Maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) renders selection blind to mutations whose effects are limited to males. Evolutionary theory predicts this will lead to the accumulation of a male-specific genetic load within the mitochondrial genomes of populations; that is, a pool of mutations that negatively affects male, but not female, fitness components. This principle has been termed the Mother's Curse hypothesis. While the hypothesis has received some empirical support, its relevance to natural populations of metazoans remains unclear, and these ambiguities are compounded by the lack of a clear predictive framework for studies attempting to test Mother's Curse. Here, we seek to redress this by outlining the core predictions of the hypothesis, as well as the key features of the experimental designs that are required to enable direct testing of the predictions. Our goal is to provide a roadmap for future research seeking to elucidate the evolutionary significance of the Mother's Curse hypothesis.
Maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) renders selection blind to mutations whose effects are limited to males. Evolutionary theory predicts this will lead to the accumulation of a male-specific genetic load within the mitochondrial genomes of populations; that is, a pool of mutations that negatively affects male, but not female, fitness components. This principle has been termed the Mother's Curse hypothesis. While the hypothesis has received some empirical support, its relevance to natural populations of metazoans remains unclear, and these ambiguities are compounded by the lack of a clear predictive framework for studies attempting to test Mother's Curse. Here, we seek to redress this by outlining the core predictions of the hypothesis, as well as the key features of the experimental designs that are required to enable direct testing of the predictions. Our goal is to provide a roadmap for future research seeking to elucidate the evolutionary significance of the Mother's Curse hypothesis.
Authors: Venkatesh Nagarajan-Radha; Ian Aitkenhead; David J Clancy; Steven L Chown; Damian K Dowling Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Jean-François Lemaître; Victor Ronget; Morgane Tidière; Dominique Allainé; Vérane Berger; Aurélie Cohas; Fernando Colchero; Dalia A Conde; Michael Garratt; András Liker; Gabriel A B Marais; Alexander Scheuerlein; Tamás Székely; Jean-Michel Gaillard Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anne M Bronikowski; Richard P Meisel; Peggy R Biga; James R Walters; Judith E Mank; Erica Larschan; Gerald S Wilkinson; Nicole Valenzuela; Ashley Mae Conard; João Pedro de Magalhães; Jingyue Ellie Duan; Amy E Elias; Tony Gamble; Rita M Graze; Kristin E Gribble; Jill A Kreiling; Nicole C Riddle Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2022-01-23 Impact factor: 9.304
Authors: Lucy Anderson; M Florencia Camus; Katy M Monteith; Tiina S Salminen; Pedro F Vale Journal: Heredity (Edinb) Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 3.832