 12 months and should be routinely offered in the context of HIV prevention trials in sub-Saharan Africa. IMPLICATIONS: Intrauterine devices and contraceptive implant continuation was high at 12 months among women participating in an HIV prevention trial in sub-Saharan Africa and LARCs and should be routinely offered.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method uptake has been low within the context of HIV prevention trials. Within a multinational study (MTN-020/ASPIRE), the Contraceptive Action Team improved LARC accessibility and uptake. In this secondary analysis, we determined the rate of contraceptive method continuation among the women enrolled. STUDY DESIGN: ASPIRE was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III safety and effectiveness study of the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV-1 prevention. Between 2012 and 2014, sexually active women aged 18-45 from Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe were enrolled. All participants were required to use contraception for enrollment to the study and could choose between all highly effective contraceptive methods available in their respective countries. Women were seen monthly and could change methods at any time. Continuation rates from study enrollment to 6 and 12 months were determined. RESULTS: The overall contraceptive method continuation rate was 77% (1972/2551) at 6 months and 66% (1694/2551) at 12 months. The 6- and 12-month continuation rates were highest for implantable contraceptives (89%, 82%) followed by copper intrauterine device (83%, 77%). Rates of continuation for injectable contraceptives depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (80%, 69%) and norethisterone enanthate (71%, 54%) were higher than for oral contraceptives, which were continued at 47% at 6 months and 35% at 12 months. The continuation rates of all methods did not differ by users with and without previous contraceptive experience. CONCLUSIONS:LARC methods have the highest rates of continuation at 12 months and should be routinely offered in the context of HIV prevention trials in sub-Saharan Africa. IMPLICATIONS: Intrauterine devices and contraceptive implant continuation was high at 12 months among women participating in an HIV prevention trial in sub-Saharan Africa and LARCs and should be routinely offered.
Authors: Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim; Janet A Frohlich; Anneke C Grobler; Cheryl Baxter; Leila E Mansoor; Ayesha B M Kharsany; Sengeziwe Sibeko; Koleka P Mlisana; Zaheen Omar; Tanuja N Gengiah; Silvia Maarschalk; Natasha Arulappan; Mukelisiwe Mlotshwa; Lynn Morris; Douglas Taylor Journal: Science Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Salim S Abdool Karim; Barbra A Richardson; Gita Ramjee; Irving F Hoffman; Zvavahera M Chirenje; Taha Taha; Muzala Kapina; Lisa Maslankowski; Anne Coletti; Albert Profy; Thomas R Moench; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Benoît Mâsse; Sharon L Hillier; Lydia Soto-Torres Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jeanne M Marrazzo; Gita Ramjee; Barbra A Richardson; Kailazarid Gomez; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Gonasagrie Nair; Thesla Palanee; Clemensia Nakabiito; Ariane van der Straten; Lisa Noguchi; Craig W Hendrix; James Y Dai; Shayhana Ganesh; Baningi Mkhize; Marthinette Taljaard; Urvi M Parikh; Jeanna Piper; Benoît Mâsse; Cynthia Grossman; James Rooney; Jill L Schwartz; Heather Watts; Mark A Marzinke; Sharon L Hillier; Ian M McGowan; Z Mike Chirenje Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chelsea B Polis; Kathryn M Curtis; Philip C Hannaford; Sharon J Phillips; Tsungai Chipato; James N Kiarie; Daniel J Westreich; Petrus S Steyn Journal: AIDS Date: 2016-11-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Kathryn Peebles; Flavia M Kiweewa; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Catherine Chappell; Devika Singh; Katherine E Bunge; Logashvari Naidoo; Bonus Makanani; Nitesha Jeenarain; Doerieyah Reynolds; Sharon L Hillier; Elizabeth R Brown; Jared M Baeten; Jennifer E Balkus Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: C W Rothschild; B A Richardson; B L Guthrie; P Kithao; T Omurwa; J Mukabi; L S Callegari; E L Lokken; G John-Stewart; J A Unger; J Kinuthia; A L Drake Journal: BJOG Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 7.331