Literature DB >> 31225977

Crosshatch nanofiber networks of tunable interfiber spacing induce plasticity in cell migration and cytoskeletal response.

Aniket Jana1, Intawat Nookaew2, Jugroop Singh3, Bahareh Behkam1,3, Aime T Franco2, Amrinder S Nain1,3.   

Abstract

Biomechanical cues within tissue microenvironments are critical for maintaining homeostasis, and their disruption can contribute to malignant transformation and metastasis. Once transformed, metastatic cancer cells can migrate persistently by adapting (plasticity) to changes in the local fibrous extracellular matrix, and current strategies to recapitulate persistent migration rely exclusively on the use of aligned geometries. Here, the controlled interfiber spacing in suspended crosshatch networks of nanofibers induces cells to exhibit plasticity in migratory behavior (persistent and random) and the associated cytoskeletal arrangement. At dense spacing (3 and 6 µm), unexpectedly, elongated cells migrate persistently (in 1 dimension) at high speeds in 3-dimensional shapes with thick nuclei, and short focal adhesion cluster (FAC) lengths. With increased spacing (18 and 36 µm), cells attain 2-dimensional morphologies, have flattened nuclei and longer FACs, and migrate randomly by rapidly detaching their trailing edges that strain the nuclei by ∼35%. At 54-µm spacing, kite-shaped cells become near stationary. Poorly developed filamentous actin stress fibers are found only in cells on 3-µm networks. Gene-expression profiling shows a decrease in transcriptional potential and a differential up-regulation of metabolic pathways. The consistency in observed phenotypes across cell lines supports using this platform to dissect hallmarks of plasticity in migration in vitro.-Jana, A., Nookaew, I., Singh, J., Behkam, B., Franco, A. T., Nain, A. S. Crosshatch nanofiber networks of tunable interfiber spacing induce plasticity in cell migration and cytoskeletal response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D migration; 3D migration; cell-ECM interaction; nucleus geometry; persistent cell migration

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31225977      PMCID: PMC6766658          DOI: 10.1096/fj.201900131R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.834


  91 in total

1.  Direct comparisons of the morphology, migration, cell adhesions, and actin cytoskeleton of fibroblasts in four different three-dimensional extracellular matrices.

Authors:  Kirsi M Hakkinen; Jill S Harunaga; Andrew D Doyle; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Focal adhesion size uniquely predicts cell migration.

Authors:  Dong-Hwee Kim; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels.

Authors:  Hug Aubin; Jason W Nichol; Ché B Hutson; Hojae Bae; Alisha L Sieminski; Donald M Cropek; Payam Akhyari; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Random versus directionally persistent cell migration.

Authors:  Ryan J Petrie; Andrew D Doyle; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling.

Authors:  Kandice R Levental; Hongmei Yu; Laura Kass; Johnathon N Lakins; Mikala Egeblad; Janine T Erler; Sheri F T Fong; Katalin Csiszar; Amato Giaccia; Wolfgang Weninger; Mitsuo Yamauchi; David L Gasser; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Intravital imaging of stromal cell dynamics in tumors.

Authors:  Marja Lohela; Zena Werb
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Shape-dependent cell migration and focal adhesion organization on suspended and aligned nanofiber scaffolds.

Authors:  Kevin Sheets; Stephen Wunsch; Colin Ng; Amrinder S Nain
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Cell stiffness is a biomarker of the metastatic potential of ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Wenwei Xu; Roman Mezencev; Byungkyu Kim; Lijuan Wang; John McDonald; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An extracellular-matrix-specific GEF-GAP interaction regulates Rho GTPase crosstalk for 3D collagen migration.

Authors:  Matthew L Kutys; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Enriching the gene set analysis of genome-wide data by incorporating directionality of gene expression and combining statistical hypotheses and methods.

Authors:  Leif Väremo; Jens Nielsen; Intawat Nookaew
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  13 in total

1.  Rules of contact inhibition of locomotion for cells on suspended nanofibers.

Authors:  Jugroop Singh; Aldwin Pagulayan; Brian A Camley; Amrinder S Nain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Engineering macroscale cell alignment through coordinated toolpath design using support-assisted 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  Jia Min Lee; Wai Yee Yeong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Bioenergetics underlying single-cell migration on aligned nanofiber scaffolds.

Authors:  Abinash Padhi; Alexander H Thomson; Justin B Perry; Grace N Davis; Ryan P McMillan; Sandra Loesgen; Elizabeth N Kaweesa; Rakesh Kapania; Amrinder S Nain; David A Brown
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.249

4.  Dynamic Heterochromatin States in Anisotropic Nuclei of Cells on Aligned Nanofibers.

Authors:  Wenjie Liu; Abinash Padhi; Xiaohui Zhang; Jairaj Narendran; Mark A Anastasio; Amrinder S Nain; Joseph Irudayaraj
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 18.027

5.  Tunneling Nanotubes between Cells Migrating in ECM Mimicking Fibrous Environments.

Authors:  Aniket Jana; Katherine Ladner; Emil Lou; Amrinder S Nain
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  The Thyroid Tumor Microenvironment: Potential Targets for Therapeutic Intervention and Prognostication.

Authors:  Laura MacDonald; Jonathan Jenkins; Grace Purvis; Joshua Lee; Aime T Franco
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  Cell Fragment Formation, Migration, and Force Exertion on Extracellular Mimicking Fiber Nanonets.

Authors:  Abinash Padhi; Brooke E Danielsson; Deema S Alabduljabbar; Ji Wang; Daniel E Conway; Rakesh K Kapania; Amrinder S Nain
Journal:  Adv Biol (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-24

8.  Quantitative biophysical metrics for rapid evaluation of ovarian cancer metastatic potential.

Authors:  Apratim Mukherjee; Haonan Zhang; Katherine Ladner; Megan Brown; Jacob Urbanski; Joseph P Grieco; Rakesh K Kapania; Emil Lou; Bahareh Behkam; Eva M Schmelz; Amrinder S Nain
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 9.  The epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the cytoskeleton in bioengineered systems.

Authors:  Susan E Leggett; Alex M Hruska; Ming Guo; Ian Y Wong
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 7.525

10.  Individual cells generate their own self-reinforcing contact guidance cues through local matrix fiber remodeling.

Authors:  Michael Pamonag; Abigail Hinson; Elisha J Burton; Nojan Jafari; Dominic Sales; Sarah Babcock; Rozlan Basha; Xiaofeng Hu; Kristopher E Kubow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.