Literature DB >> 312260

Contact sensitivity and the DNA response in mice to high and low doses of oxazolone: low dose unresponsiveness following painting and feeding and its prevention by pretreatment with cyclophosphamide.

G L Asherson, M A Perera, W R Thomas.   

Abstract

Cyclophosphamide was used to assess the role of suppressor cells in the contact sensitivity reaction. A single painting with 300 microgram and 30 microgram oxazolone produced poor contact sensitivity reactions (ear swelling). Cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) 2 days before painting increased the response to the lower doses but had less effect on the response to 3 mg oxazolone. A single feed with 10 mg oxazolone caused strong contact sensitivity while lower doses (10-1000 microgram) caused poor responses. Cyclophosphamide increased the response to the lower doses but not to the highest dose of oxazolone. These results suggested that the poor response to painting and feeding lower doses of oxazolone was due to a suppressor system which was sensitive to cyclophosphamide. A different result was obtained when contact sensitivity was measured by arrival of radioactively labelled cells. Cyclophosphamide had the greatest effect on cell arrival when high doses were fed. This indicates that ear swelling and cell arrival measure separate aspects of the contact sensitivity response. The lower doses of oxazolone, which caused little contact sensitivity, reduced the response to a standard immunizing dose. This low dose unresponsiveness occurred after either painting or feeding (Chase-Sulzberger phenomenon). It did not occur in mice treated with cyclophosphamide before the first exposure to oxazolone. This suggested that the low dose unresponsiveness was due to suppressor cells. The response to oxazolone was also assessed by DNA synthesis in the regional lymph nodes. A small dose of oxazolone (30 microgram) caused a peak of DNA synthesis on day four while a high dose (3 mg) caused a peak on day three. Pretreatment with cyclophosphamide depressed the response to 30 microgram although it increased contact sensitivity. The secondary response was smaller than the primary on days 3, 4 and 5 after immunization but larger on day two. The depression but not the increase was prevented by cyclophosphamide and was probably due to a suppressor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 312260      PMCID: PMC1457569     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  24 in total

1.  Production of immunity and unresponsiveness in the mouse by feeding contact sensitizing agents and the role of suppressor cells in the peyer's patches, mesenteric lymph nodes and other lymphoid tissues.

Authors:  G L Asherson; M Zembala; M A Perera; B Mayhew; W R Thomas
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.868

2.  Influence of cyclophosphamide on delayed hypersensitivity and acquired cellular resistance to Listeria monocytogenes in the mouse.

Authors:  J A Kerckhaert; F M Hofhuis; J M Willers
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Control of the immune reaction: T cells in immunized mice which depress the in vivo DNA synthesis response in the lymph nodes to skin painting with the contact sensitizing agent picryl chloride.

Authors:  P Wood; G L Asherson; B Mayhew; W R Thomas; M Zembala
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 4.868

4.  Anti-DNP antibody response after the topical application of DNFB in mice.

Authors:  C Takahashi; S Nishikawa; Y Katsura; T Izumi
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  The relation of immune depression and B-cell stimulation during the development of delayed hypersensitivity to soluble antigens.

Authors:  R J Scheper; D Parker; B Noble; J L Turk
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Effect of cyclophosphamide on delayed hypersensitivity to Staphylococcus aureus in mice.

Authors:  C S Easmon; A A Glynn
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  The relation between B-cell stimulation and delayed hypersensitivity. The effect of cyclophosphamide pretreatment on antibody production.

Authors:  B Noble; D Parker; R J Scheper; J L Turk
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  The value of an assessment of erythema and increase in thickness of the skin reaction for a full appreciation of the nature of delayed hypersensitivity in the guinea pig.

Authors:  R J Scheper; B Noble; D Parker; J L Turk
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol       Date:  1977

9.  Immune suppression with supraoptimal doses of antigen in contact sensitivity. I. Demonstration of suppressor cells and their sensitivity to cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  M S Sy; S D Miller; H N Claman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Adult thymectomy prevention of the appearance of suppressor T cells which depress contact sensitivity to picryl chloride and reversal of adult thymectomy effect by thymus extract.

Authors:  G L Asherson; M Zembala; B Mayhew; A Goldstein
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  8 in total

1.  T-cell lymphokine response to orally administered proteins during priming and unresponsiveness.

Authors:  G F Hoyne; M G Callow; J Kuhlman; W R Thomas
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  Immunological responses to fed protein antigens in mice. IV. Effects of stimulating the reticuloendothelial system on oral tolerance and intestinal immunity to ovalbumin.

Authors:  A M Mowat; D M Parrot
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Immunological responses to fed protein antigens in mice. II. Oral tolerance for CMI is due to activation of cyclophosphamide-sensitive cells by gut-processed antigen.

Authors:  S Strobel; A M Mowat; H E Drummond; M G Pickering; A Ferguson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Inhibition of T suppressor cell function by local administration of an active cyclophosphamide derivative at the sensitization site.

Authors:  J Limpens; R J Scheper
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Induction of contact sensitivity and antigenic competition by the intravenous administration of contact sensitizers.

Authors:  Y Nakano; K Nakano
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Inhibition of T-cell responses by feeding peptides containing major and cryptic epitopes: studies with the Der p I allergen.

Authors:  G F Hoyne; M G Callow; M C Kuo; W R Thomas
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Low zone tolerance to contact allergens in mice: a functional role for CD8+ T helper type 2 cells.

Authors:  K Steinbrink; C Sorg; E Macher
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Oxazolone colitis: A murine model of T helper cell type 2 colitis treatable with antibodies to interleukin 4.

Authors:  M Boirivant; I J Fuss; A Chu; W Strober
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 14.307

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.