Literature DB >> 31225906

Preoperative PET/CT does not accurately detect extrauterine disease in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk endometrial cancer: A prospective study.

Katherine I Stewart1, Beth Chasen2, William Erwin3, Nicole Fleming1, Shannon N Westin1, Shayan Dioun4, Michael Frumovitz1, Pedro T Ramirez1, Karen H Lu1, Franklin Wong2, Thomas A Aloia5, Pamela T Soliman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of extrauterine disease is critical to the management of patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. The purpose of the current study was to determine the accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the detection of extrauterine disease.
METHODS: Women with high-risk endometrial cancer were enrolled prospectively and underwent preoperative PET/CT followed by surgery, including sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphadenectomy. Primary tumor factors on PET/CT were correlated with lymph node pathology. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the detection of lymphadenopathy and peritoneal disease by PET/CT.
RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were enrolled and underwent PET/CT between April 2013 and May 2016, 108 of whom were evaluable. On PET/CT, 21 patients (19.4%) were found to have extrauterine disease, 18 (17%) had positive lymph nodes, and 8 (7%) had peritoneal disease. A total of 108 patients underwent surgery, 103 of whom (95%) underwent lymphadenectomy. The sensitivity of PET/CT to detect positive lymph nodes was 45.8%, with a specificity of 91.1%, positive predictive value of 61.1%, and negative predictive value of 84.7%. The false-negative rate was 54.2%. There was no difference in primary tumor characteristics on imaging noted between patients with positive and negative lymph nodes. The sensitivity of PET/CT to detect peritoneal disease was 37.5%, with a specificity of 97.8%, positive predictive value of 75%, and negative predictive value of 90.0%. The false-negative rate was 62.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PET/CT did not reliably predict the presence of extrauterine disease in women with high-risk endometrial cancer. Given the high false-negative rates, PET/CT should not be used in the preoperative treatment planning of these patients.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial cancer; extrauterine disease; lymph nodes; lymphadenectomy; peritoneal disease; preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31225906      PMCID: PMC6744337          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

1.  FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  J L Benedet; H Bender; H Jones; H Y Ngan; S Pecorelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  High frequency transvaginal ultrasonography in preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  D Arko; I Takac
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Evaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Seung-Su Han; Sang Hoon Lee; Dong Ho Kim; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Soon-Beom Kang; Yong Sang Song
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Diagnostic performance of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for detection of primary lesion and staging of endometrial cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Vahid Reza Dabbagh Kakhki; Sara Shahriari; Giorgio Treglia; Malihe Hasanzadeh; Seyed Rasoul Zakavi; Zohreh Yousefi; Sima Kadkhodayan; Ramin Sadeghi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Computed tomography in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  J P Connor; J I Andrews; B Anderson; R E Buller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM.

Authors:  Stephen B Edge; Carolyn C Compton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume measured by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Inki Lee; Hee Seung Kim; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song; Gi Jeong Cheon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: resection of macroscopic nodal disease and other determinants of survival.

Authors:  R E Bristow; M L Zahurak; C J Alexander; R C Zellars; F J Montz
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  MRI, PET/CT and ultrasound in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer - a multicenter prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Sofie Leisby Antonsen; Lisa Neerup Jensen; Annika Loft; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Junia Costa; Ann Tabor; Ingelise Qvist; Mette Rodi Hansen; Rune Fisker; Erik Søgaard Andersen; Lene Sperling; Anne Lerberg Nielsen; Jon Asmussen; Estrid Høgdall; Carsten L Fagö-Olsen; Ib Jarle Christensen; Lotte Nedergaard; Kirsten Jochumsen; Claus Høgdall
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy and economic impact of three work-up strategies identifying risk groups in endometrial cancer, fully incorporating sentinel lymph node algorithm.

Authors:  A A Novelli; A Puppo; M Ceccaroni; E Olearo; G Monterossi; G Mantovani; S Pelligra; P L Olearo; F Fanfani; G Scambia
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-10-08

2.  The Evaluation of Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Endometrial Cancer and the Correlation Between PET Parameters and Postoperative Pathology Results.

Authors:  Özge Vural Topuz; Ayşegül Aksu; Sadife Rüya Erinç; Nedim Tokgözoğlu; Müge Öner Tamam
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2022-02-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.